A Medical Student's Guide to Reporting NRMP Match Violations

Learn how to report NRMP Match Violations with confidence and protect the integrity of the residency selection process. This detailed guide walks you through when, how, and why to report potential breaches of NRMP rules, with practical examples, documentation tips, and guidance on protecting yourself.

---

Understanding NRMP Match Violations and Your Role in Reporting

The National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) is central to medical residency placement in the United States. To function fairly, it depends on all participants—applicants, programs, schools, and institutions—following clearly defined rules. When those rules are broken, it is not just a technical issue; it is a matter of Ethics in Medicine, professionalism, and patient trust.

Knowing how to recognize and report NRMP Match Violations is part of your responsibility as a future physician. It can feel intimidating, especially when power dynamics are involved, but there are structured Reporting Guidelines and protections in place to support you.

What Is an NRMP Match Violation?

NRMP Match Violations are actions that break the policies set out in the NRMP Match Participation Agreement and related rules. Common examples include:

• Misrepresentation of credentials or application information

  • Falsifying exam scores, research, degrees, or publications
  • Exaggerating clinical experience or roles (e.g., calling an observer position a “sub-internship”)
  • Omitting academic or professionalism issues that are required to be disclosed

• Improper offers or coercive behavior outside the Match

  • Programs offering guaranteed positions before or outside the Match (“pre-Match deals”) in violation of NRMP rules
  • Pressuring applicants to disclose rank lists or make binding commitments

• Failure to honor Match commitments

  • Applicants or programs not honoring the Match result (e.g., backing out of a matched position without a waiver)
  • Failure to withdraw from the Match when you have already accepted a position outside it

• Harassment, discrimination, or retaliatory conduct related to the Match process

  • Discriminatory questions or comments during interviews (e.g., about pregnancy, disability, race, religion, gender identity)
  • Threats, intimidation, or retaliation for refusing to share rank lists or for reporting concerns

Violations harm individual applicants and programs, but also weaken trust in the entire Medical Residency system.

---

Why Reporting NRMP Match Violations Matters for You and the Profession

Reporting can feel uncomfortable—especially if you worry about damaging relationships or your career. Yet there are compelling reasons to step forward when you see serious concerns.

1. Protecting Fairness for All Applicants

The NRMP algorithm assumes all parties are following the rules. When programs or applicants break them:

• Some gain an unfair advantage (e.g., secret promises, falsified credentials)
• Others lose fair opportunities (e.g., those who refuse to participate in unethical practices)
• The Match results no longer fully reflect merit, fit, and applicant preference

By reporting, you help restore a level playing field.

2. Safeguarding Yourself and Future Cohorts

Unaddressed violations tend to repeat. A program that pressures you to reveal your rank list this year may do the same—and worse—to next year’s applicants.

When NRMP confirms serious violations, it can impose sanctions such as:

• Restrictions on programs from participating in future Matches
• Fines or public posting of violations
• Limitations on individuals’ ability to participate in the Match

These actions protect not only you, but also classmates and future applicants.

3. Upholding Ethics in Medicine and Professional Standards

As a physician, you are expected to:

• Tell the truth
• Act fairly
• Speak up about unsafe or unethical behavior

The Match process is often your first major encounter with a system that relies strongly on professional honor. Reporting NRMP Match Violations is an extension of the same ethical duty you have to report unsafe clinical practices or academic dishonesty.

---

Step-by-Step Guide: How to Report NRMP Match Violations

The NRMP has a formal, confidential process for handling alleged violations. Following a structured approach will help your report be clear, credible, and actionable.

Step 1: Pause and Document the Situation Thoroughly

Before you file a report, create a detailed record of what happened—while events are still fresh.

Information to Gather

At minimum, write down:

• Nature of the suspected violation

  • What rule or expectation you believe was broken
  • Example: “Program director requested that I disclose my rank list and implied it would affect my ranking.”

