Mastering Difficult Attendings: The Essential Guide for Residents

Understanding Difficult Attendings: Context, Power, and Patterns

Residency is demanding on its own; adding a difficult attending physician can turn an already intense experience into something that feels unmanageable. Learning to navigate these relationships is a core professional skill—one that will serve you for the rest of your career.

This guide focuses on managing difficult attendings, not diagnosing or labeling people. The goal is to help you protect your learning, your evaluations, and your well‑being while maintaining professionalism and patient safety.

Why attendings sometimes seem “toxic”

Not every unpleasant interaction means someone is a “toxic attending physician.” Behavior exists on a spectrum:

• High standards, low support: Pushing residents hard without adequate teaching or feedback.
• Poor communication style: Abrupt, sarcastic, or culturally insensitive comments.
• Chronic unprofessional behavior: Yelling, belittling, shaming, or threatening.
• Truly toxic patterns: Persistent bullying, retaliation, discrimination, or behaviors that undermine safety.

Contributing factors often include:

• Burnout, sleep deprivation, or moral injury
• Lack of formal teaching/leadership training
• Stress from productivity pressures, documentation, or institutional change
• Generational or cultural differences in communication norms

Understanding the context doesn’t excuse harmful behavior—but it can help you strategize instead of only reacting emotionally.

Power dynamics you must account for

The relationship between a resident and a difficult attending is asymmetric:

• They evaluate your performance (and sometimes letters of recommendation).
• They control your schedule and responsibilities during the rotation.
• They may have institutional power (chief of service, PD, or committee membership).

Because of this, your approach must be strategic and self‑protective, not simply honest in the way you’d be with a peer. The aim is to:

• Preserve patient safety
• Preserve your learning and evaluations
• Preserve your psychological safety

Think of it less as “fixing” the attending and more as skillfully managing a high‑stakes professional relationship.

---

Common Types of Difficult Attendings and How to Recognize Them

Recognizing patterns lets you pick the right strategy. Many attendings will combine traits from several categories, but these broad types can help you think clearly.

1. The Perfectionist Critic

Profile:

• Very high standards
• Focused on details, guidelines, and “the right way”
• Feedback often feels harsh, nitpicky, or relentless
• Rarely offers praise; mainly points out errors

How this feels to residents:
You may feel like you can never do anything right, and every small miss becomes a public lesson.

Risks:

• Erosion of confidence
• Fear-based learning
• Reluctance to speak up or ask questions

Strategy highlights:

• Pre‑emptive transparency:
  “For our 9 a.m. rounds, I’ve pre‑reviewed all labs and imaging, but I’m still learning how you prefer plans framed. I’d appreciate feedback on my presentations today so I can align with your expectations.”

• Convert criticism into actionable steps:
  When they say, “Your note is terrible,” respond with:
  “I’d like to improve. Which parts would you focus on changing first—structure, clarity of assessment, or plan details?”

• Document learning points in a dedicated note or app; occasionally reference it:
  “Yesterday you emphasized structuring my assessment by problem. I tried that today—can you let me know if I’m closer to what you’re looking for?”

Perfectionist critics can sometimes become strong advocates once they see you are serious, prepared, and coachable.

---

2. The Unpredictable or Volatile Attending

Profile:

• Mood and behavior change day to day (or hour to hour)
• One moment validating, the next furious or demeaning
• Feedback style may include yelling, door‑slamming, or public criticism

How this feels to residents:
You walk on eggshells, constantly scanning for danger. You may have physical anxiety symptoms before rounds.

Risks:

• Significant stress and burnout
• Impaired concentration and performance
• Risk of patient safety issues if communication shuts down

Strategy highlights:

• Control what you can: preparation and boundaries

  • Arrive early, anticipate questions, triple‑check orders and notes.
  • Avoid late‑night nonurgent communications unless clearly invited.

• Use brief, neutral responses in the moment
  If you’re yelled at:
  “I hear your concern about the delay in the lab follow‑up. I’ll confirm the results now and update you in 5 minutes.”

