Essential Tips to Avoid NRMP Match Violations for Medical Students

Top Strategies to Sidestep NRMP Match Violations and Protect Your Residency Match
The National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) sits at the center of the U.S. residency selection process. For most applicants, the NRMP is the gateway to graduate medical education, and it is designed to be fair, confidential, and binding for both programs and applicants.
At the same time, the NRMP Match comes with very specific rules—and unintentionally breaking them can seriously jeopardize your chances of matching, delay your training, or even affect your long-term career in medicine.
This guide walks you through practical, evidence-based strategies to avoid NRMP Match violations. You’ll learn what behavior crosses the line, how to communicate safely with programs, and how to structure your entire application season to stay fully compliant while still advocating for yourself as a strong candidate.
Understanding What Really Counts as an NRMP Match Violation
Before you can prevent a violation, you need a clear understanding of what the NRMP considers unacceptable behavior. Many Match violations are unintentional—the result of misinformation, assumptions, or pressure during interviews and ranking season.
Core Principles Behind NRMP Rules
The NRMP Match Participation Agreement (MPA) is grounded in a few key principles:
- Fairness: Programs and applicants should make ranking decisions based on mutual preference, not coercion.
- Confidentiality: Rank order lists (ROLs) are private; neither side should attempt to influence or reveal them.
- Binding Commitment: A match result is a contract; both parties are expected to honor it.
- Transparency and Honesty: Information provided in applications, interviews, and supplemental updates must be truthful and accurate.
All NRMP rules are interpretive extensions of these core values.
Common Categories of Match Violations
While you should always review the current NRMP Match Participation Agreement, most violations fall into several recognizable groups:
Misrepresentation
- Inflating or falsifying scores, publications, degrees, or experiences.
- Misstating visa status or graduation date.
- Claiming a program is your “number one choice” when you tell several programs the same in a misleading way that implies a binding promise.
Improper Commitments or Contracting Outside the Match
- Agreeing (or asking someone to agree) to rank each other “number one” as a condition of receiving an interview or strong consideration.
- Programs requesting written or verbal commitments to rank them in a certain position.
- Signing any contract for a residency position covered by the Match before results are released (with limited exceptions such as some military or early specialty matches).
Coercive or Prohibited Communication
- Pressuring a program or applicant for information about their rank order list.
- Asking, “Where will you rank us?” or “Please tell me if you’re ranking us first.”
- Tying a program’s ranking of a candidate to their answer on rank-related questions.
Failure to Follow Match Procedures
- Not withdrawing from the Match before accepting a position outside the Match.
- Failing to start a matched position without an NRMP-approved waiver.
- Participating in multiple concurrent Matches without appropriate disclosure (for example, certain combined or supplemental pathways).
Post-Match Conduct Violations
- Reneging on a Match commitment without a granted waiver.
- Programs failing to offer a contract to a matched applicant, or materially altering the agreed terms.
Understanding these broad categories provides the framework for the strategies below.
Strategy 1: Stay Deeply Informed About NRMP Rules and Expectations
The single most effective way to sidestep Match violations is to know the rules better than most applicants—and better than some programs.
Key Actions to Stay Current
Read (not just skim) the NRMP Match Participation Agreement
- Download the most recent version from the NRMP website.
- Focus on sections concerning:
- Applicant responsibilities and prohibited behaviors
- Communication guidelines
- Waivers and penalties
- Mark any unclear points and discuss them with your dean’s office or an advisor.
Review NRMP’s “Match Policies” and “Violations” Pages
- The NRMP website includes:
- Definitions of violations
- Examples of past decisions by the NRMP Violation Review Committee (VRC)
- Descriptions of sanctions
- These real-world examples help you recognize risk areas you might not have considered.
- The NRMP website includes:
Use Official NRMP Educational Resources
- Attend NRMP-hosted webinars on:
- Introduction to the Match
- Policy updates
- Ranking and the Match algorithm
- Watch archived videos or review slide decks if you can’t attend live.
- Attend NRMP-hosted webinars on:
Cross-Check Peer Advice
- Forums (e.g., SDN, Reddit, specialty-specific groups) can be helpful for shared experiences, but:
- Always verify Match-related advice with official NRMP resources or your dean’s office.
- If “everyone on Reddit” says something is okay but the NRMP rules do not, follow the NRMP.
- Forums (e.g., SDN, Reddit, specialty-specific groups) can be helpful for shared experiences, but:
Being systematically informed transforms NRMP rules from a vague anxiety into a manageable framework you can work within confidently.