• People and organizations involved

  • Names and roles (e.g., Program Director, Associate Program Director, Coordinator, applicant)
  • Institution and specific program name

• Timeline and context

  • Date, time, and setting (in-person, Zoom interview, phone call, email, text)
  • Whether others were present

• Exact wording and behavior

  • Direct quotes whenever possible
  • Description of tone (e.g., joking, serious, threatening)

• Supporting evidence

  • Screenshots of emails, text messages, or social media messages
  • Written policies or emails that conflict with NRMP rules
  • Witness names who observed or heard the interaction

Example Documentation Entry

Type of violation: Coercion to reveal rank order list
Program: Internal Medicine Residency, ABC University Hospital
Person involved: Dr. Smith, Program Director
Date and mode: February 5, 2025, Zoom interview
Details:
Dr. Smith stated, “We’ll likely rank you highly, but we need to know if you’re going to rank us first. If you don’t rank us first, we may need to reconsider where we place you.” I felt pressured to reveal my rank list, which I know is against NRMP policy.

Keep this documentation in a secure personal location (not on a shared institutional drive).

---

Step 2: Review NRMP Rules and Match Participation Agreement

Before filing, confirm that what you are concerned about is covered by NRMP policy. You do not need to be a legal expert, but aligning your concern to specific rules makes your report stronger.

How to Review the Rules

1. Go to the NRMP website.
2. Locate:
   • “Match Participation Agreement” (for applicants and programs)
   • “Violations Policies and Procedures”
   • Any specific rule summaries for your Match (e.g., Main Residency Match, Fellowship Matches).
3. Look for sections on:
   • Communication guidelines between applicants and programs
   • Prohibited behaviors (e.g., coercion, pre-Match offers, breach of confidentiality)
   • Sanctions and consequences

Framing Your Concern

After reviewing, you can frame your issue as:

• “I believe this may violate NRMP policies on program–applicant communication because…”
• “This appears to be an offer outside the NRMP Match.”
• “This may involve misrepresentation of credentials as defined by NRMP.”

You do not need to prove intent or fully “build the case.” That is NRMP’s role. Your task is to provide accurate, clear information.

---

Step 3: Use the NRMP Violation Reporting Mechanism

NRMP offers a specific process for reporting possible violations. While the exact web layout can change, the essentials are consistent.

How to Access the Reporting Form

1. Visit https://www.nrmp.org.
2. Navigate to:
   • “Contact” or “Support” or
   • A page labeled “Report a Violation” or “Violations and Sanctions”.
3. Look for an option such as:
   • “Submit a Violation Report”
   • “Report Suspected Violation”

If you cannot find the form easily, you can:

• Use the website’s search bar and type “Report a Violation” or “Match Violations”
• Contact NRMP support via their general contact and ask for the correct link

What the Reporting Form Usually Asks For

While exact fields may vary, expect to provide:

• Your information

  • Name and contact details
  • Institution and role (applicant, medical school official, program staff, etc.)
  • You may be allowed to request confidentiality or anonymous reporting

• Details about the involved party

  • Name of applicant or program
  • Institution and specialty
  • Match year and type (e.g., 2026 Main Residency Match, Pediatric Specialties Match)

• Incident description

  • Clear narrative of events (who, what, when, where, how)
  • Relevant dates or approximate time frame
  • Whether this is an ongoing concern or a one-time incident

• Evidence and attachments

  • Emails (PDFs or screenshots)
  • Text message screenshots
  • Letters, contracts, or unofficial “agreements”
  • Any written or recorded materials if allowed by law and local policy

Take time to write a clear, factual description. Avoid emotional language; instead, focus on what happened and how it relates to NRMP rules.

---

Step 4: Decide on Anonymity, Confidentiality, and Involving Your School

A common concern is, “Will this come back to hurt me?” Understanding your options can help you choose the safest path.

Anonymity vs. Identified Reporting

• Anonymous reporting

  • You may be able to submit a report without your name
  • Pros: May feel safer; reduces fear of retaliation
  • Cons: NRMP cannot follow up with you for clarification; sometimes harder to investigate fully

• Identified but confidential reporting

  • You share your identity with NRMP but can request confidentiality
  • NRMP may limit disclosure of your identity, but in some cases, details might indirectly identify you
  • Often enables more robust investigation

Consider discussing your options with:

• Your medical school’s Student Affairs or Dean’s Office
• An Ombudsperson, if your school has one
• A trusted faculty advisor familiar with the Match process

Many schools have formal procedures and experienced staff who have guided prior students through NRMP-related concerns.