• De‑escalate, then follow up later
  Reacting angrily in the moment rarely helps. If safe, you might later say privately:
  “When feedback is delivered loudly in front of patients, I find it harder to process and correct things. I can incorporate your feedback better if we can talk in the workroom.”

If volatility crosses into threats, humiliation, or discrimination, document specifics and consider elevating to a chief resident, program leadership, or GME office.

---

3. The Disengaged or Absent Attending

Profile:

• Hard to reach, leaves early, or arrives late
• Quickly signs notes or orders without discussion
• Minimal bedside teaching or case discussion
• May spend most of the time on the computer or phone

How this feels to residents:
You feel abandoned in your learning. The attending may not know your name, or what level of training you are.

Risks:

• Missed supervision opportunities
• Weak letters or generic evaluations
• Felt pressure to manage more independently than is appropriate

Strategy highlights:

• Create micro‑teaching moments
  “Before you leave, could I quickly run a case by you and get your thoughts on the differential?”
  Or: “Would you mind if I present one patient in a problem-based format to get your feedback?”

• Clarify supervision expectations early
  “For admissions overnight, what would you like me to call you about vs. handle and staff in the morning?”

• Ask targeted, efficient questions
  “I’ve narrowed our approach to two management options for this COPD exacerbation—would you recommend A or B in this context, and why?”

With disengaged attendings, a small number of high‑yield, well‑timed interactions can dramatically improve your learning and their impression of your work.

---

4. The Public Humiliator

Profile:

• Uses shaming comments, sarcasm, or “pimping” to embarrass
• May criticize in front of nurses, students, patients, or families
• Defends behavior as “old‑school” or “toughening you up”

How this feels to residents:
You dread rounds, feel exposed, and ruminate about mistakes long after the shift.

Risks:

• Erosion of psychological safety
• Decreased team communication (people hide errors)
• Long‑term impact on self‑confidence and professional identity

Strategy highlights:

• Stay anchored in professionalism in the moment
  If insulted in front of others:
  “I don’t know the answer to that, but I can look it up and report back after rounds.”

• Protect patients from the fallout
  If conflict is occurring in front of a patient, gently redirect:
  “Let’s step outside to finalize the plan; we’ll come back to explain it clearly.”

• Consider structured feedback outside the heat of the moment (if safe)
  “I learn best when feedback is specific and private. I’m committed to improving, and it would help me if we could discuss concerns after rounds.”

If behavior is frequent and severe, this may rise to the level of harassment or abuse; institutional reporting may be warranted.

---

5. The Biased or Discriminatory Attending

Profile:

• Makes comments about race, gender, accent, religion, sexual orientation, or disability
• Consistently treats certain residents or patients differently
• May “favor” those who look like them or share similar backgrounds

How this feels to residents:
You may question whether your performance or identity is being evaluated fairly. Microaggressions can accumulate into significant distress.

Risks:

• Harm to resident well‑being and career trajectories
• Inequitable educational opportunities
• Ethical and legal concerns for the institution

Strategy highlights:

• Prioritize your safety—psychological and professional
• Document specifics: date, time, exact words, witnesses.
• Consider using institutional channels:
  • Chief residents
  • Program director or associate PD
  • GME office, ombudsperson, or DEI officer
  • Anonymous reporting systems if available

Discrimination is not “part of training.” Programs are increasingly obligated—and often willing—to address such conduct, although the process may be imperfect.

---

Core Skills for Dealing With Difficult Attendings

Across all types of difficult attending physicians, a few core skills make the biggest difference.

1. Preparation as a protective strategy

Being better prepared won’t fix an abusive attending, but it does:

• Reduce the number of preventable conflicts
• Strengthen your credibility with colleagues and leadership
• Give you more bandwidth to handle interpersonal challenges

Concrete tactics:

• Preview the attending’s style
  Ask senior residents: “Anything I should know about how Dr. X likes rounds and presentations?”
  Often, they’ll tell you specific preferences that can prevent friction.

• Arrive early, anticipate pain points

  • Know vitals, labs, and key imaging for each patient.
  • Have 1–2 management options in mind for each major problem.
  • Pre‑chart if possible.

