Do Med Schools Secretly Rank Majors? What Admissions Officers Say

Med schools are not secretly ranking your major on some hidden prestige ladder. They are doing something more inconvenient: they are judging what you did with it and how you performed, not the label on your diploma.

The myth that “biology and chemistry are the safest majors” or “engineering is secretly preferred” or “non‑traditional majors are either golden tickets or red flags” is wildly overstated. When you look at actual data and what admissions deans say off-mic, the pattern is boringly consistent: your major is a tool, not a ticket.

Let’s dismantle this properly.

---

(See also: Are Ivy League Undergrads Favored in AMCAS Admissions? Data Review for more details.)

The Myth: There’s a Hidden Major Hierarchy

Walk into any premed advising office and you’ll hear conflicting folklore by lunch:

• “Biology is what med schools expect. Play it safe.”
• “No, everyone does biology. You need something ‘unique’ like philosophy.”
• “Engineering majors get a GPA discount because it’s harder.”
• “Public health and psych are seen as ‘soft.’ They’ll count against you.”
• “If you’re not a science major, they’ll question if you can handle med school.”

All of those are oversimplified. Some are flat-out wrong.

Admissions officers are not sitting in a room with a spreadsheet that says:

• Biology: +0
• Neuroscience: +0.1
• Engineering: +0.3
• Humanities: +0.2
• “Easy” majors: –0.5

What they are doing is something more nuanced and much less friendly to one-size-fits-all advice: they interpret your academic performance in the context of your major, your school, and your course choices.

That looks a lot less like “rank majors” and a lot more like “pattern recognition.”

---

What the Data Actually Shows About Majors and Acceptance

Let’s start with numbers, not rumors.

The AAMC publishes annual data tables on medical school applicants and matriculants, broken down by major category. The key ones:

• Biological sciences
• Physical sciences
• Social sciences
• Humanities
• Math and statistics
• Engineering
• Other

When you look at those tables across multiple years, you do not see overwhelming evidence that any one category is the golden ticket.

Typical patterns (representative of recent cycles):

• Biology is the most common major by far and thus produces the largest number of accepted students, but its acceptance rate is usually middle-of-the-pack, not top.
• Humanities and social sciences majors often have similar or slightly higher acceptance rates than biology, with comparable or slightly higher mean MCATs.
• Engineering and math/stats applicants are a much smaller pool. Their acceptance rates can look favorable, but the absolute number is low, and they often have higher average MCATs. That’s self-selection, not magic preference.
• “Other” majors don’t collapse. They’re right in the mix.

Translation: the data does not support “You must pick X major to get in.”

What actually tracks with getting in?

• GPA (overall and science)
• MCAT
• Strength of clinical, service, and leadership experiences
• Quality of letters
• Coherence of your narrative and reasons for medicine

Major is a context variable, not a primary driver.

---

What Admissions Officers Actually Say (When Asked Directly)

Adcoms have been answering the “best premed major” question for decades. They’re not secretive about it. The answers are boring and consistent:

• “Choose a major you can excel in.”
• “We don’t have a preferred major.”
• “We admit music majors, engineers, English majors, and biologists side-by-side.”
• “What matters is that you complete the prerequisites and demonstrate strong academic performance.”

When pressed in off-the-record conversations, you do see some subtler themes:

1. They notice patterns of rigor.
   An engineering student taking differential equations, upper-level physics, and lab-heavy schedules is read differently than a student stacking the minimum-possible workload every semester. But this is about course rigor, not a “we love engineering” checkbox.

2. They expect alignment between major and performance.
   Majoring in biology but posting mediocre B‑/C+ grades in core science coursework raises questions. Majoring in English with As in both your major and the prerequisites? That signals intellectual range and discipline.

3. They’re wary of transparent gaming.
   If your transcript screams “cherry-picked the easiest possible path,” that’s a problem whether the major is biology, psych, or business. It’s the pattern, not the label.

What you never see from serious admissions leaders is anything like: “We rank majors A through F and give bonus points to the ones we like.” The variability across schools, applicant types, and institutional priorities makes that impossible.

---

The Hidden Variable: Rigor and Context, Not Major Title

Here’s where the myth partly originates: adcoms do evaluate you in context. That gets misremembered as “they rank majors.”

They don’t. They do this instead:

1. They benchmark you against your peers

If you’re a:

• Biology major at a school where half the campus is premed, adcoms know the typical grade distributions in your core courses. A 3.7 with strong upper-level biology and chemistry is competitive. A 3.1 with repeated C’s in orgo and physiology is not, regardless of your major’s name.
• Engineer at a rigorous program (think MIT, Georgia Tech, Michigan), they know your average GPA is often lower than humanities majors at the same institution. They adjust expectations a bit—but not as much as premed folklore suggests. A 2.9 “because engineering is hard” is not being boosted into a 3.7.

2. They look at course selection inside the major

Two biology majors:

• Student A: Heavy on cell bio, biochem, physiology, advanced labs, some statistics.
• Student B: Minimal upper-level science, mostly lower-division, sprinkled with “non-majors” science courses.

Same major. Very different signal.

Or two psychology majors:

• Student C: Research-heavy, statistics sequence, cognitive neuroscience, upper-level methods.
• Student D: Mostly survey electives, minimal quantitative or research exposure.

Again, not the same read. The issue is depth, not discipline.

3. They watch for mismatch between story and transcript

If you write:

• “I’m deeply passionate about global health and underserved communities”

…but your major, electives, and experiences show nothing related to that—no sociology, no public health, no community work—that disconnect stands out.