---

Step 5: Submit the Report and Keep Your Records Organized

Once your report is complete:

1. Submit through the official channel

   • Online portal or secure email as instructed
   • Avoid informal methods like social media or unsecure personal email to NRMP staff

2. Save proof of submission

   • Confirmation email or ticket number
   • Date and time of submission
   • A copy of everything you sent

3. Maintain a secure personal file

   • All your notes and evidence
   • Copies of any further communications from NRMP

Avoid widely sharing that you filed a report, especially on public forums or social media. Discretion helps protect you and the integrity of the investigation.

---

Step 6: What to Expect After Reporting and How to Follow Up

NRMP aims to investigate suspected violations thoroughly and fairly. Investigations can take time, especially if multiple parties or institutions are involved.

Typical Post-Submission Process

While specifics vary, you can expect:

1. Acknowledgment of receipt
   • An email or message confirming your report was received
2. Initial review
   • NRMP assesses whether the complaint falls under its jurisdiction
   • They may request clarification or additional information from you
3. Investigation
   • NRMP may contact involved parties and institutions
   • Written responses and documentation might be requested
4. Decision and possible action
   • If a violation is confirmed, NRMP may impose sanctions based on its policies

You may or may not receive detailed information about the outcome, especially if doing so could compromise confidentiality.

Following Up

• If you have heard nothing after several weeks (e.g., 4–6 weeks), you can send a concise, professional inquiry:
  • Include your case or reference number (if provided)
  • Ask for a brief status update or confirmation that the matter is under review
• Keep your follow-up communications factual and respectful

---

Step 7: Legal and Personal Protection Considerations

Some NRMP Match Violations intersect with issues that go beyond NRMP’s scope—such as discrimination, harassment, or breach of employment law.

When to Consider Legal or Institutional Support

You may want to consult:

• Your medical school’s legal counsel or student affairs office if:
  • You experienced discrimination, harassment, or retaliation
  • A program or institution threatened your training opportunities
• Independent legal counsel if:
  • You believe your legal rights were violated
  • You face threats, defamation, or severe retaliation
• Institutional or national reporting channels for:
  • Title IX issues (sex- or gender-based harassment or discrimination)
  • Disability discrimination
  • Other civil rights concerns

NRMP focuses on Match-related rules; legal or institutional authorities address broader violations of law or policy.

Protecting Yourself Against Retaliation

To minimize risk:

• Document everything
  • Record any concerning interactions that occur after you raise your concerns
• Limit unnecessary disclosure
  • Share your reporting with only those who need to know (e.g., dean, advisor, counsel)
• Seek support
  • Lean on mentors, peers, or mental health services if the situation causes stress or anxiety

Reporting unethical behavior aligns with the core values of Ethics in Medicine. You are not at fault for someone else’s decision to violate rules.

---

Practical Scenarios: When Should You Report?

To make these principles more concrete, here are sample situations and how to think about them.

Scenario 1: A “Conditional” Ranking Promise

During a post-interview call, a program director says:

“We loved you. If you tell us we’re number one on your rank list, we’ll rank you to match.”

This is problematic because:

• It pressures you to disclose your rank list
• It implies your ranking decision directly influences their ranking decision, contrary to NRMP’s intent

Recommended response:

• Politely decline to share your rank list and note your interest in the program
• Document the interaction in detail
• Consider filing a report with NRMP if you believe there was clear coercion

Scenario 2: Pre-Match Offer with Contract

You receive an email from a program stating:

“We are prepared to offer you a PGY-1 spot outside the NRMP Match if you sign this contract by Friday.”

If the program is a participant in the NRMP Match, this likely violates policies.