Strategy 2: Practice Clear, Ethical, and Compliant Communication
Most Match-related anxiety comes from not knowing what you can say to programs—or what programs are allowed to ask you. Communication missteps are a major source of NRMP Match violations.
What You Can Safely Say to Programs
You are allowed to express interest, enthusiasm, and preferences, provided you don’t make promises about your rank list:
- Permissible examples:
- “I greatly enjoyed my interview and feel your program would be an excellent fit for my career goals.”
- “You are one of my top choices, and I plan to rank your program highly.”
- “I could see myself thriving in your training environment.”
You are not obligated to tell any program how you will rank them, and you are never required to reveal your full rank order list.
What Programs Are Not Allowed to Ask
Programs may not:
- Ask you:
- “Where will you rank us?”
- “Will you rank us first if we rank you highly?”
- “Are we your top choice?”
- Condition interview offers, rankings, or positions on your answers about ranking or other programs.
If a program asks you a question that feels uncomfortable or rank-related, you can respond professionally and noncommittally:
- “Per NRMP policy, I’m not able to discuss specifics of my rank list, but I can say I’m very interested in your program and appreciate the opportunity to interview.”
Responding to Post-Interview Contact
Post-interview communication is legal but must be non-coercive:
If a program emails you stating you are “ranked to match” or “highly ranked”:
- You may respond with gratitude:
- “Thank you for the update and your kind words. I enjoyed meeting your team and appreciate being considered.”
- Avoid promising how you will rank them.
- You may respond with gratitude:
If you want to send a “love letter”:
- Keep it truthful:
- If they truly are your top choice:
- “Your program is my top choice, and I plan to rank you first.”
This is allowed as long as it is honest.
- “Your program is my top choice, and I plan to rank you first.”
- If you have multiple strong interests:
- “I intend to rank your program very highly among my choices.”
- If they truly are your top choice:
- Keep it truthful:
Lying in post-interview communication may be considered misrepresentation and can be grounds for an NRMP violation, especially if discovered.
When in Doubt—Ask, Don’t Guess
If you’re unsure whether a communication is acceptable:
- Check NRMP’s communication guidelines.
- Discuss the scenario with:
- Your student affairs dean
- A trusted faculty advisor
- Your school’s GME or Match advisor
- For truly unclear situations, you can anonymously contact the NRMP for clarification.
Being intentional, honest, and policy-aware in your communication dramatically reduces the risk of accidental violations.
Strategy 3: Structure Your Application and Match Timeline to Avoid Errors
Many procedural violations happen not because of bad intentions, but because of poor organization—missed deadlines, incomplete withdrawals, or last-minute decisions.
Build a Detailed NRMP and Residency Calendar
Use a digital or paper planner to map out the entire application season:
Pre-application phase
- ERAS opening dates
- Letters of recommendation requested and due dates
- USMLE/COMLEX score reporting timelines
Interview season
- Interview invitations and confirmations
- Travel or virtual interview logistics
- Thank-you notes timeline (if you choose to send them)
NRMP-specific
- NRMP registration deadline
- Rank order list open and close dates
- Withdraw-by dates if your plans change
- Match Week (including SOAP, if applicable)
Setting reminders a week and 48 hours before every major deadline can help you avoid last-minute mistakes.
Create Checklists for Each Phase of the Residency Match
Break Match-related tasks into manageable steps:
Before submitting ERAS
- Verify all biographical info and graduation dates.
- Confirm USMLE/COMLEX attempts and scores are accurate.
- Double-check research, publications, and presentations.
During interviews
- Review NRMP rules on communication.
- Prepare responses to potential inappropriate questions in a respectful way.
- Log impressions immediately after each interview.
Before submitting your rank list
- Ensure every program on your rank list is a place you are willing to train.
- Remove any programs you would not attend even if they are the only match option.
- Confirm there are no duplicate or incorrectly entered programs.
A structured approach minimizes “technical” violations such as failing to withdraw from the Match before taking an out-of-Match position.
Preparing for SOAP and Post-Match Scenarios
If you go unmatched, the Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program (SOAP) has its own strict rules:
- Know SOAP rules early, not just during Match Week.
- During SOAP:
- Do not contact programs outside ERAS/NRMP-approved channels.
- Do not solicit positions directly via phone or email outside allowed mechanisms.
- After SOAP:
- Any position accepted outside the Match must be consistent with NRMP policies and your current participation status.
Being prepared for all possible outcomes reduces the risk of panicked decisions that could lead to violations.
Strategy 4: Understand the NRMP Match Algorithm—and Use It Correctly
The NRMP Match algorithm is applicant-proposing, which means it is designed to favor applicant preferences. Misunderstanding this process can push applicants into risky or unnecessary pre-Match agreements or coercive conversations.
