The Essential Guide for DO Graduates Researching Neurology Residency Programs

Understanding the Landscape: Neurology Residency for the DO Graduate

As a DO graduate targeting neurology residency, your program research strategy needs to be more deliberate than most. You are navigating:

• A competitive specialty (neurology)
• Variable program familiarity with osteopathic training
• Differences in how programs view COMLEX vs. USMLE
• A fully merged ACGME system that still has cultural remnants of the old MD/DO divide

To make a strong osteopathic residency match in neurology, you need to approach program research like a structured project, not casual browsing. That means:

1. Knowing what matters specifically for neurology
2. Identifying programs genuinely DO-friendly
3. Matching your profile to realistic AND aspirational tiers
4. Using data, not vibes, to build your list

This article walks you through a concrete, step‑by‑step approach to how to research residency programs in neurology as a DO graduate, with practical tools, examples, and specific red flags/green flags for the neuro match.

---

Step 1: Clarify Your Priorities as a DO Applicant in Neurology

Before you can start evaluating residency programs, you need a clear picture of what you need and what you want. For DO graduates, this is not identical to MD peers.

Think in terms of three buckets:

1.1 Objective Profile: Where You’re Competitive

Gather your “hard” data first:

• COMLEX Level 1/2 and (if taken) USMLE Step 1/2
• Neurology grades and honors
• Class rank or quartile (if available)
• Neurology‑related research, posters, or publications
• Neurology letters of recommendation (especially from academic neurologists)
• Away rotations or sub‑internships in neurology

Now ask:

• Are my scores near/above the average for matched neurology applicants?
• Do I have a clear signal of interest in neurology (research, electives, away rotations)?
• Are my letters likely to be strong and specialty‑specific?

This drives which tier of programs you can realistically target.

Example:

• COMLEX 1: 580, COMLEX 2: 610
• USMLE Step 2: 238
• Honors in neurology clerkship, one neurology elective, no away yet
• One neurology case report submitted

You’re likely competitive for a broad range of university‑affiliated and strong community programs, maybe a few mid‑tier academic programs, but may not be a strong candidate for the most research‑intense neuro residencies without additional scholarly work.

1.2 DO‑Specific Considerations

As a DO graduate, add to your checklist:

• Does the program explicitly accept COMLEX (if you didn’t take USMLE)?
• Does it list DOs in current or recent classes?
• Any former AOA/osteopathic programs in neurology you should prioritize?
• Are there neurology faculty who are DOs?

These factors directly impact your osteopathic residency match odds in neurology.

1.3 Personal & Lifestyle Priorities

Your program research strategy should include non‑academic filters too:

• Geography:
  • Close to family/partner?
  • Open to moving anywhere for the best training?
• Program size:
  • Smaller (3–4 residents/year) vs larger (7–10/year)
• Setting:
  • University/academic medical center
  • Hybrid university–community
  • Community‑based with academic affiliation
• Fellowship goals:
  • Vascular neurology, epilepsy, movement disorders, neurocritical care?
  • Or uncertain and want broad exposure?

Write these down. You’ll use them as filters when evaluating residency programs.

---

Step 2: Build a Master List and Sort Programs into Tiers

Once you know your priorities, you can start systematically identifying neurology residency programs.

2.1 Where to Find Neurology Programs

Use multiple sources together:

• FREIDA (AMA Residency & Fellowship Database)

  • Filter by: Specialty → Neurology
  • Then narrow by: State, Program Type, Size
  • Check DO percentage, test requirements, and visa policies (if relevant).

• NRMP and AAN Data (American Academy of Neurology)

  • Annual Charting Outcomes in the Match for Neurology
  • Shows matched DO characteristics, average scores, research numbers.

• Program Websites

  • Resident roster pages (look for DO graduates)
  • Curriculum and rotation sites
  • Faculty list and their subspecialties.

• Professional and Peer Networks

  • Residents from your school who matched neuro
  • Neurology interest group advisors
  • Neurology faculty with contacts at other institutions.

2.2 DO‑Specific Filters to Apply Early

As you build your list, mark each program with:

• DO presence

  • 0 = No current DOs observed
  • 1 = Occasional DOs in last 5–7 years
  • 2 = Regular DOs in multiple recent classes

• Exam acceptance

  • Accepts COMLEX only
  • Requires USMLE
  • Accepts both, but expresses preference?

• Previously osteopathic (pre‑merger) programs
  These former AOA neurology programs may be particularly DO‑friendly and deserve close attention if they align with your geography and training goals.