If instead:

• Your major is sociology, you have coursework in health disparities, statistics, community-based research, and long-term service with marginalized populations—your file matches your narrative. That’s what actually gets rewarded.

---

The Truth About “Easy Majors” and “Hard Majors”

Another common myth: med schools have a secret blacklist of “easy” majors (communications, general studies, kinesiology, etc.) and a whitelist of “hard” majors (engineering, physics, biochemistry).

Reality is more nuanced and occasionally inconvenient.

“Hard” majors don’t automatically buy forgiveness

Engineering is the classic example. Many premeds believe:

“A 3.3 in engineering ≈ 3.7 in biology in adcom eyes.”

There is some contextual grace. A 3.5 in rigorous engineering with strong MCAT and solid upper-level sciences will often be read more favorably than a 3.5 in a noticeably low-rigor path.

But they are still comparing you to national pools where successful applicants often have science GPAs above 3.6–3.7. No one is bumping you 0.4 GPA points in their mental math.

Engineering is a double-edged sword:

• It can impress if you perform well.
• It can bury you if you don’t.

“Easy” majors don’t automatically tank you

Yes, adcoms can tell which departments and course sequences at some universities have inflated grading and minimal rigor. But again, it’s not the name of the major that kills you; it’s:

• Shallow coursework
• Light credit loads
• Weak performance in the tough, standardized parts of your record (prereqs, MCAT)

You can major in something perceived as “easy” overall and still look strong if:

• You crush your science prerequisites.
• You take some challenging, quantitative, or writing-intensive electives.
• You lean into meaningful work, research, or service connected to your major.

They’re not punishing you for liking public health or psychology. They’re punishing you (fairly) for cruising.

---

Non‑Science Majors: Secret Advantage or Hidden Liability?

Another myth:

• Either “Humanities majors are gold—med schools love them because they’re rare”
• Or “Non‑science majors are suspect; they’ll doubt your ability to handle med school science.”

Reality is again in the middle.

Where non‑science majors help you

They stand out in a sea of biochemistry and neuroscience as long as:

• Your science prereqs are rock-solid (A–range when possible).
• Your MCAT science sections are strong (no “I’m an English major” excuse on Chem/Phys or Bio/Biochem).
• Your application shows depth in your field: serious writing, research, language skills, or quantitative work—not just a label.

Then your major signals:

• Intellectual breadth
• Strong reading, writing, argumentation skills
• A perspective on patients that isn’t purely molecular or mechanistic

When adcoms talk about wanting “non-traditional” students, this is often what they mean.

Where non‑science majors hurt you

They do not protect you from bad science metrics. Two pitfalls:

1. Weak prereq performance.
   If your physics/chem/biology grades are mediocre, a humanities major doesn’t excuse that. It just adds doubt: “Can they handle a science-heavy curriculum?”

2. Narrative incoherence.
   A business major with zero health-related coursework, limited clinical exposure, and a last-minute pivot to medicine looks like chasing prestige, not a developed interest. The issue is not “business”; it’s the disconnect.

So no, humanities are not a cheat code. They’re a high-variance play: high upside if done seriously, real downside if used as a GPA-padding maneuver without robust science to back it up.

---

How Smart Applicants Actually Choose Majors

If med schools aren’t secretly ranking majors, how should you choose?

Ignore the noise and optimize around three things:

1. Probability of sustained high performance

Can you maintain a strong GPA over four years in this major, given:

• Your genuine interests
• Your study habits
• The department’s culture and rigor

If you hate upper-level biology but love economics, brute-forcing a biology major because “it looks more premed” is a lose-lose. Your misery will show up as B–s and burnout.

2. Built‑in opportunities, not just content

Different majors plug you into different networks:

• Research labs (psychology, neuroscience, biology, engineering)
• Community work (sociology, public health, social work)
• Policy and ethics discussions (philosophy, political science)
• Communication-heavy environments (English, journalism)

Adcoms care about what you actually did, not what you theoretically could have done. Pick a major that naturally offers you the kinds of experiences and mentorship you want.

3. A coherent, honest narrative

Your major should make sense in the story you tell:

• Why you chose it
• What you learned
• How it shapes the kind of physician you want to be

For example:

• A computer science major who worked on health tech projects, did data science in an outcomes lab, and talks about applying informatics in clinical care—that’s coherent.
• A music major who integrated neuroscience of music, did hospital performances, and talks thoughtfully about healing, empathy, and discipline—that’s coherent too.

Med schools are not allergic to unusual majors; they’re allergic to incoherence and obvious box-checking.

---

So, Do Med Schools Secretly Rank Majors?

No. They do something more annoying for people seeking a shortcut: they read your academic record in context and judge how you used the freedom you had.

The real hierarchy looks less like:

Biology < Neuroscience < Engineering

and more like:

Coherent, rigorous, well-performed academic path

Disjointed, low-rigor, underperformed path

Major is a proxy they sometimes use to understand context, but it’s not the lever you think it is.

---

Key Takeaways

1. Med schools do not have a secret major ranking; they care about performance, rigor, and coherence, not specific disciplines.
2. “Hard” majors don’t buy you a GPA discount, and “easy” majors don’t automatically hurt you—what matters is how demanding your course choices were and how well you handled them.
3. The best premed major is the one where you can excel academically, access meaningful opportunities, and tell a credible, connected story about why you’re ready for medicine.