Key Features of the NRMP Algorithm
You should always rank programs in the true order of your preference, regardless of:
- How “competitive” you think a program is
- What you think your chances are
- What you think programs might do
Programs do not see your rank list number; they only submit their own ranking and the Match algorithm handles the pairing.
Attempts to “game” the algorithm by:
- Ranking only “safe” programs
- Avoiding top choices out of fear often backfire and are unnecessary.
How Algorithm Knowledge Helps You Avoid Violations
When you understand that:
- You cannot improve your chances by promising to rank a program higher in exchange for favors.
- Programs also cannot guarantee you a position unless the algorithm actually matches you.
…you are less vulnerable to:
- Pressure tactics (“If you promise to rank us first, we’ll rank you high.”)
- Misleading assurances from programs (e.g., “We guarantee you will match here,” which they cannot actually guarantee).
Use your understanding of the algorithm to:
- Confidently decline to disclose ranking details.
- Politely resist any suggestions of “side deals” or informal guarantees.
- Structure your rank list by true preference, not fear or perceived expectations.
Strategy 5: Document Everything to Protect Yourself
Thorough documentation is a powerful tool—both to prevent miscommunication and to protect you if a potential NRMP violation issue arises.
What You Should Consistently Document
Email Correspondence
- Save all emails exchanged with:
- Program coordinators and directors
- Faculty at programs discussing your candidacy
- Store them in labeled folders (e.g., “Residency – Program X”).
- Save all emails exchanged with:
Notes from Phone or Video Calls
- After a phone call with a program, jot down:
- Date and time
- Who was present on the call
- Key points discussed, especially if anything sounded concerning or rank-related
- These contemporaneous notes can be important if there’s a future review.
- After a phone call with a program, jot down:
Application Submissions and Confirmations
- Keep:
- ERAS submission receipts
- NRMP registration confirmation
- Rank order list certification confirmation (screenshot or email)
- Keep:
Any Changes to Your Status
- If you withdraw from:
- A specialty
- The Match entirely
- Save:
- The email or form you submitted
- Any confirmation from NRMP or your dean’s office
- If you withdraw from:
How Documentation Helps in a Dispute
If a program alleges a violation—or you feel a program has violated NRMP rules—having a clear record:
- Clarifies what was actually said versus what is alleged.
- Demonstrates that you acted in good faith and attempted to follow rules.
- Supports you if an NRMP investigation or review is initiated.
You may never need this paper trail, but if you do, it can be crucial to protecting your future in medical education.
Strategy 6: Seek Expert Career Guidance and Institutional Support
You do not have to navigate NRMP rules alone. Most medical schools and training institutions provide robust support structures precisely because the Residency Match is so complex and high-stakes.
Tap Into Your Home Institution Resources
Student Affairs / Dean’s Office
- They typically:
- Know NRMP policies very well.
- Have navigated complex Match situations in past years.
- Can advocate on your behalf if a program behaves inappropriately.
- They typically:
Residency Program Directors and Faculty Mentors
- Ask them:
- How they interpret common gray-area communications.
- What language they recommend in follow-up emails.
- How to handle inappropriate questions during interviews.
- Ask them:
GME Office (if you are already in a transitional or preliminary position)
- They can:
- Help clarify dual participation if you are reapplying.
- Advise about waivers, contract issues, and NRMP reporting.
- They can:
Consider External Professional Services—Carefully
Some applicants use private advisors or coaching services for:
- Application strategy
- Personal statement editing
- Interview coaching
If you choose this route:
- Confirm that:
- The advisor understands and respects NRMP rules.
- They do not encourage unethical practices, such as:
- Misleading statements to programs
- Coordinated “love letter” campaigns that could be construed as deceptive
- Remember: You are ultimately responsible for compliance, not your advisor.
Trusted guidance from informed mentors is one of the best defenses against unintentional Match violations.
Strategy 7: Know the Consequences of NRMP Match Violations—and Take Concerns Seriously
Understanding the potential repercussions of a Match violation reinforces why it is so important to err on the side of caution.
Possible Sanctions for Applicants
The NRMP can impose several levels of sanctions, which may include:
Reprimand or Censure
- Formal notation in NRMP records, potentially reported to:
- Medical schools
- Future residency programs
- Formal notation in NRMP records, potentially reported to:
Restrictions on Future Match Participation
- Temporary suspension from participating in future NRMP Matches.
- Conditions that must be met before re-entry.
Barred from the Match
- In severe cases, a permanent ban on participating in the NRMP Match.
Impact on Current or Future Training
- Loss of a matched position if the violation involves post-Match commitments or fraudulent representation.