• Standardize your presentations
  Use a consistent framework (SOAP, organ‑system based, or problem‑based). When your structure is reliable, the attending is more likely to see progress over time.

2. Communication techniques that reduce friction

How you speak can matter as much as what you say, especially when dealing with attendings who are easily frustrated.

Use concise headlines:

Instead of:
“I have this patient who came in, and there’s a lot going on…”
Try:
“Mr. Smith is a 68‑year‑old with COPD admitted for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, now improving on BiPAP.”

Acknowledge their priorities first:

If they’re focused on efficiency, open with:
“I’ll keep this brief and focus on changes and decisions.”

Practice “verbal judo” during tense moments:

• Validate the concern without self‑flagellation:
  “You’re right, I should have followed up that critical lab sooner.”
• Then immediately move to action:
  “I’ve called the lab to confirm all pending results and updated the list so nothing is missed again today.”

This signals responsibility and problem‑solving rather than defensiveness.

3. Boundary setting for your own protection

Even as a trainee, you are allowed to have boundaries—especially around safety and dignity.

Examples of professional boundaries:

• “I’m committed to learning from my mistakes, but yelling makes it harder for me to process your feedback in real time.”
• “I’m not comfortable being spoken to that way. I’d like to focus on the patient’s care.”

Not every situation allows for direct boundary setting (particularly with highly volatile or retaliatory individuals). In those cases:

• Prioritize de‑escalation in the moment, then
• Seek support and advocacy from leadership afterward.

4. Documentation: Your invisible shield

When a difficult attending becomes a pattern or risk rather than a one‑off challenge, contemporaneous documentation can be essential.

Keep a secure, private log (not on patient charts, not on shared drives) with:

• Date, time, location
• Who was present
• Exact words or behaviors (avoid interpretation)
• Impact on patient care or team function, if any
• Any follow‑up steps you took

This may be helpful if:

• You need to explain an evaluation that seems clearly disproportionate or biased
• You decide to approach the program director or GME
• The behavior escalates to harassment or discrimination

---

When and How to Escalate Concerns

Not every difficult attending requires formal escalation. But there are clear situations where doing nothing is not acceptable.

Situations that warrant escalation

• Persistent yelling, threats, or humiliation
• Racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise discriminatory remarks
• Retaliation after you raised a patient safety concern
• Pressuring you to do things beyond your competency without supervision
• Patient safety being compromised due to the attending’s behavior (e.g., refusing to listen to concerns about a deteriorating patient)

Choosing the right channel

Depending on the severity and your comfort level, options may include:

• Chief residents
  Often the best first step. They know personalities, can coach you, and may intervene behind the scenes.

• Program director (PD) or associate PD
  Appropriate for serious or repeated issues, or if your learning/safety is compromised.

• Faculty advisor or mentor
  Helpful for perspective and advice on strategy; they may privately talk with leadership on your behalf.

• Institutional offices

  • GME office
  • Office of Professionalism or Faculty Affairs
  • Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
  • Ombudsperson or confidential counselor

• Anonymous or safe‑reporting systems
  Many institutions have hotlines or online portals. These are useful if you fear direct retaliation, though they may limit how specifically leadership can respond.

How to frame the conversation

When dealing with attendings who are causing serious issues, your report will be stronger if you are:

• Specific: “On 10/12 at 8:30 a.m. during MICU rounds, Dr. X said, ‘You’re incompetent and dangerous’ in front of the entire team and patient’s family…”
• Focused on impact: “After that, I felt hesitant to speak up about ventilator concerns, which could jeopardize patient safety.”
• Solution‑oriented: “I’m seeking guidance on how to handle this and how to ensure this environment is safe for trainees.”

You’re not required to propose a perfect solution; that’s leadership’s role. Your responsibility is to communicate clearly and honestly.

---

Protecting Your Career and Your Well‑Being

Managing a difficult or toxic attending physician isn’t just about surviving a rotation; it’s about preserving the trajectory of your career and the integrity of your professional identity.