Next steps:

• Do not sign anything until you understand the implications
• Save the email and any attachments
• Review NRMP rules on offers outside the Match
• Consider reporting the incident to NRMP and discussing it with your dean’s office

Scenario 3: Discriminatory Interview Questions

During an interview, you are asked:

“Do you plan to have children during residency? It can be disruptive to training.”

This can raise serious concerns about discrimination and professionalism, especially if tied to decisions about ranking.

Actions to consider:

• Document the question and context
• Discuss with your school’s administration to explore parallel reporting (e.g., Title IX, institutional channels)
• Consider whether this should be reported to NRMP as part of a broader pattern of unprofessional or discriminatory behavior linked to recruitment

---

Frequently Asked Questions About Reporting NRMP Match Violations

1. What exactly qualifies as an NRMP Match Violation?

An NRMP Match Violation is any action that breaks the rules in the NRMP Match Participation Agreement or related policies. This includes, but is not limited to:

• False or misleading information in an application
• Offers of positions outside the Match by NRMP-participating programs
• Pressure to reveal or change rank order lists
• Failure to honor the outcome of the Match
• Retaliation or threats related to Match decisions

If a behavior seems to undermine fairness, confidentiality, or the integrity of the Match, it is worth reviewing NRMP’s policies and considering a report.

2. Will I remain anonymous if I report a violation?

NRMP may allow anonymous reporting, but options can vary. In general:

• You can often submit a report without providing your name, but this may limit NRMP’s ability to seek clarification.
• If you include your identity, you can request that NRMP keep it confidential to the greatest extent possible.
• In some situations, details of the case might indirectly identify you even if your name is not disclosed.

If you are unsure, speak with your dean’s office or an advisor about how best to protect your identity while still providing enough information for NRMP to act.

3. What happens after I report an NRMP Match Violation?

Typically:

1. NRMP receives and logs your report.
2. They review whether the issue falls under their jurisdiction.
3. If it does, they may:
   • Request more information from you
   • Contact involved parties and institutions
   • Collect and review documents and responses
4. After investigation, NRMP determines whether a violation occurred and, if so, what sanctions are appropriate.

You may not receive detailed updates about the investigation or outcome, but you can generally expect at least confirmation of receipt and, sometimes, a summary of whether the matter was addressed.

4. How do I know if my concern is “serious enough” to report?

You do not need to be certain that a rule was broken. Consider reporting when:

• You believe behavior clearly conflicts with NRMP guidelines or professional norms
• You feel pressured to do something that seems dishonest or coercive related to the Match
• You witness ongoing or systematic misconduct (e.g., repeated pre-Match offers, misrepresentation, or threats)

If you are uncertain, you can:

• Review the NRMP rules
• Talk confidentially with a trusted dean, advisor, or mentor
• Submit a report describing what you observed and allow NRMP to determine whether it meets violation criteria

Erring on the side of reporting is often appropriate; you are flagging a concern, not making a legal accusation.

5. Can I get in trouble for mistakenly reporting something that isn’t a violation?

If you report in good faith—meaning you honestly believe there may be a violation, based on what you know—you are generally not penalized because NRMP ultimately determines whether a violation occurred.

Issues arise only if:

• Someone knowingly submits false accusations or fabricates evidence
• Reporting is used maliciously to damage an applicant or program

As long as you are honest, factual, and acting out of concern for fairness and ethics, reporting is a responsible and professional action.

---

Conclusion: Your Role in Protecting the Integrity of the Match

The NRMP Match works only when participants trust that the rules are followed and enforced. Understanding How to Navigate NRMP Match Rules, recognizing potential Match Violations, and knowing how to use NRMP’s Reporting Guidelines are essential components of your professional development.

By:

• Carefully documenting questionable behavior
• Reviewing NRMP rules and policies
• Using the official reporting mechanisms
• Seeking support from your institution when needed

you contribute to a residency selection system that is transparent, fair, and consistent with the highest standards of Ethics in Medicine.

Taking action may feel uncomfortable, but it aligns with the values you are expected to uphold as a physician. Protecting the integrity of the Match helps not only you, but also your peers, future applicants, and ultimately the patients who rely on a just and competent medical training system.