- Institutional reporting to licensing bodies or boards in very serious cases.
If You Suspect You May Have Violated a Rule
If you realize you may have crossed a line:
- Do not ignore it.
- Document what happened immediately: dates, times, content of the interaction.
- Talk to your dean or advisor as soon as possible.
- Seek clarification from the NRMP, potentially anonymously at first if you are seeking general policy guidance.
Early, honest engagement often leads to better outcomes than concealment or delay.
Programs Can Be Sanctioned Too
Remember that NRMP rules apply to programs as well:
- Programs may be cited for:
- Coercive communications
- Failing to honor match commitments
- Requiring pre-Match contracts inappropriately
- If a program behaves in a way that seems clearly against NRMP guidelines, you can:
- Document the incident.
- Discuss it with your school.
- Report it to NRMP if appropriate.
The NRMP’s commitment to fairness applies to both sides of the Residency Match.

Frequently Asked Questions About NRMP Match Violations
1. What are the most common NRMP Match violations applicants should watch out for?
Common violations include:
- Misrepresentation of credentials
- Exaggerating research, falsifying publications, altering test scores, or misrepresenting graduation status.
- Improper commitments
- Agreeing to rank a program in a specific position in exchange for preferential treatment.
- Coercive communication
- Allowing themselves to be pressured into disclosing rank list information or participating in “side deals.”
- Failure to honor the Match
- Not starting a matched position without an NRMP-approved waiver or leaving prematurely in violation of the agreement.
- Accepting positions outside the Match without proper withdrawal
- Failing to formally withdraw from the NRMP Match before taking a residency spot not covered by the Match.
Careful attention to honesty, communication boundaries, and official procedures helps avoid these problems.
2. Can I tell a program they are my “number one choice” without violating NRMP rules?
Yes—with important conditions:
- You may tell a program:
- “You are my top choice, and I plan to rank your program first,” if this is true.
- You must not:
- Make this claim to multiple programs if it is not accurate.
- Use this as a negotiating tool or in exchange for promises from the program.
- The key issue is honesty. Misleading programs in post-interview communication can be considered misrepresentation under NRMP policies.
If you are uncomfortable making such a strong statement, you can use truthful but less absolute language such as, “I intend to rank your program very highly.”
3. What should I do if a program asks me directly where I will rank them?
If a program asks:
- “Where will you rank us?”
- “Are we your number one choice?”
- “Will you rank us highly if we rank you highly?”
You can respond professionally while maintaining compliance:
- “NRMP policy asks applicants and programs not to discuss specific rank list positions. I can say that I’m very interested in your program and would be happy to train here.”
You can also:
- Document the interaction.
- Discuss it with your dean’s office if it seemed coercive or made you uncomfortable.
Programs are not permitted to require this information or condition ranking decisions on your response.
4. Can I withdraw from the Match or from a program after I apply or interview?
Yes, but timing and process matter:
Withdrawing from the NRMP Match:
- You may withdraw before the rank list deadline if your plans change (e.g., you accept an out-of-Match position).
- You must follow NRMP’s official withdrawal procedures in your NRMP applicant portal.
Withdrawing from individual programs:
- You may withdraw your application or decline interviews as the season progresses.
- Notify programs promptly and professionally via email.
After Match results:
- Once you are matched, you are bound to that program.
- To not start or to leave early, you must request and receive an NRMP waiver.
- Leaving without a waiver can be a serious violation.
Always coordinate such changes with your medical school and follow NRMP guidelines precisely.
5. What should I do if I think a program or I may have committed an NRMP violation?
If you suspect a violation:
- Document everything immediately: emails, names, dates, and specific language used.
- Consult your dean’s office or student affairs for advice and support.
- If needed, contact the NRMP:
- You can ask general policy questions without naming specific programs at first.
- If a formal complaint is warranted, the NRMP will guide you on the process.
Do not attempt to “fix” the situation by altering records, changing your story, or signing informal side agreements. Transparency and early action are your best protections.
By staying informed, communicating clearly and ethically, organizing your Match activities carefully, and seeking experienced guidance, you can navigate the NRMP Residency Match with confidence—maximizing your chances of a successful match while avoiding costly violations.
SmartPick - Residency Selection Made Smarter
Take the guesswork out of residency applications with data-driven precision.
Finding the right residency programs is challenging, but SmartPick makes it effortless. Our AI-driven algorithm analyzes your profile, scores, and preferences to curate the best programs for you. No more wasted applications—get a personalized, optimized list that maximizes your chances of matching. Make every choice count with SmartPick!
* 100% free to try. No credit card or account creation required.