Navigating evaluations and letters of recommendation

When you’re stuck with an attending who dislikes you—or seems to:

• Diversify your evaluators
  Make sure other attendings, fellows, and senior residents who know your work have opportunities to submit evaluations.

• Ask for mid‑rotation feedback
  “Are there specific things I can change in the next two weeks to better meet your expectations?”
  If they say “no,” that can be helpful later as evidence that you sought improvement but didn’t receive guidance.

• Request letters strategically
  If an attending has been consistently harsh without constructive feedback, think carefully before asking them for a letter. Prioritize faculty who have seen you grow and can describe specific strengths.

Supporting your mental health

Continuous exposure to negative or toxic behaviors can lead to:

• Anxiety, insomnia, or depressed mood
• Loss of confidence and “impostor” feelings
• Cynicism about medicine as a career

Protective steps:

• Debrief with trusted peers (without violating confidentiality)
• Use institutional resources: many programs offer confidential counseling or an Employee Assistance Program.
• Engage in simple but real self‑care: protected sleep windows, short walks between cases, hydration, small rituals that remind you who you are outside of medicine.

If you find yourself thinking about quitting frequently or having thoughts of self‑harm, seek immediate help from a mental health professional, your program leadership, or crisis resources in your country. Distress from a toxic training environment is real and treatable.

Reframing for the long term

You did not choose which attendings you would train under—but you can choose how you integrate the experience:

• Note teaching behaviors you never want to replicate.
• Commit to being the attending who gives clear expectations and treats learners with dignity.
• Recognize that successfully navigating difficult attendings is itself a sign of professional maturity.

You are not defined by the worst person you’ve worked with.

---

FAQs: Managing Difficult Attendings in Residency

1. How do I know when an attending is just “tough” versus truly toxic?
A “tough” attending usually:

• Has high standards but links criticism to specific, improvable behaviors
• Shows some investment in your learning or patient care
• Adjusts behavior at least somewhat when you demonstrate effort and progress

A toxic attending physician often:

• Uses humiliation, threats, or personal attacks as a consistent pattern
• Dismisses or punishes feedback attempts
• Shows bias or discrimination
• Undermines patient safety or resident well‑being

Pattern, persistence, and impact on safety and dignity are key markers.

---

2. Should I confront a difficult attending directly, or always go through leadership?
It depends on severity and safety:

• For moderate issues (e.g., unclear expectations, sharp tone), a respectful 1:1 conversation can sometimes help.
• For severe issues (harassment, discrimination, safety concerns, retaliation), prioritize documenting and involving leadership rather than solo confrontation.

If you’re unsure, discuss with a chief resident or trusted mentor before deciding.

---

3. Will reporting a toxic attending hurt my chances in the residency match or fellowship applications?
Programs are legally and ethically expected to protect residents who report in good faith, and retaliation is prohibited. However, trainees often understandably worry about informal consequences.

To mitigate risk:

• Be factual and specific in your documentation.
• Use established reporting channels.
• Involve supportive faculty who know your work.
• When applying for fellowship, emphasize your clinical growth and professionalism; you generally don’t need to detail these conflicts unless directly relevant and framed constructively.

If you anticipate complex fallout, consider confidential guidance from GME, an ombudsperson, or legal counsel (e.g., via a house staff union or professional organization).

---

4. How can I talk about a difficult attending during interviews without sounding unprofessional?
If asked about a challenging situation with a supervisor:

• Focus on your behavior and learning, not their flaws.
• Example framing:
  “I worked with an attending whose feedback style was very abrupt and often public. I realized I needed to protect my learning, so I started asking for specific, private feedback, documenting teaching points, and debriefing with my chief resident about how to improve. I learned how to maintain professionalism under stress and how important psychological safety is to team performance.”

Avoid name‑dropping, venting, or making global statements about a specialty or institution.

---

Managing a difficult attending during residency is never easy, but it is navigable. By combining preparation, clear communication, strategic boundary setting, documentation, and thoughtful escalation, you protect your education, your patients, and your future career. The skills you build now—under some of the hardest circumstances—will shape the kind of attending you become for the next generation.