2.3 Tiering Programs: Reach, Target, Safety

Create a spreadsheet and divide programs into:

• Reach:

  • Program reputation significantly above your profile
  • Heavy research, top‑tier fellowships, or extremely competitive locations
  • You may have some but not all of their typical metrics.

• Target:

  • Your metrics match or slightly exceed their typical matched profiles
  • They have a history of taking DOs
  • You’d be reasonably excited to train there.

• Safety:

  • Your metrics are clearly above their typical matched profiles
  • Strong DO presence and acceptance of COMLEX
  • You would still be content training there.

Example Tiers for a DO Applicant:

• Reach:

  • Major name‑brand academic programs with NIH‑heavy neurology research, limited DOs historically, and strong fellowship networks.

• Target:

  • Solid university‑affiliated programs, mid‑size, with 10–40% DOs over recent classes.

• Safety:

  • Community‑based or smaller academic programs with multiple DOs per class and COMLEX‑friendly policies.

Plan to eventually apply to a mix of these categories, typically 30–40+ programs in neurology depending on your competitiveness and risk tolerance as a DO.

---

Step 3: Key Factors in Evaluating Neurology Residency Programs

After you’ve created your long list, dig deeper. This is where evaluating residency programs becomes more nuanced—especially in neurology.

3.1 Clinical Exposure and Case Mix

Neurology is highly dependent on case volume and diversity.

Questions to answer from websites, open houses, and residents:

• Does the program cover:
  • A large stroke population (comprehensive stroke center)?
  • Busy neuro ICU with ventilated patients and complex pathology?
  • Tertiary referrals for epilepsy, movement disorders, neuromuscular disease, MS, neuroimmunology, neuro‑oncology?
• Do residents get:
  • Plenty of acute stroke codes?
  • Exposure to EEG, EMG, and neuroimaging interpretation?
  • Outpatient neurology continuity clinic?

Actionable tip:
If the site mentions a Comprehensive Stroke Center, Level 4 Epilepsy Center, or accredited Neurocritical Care unit, that’s a sign of good exposure.

3.2 Educational Structure and Culture

You want a structured neurology education, not just service:

Look for:

• Daily or near‑daily conferences:
  • Morning report, neuroradiology conference, case conferences
  • Grand rounds, journal clubs, board review sessions
• Clearly outlined rotation schedule:
  • PGY‑2 heavy inpatient neurology exposure
  • PGY‑3 balance of inpatient and consult/neuro ICU
  • PGY‑4 with more electives, outpatient, and leadership
• Formal didactic curriculum that aligns with ABPN neurology boards

Ask during interviews or open houses:

• How often are residents pulled from teaching for service?
• Are conferences protected time?
• How do graduates perform on boards?

3.3 Fellowship and Career Outcomes

Even if you’re undecided on subspecialty, fellowship strength matters.

Research:

• Where do recent graduates go?
  • In‑house neurology fellowships?
  • External fellowships at respected centers?
• What fellowships exist locally?
  • Vascular neurology
  • Epilepsy / Clinical neurophysiology
  • Movement disorders
  • Neuromuscular
  • Neurocritical care
  • Headache, MS, behavioral neurology (less common)

Programs that can show a track record of placing residents in fellowships—including DO graduates—signal strong training and a good reputation in the neuro community.

3.4 Research Opportunities for Neurology

For DO graduates, research can help close perceived gaps in academic pedigree.

Check:

• Is there mandatory scholarly activity?
• Are there active neurology research projects? (stroke trials, epilepsy surgery outcomes, demyelinating disease registries, etc.)
• Are residents presenting at AAN, ANA, AES, ISC, or other major neurology meetings?
• Do any faculty have:
  • NIH or major grant funding?
  • Significant publication track records?

This matters more if you’re targeting academia or research‑intense fellowships, but even for a clinically focused career, research opportunities show the program values scholarly growth.

3.5 DO‑Friendliness and Culture

Because you’re a DO graduate, carefully evaluate:

• Current and recent residents:

  • How many DOs per class?
  • Any DOs in chief resident positions?

• Faculty composition:

  • Any DO neurologists on faculty (especially in leadership)?

• Program messaging:

  • Do they explicitly state “We accept COMLEX” or “We value osteopathic graduates”?

• Resident feedback:

  • On interviews, do DO residents feel supported and treated as equals?
  • Any sense of subtle second‑class treatment compared to MD grads?

Red flag:

• Programs that list “we strongly prefer USMLE scores” and have zero DOs in their resident roster for many years likely have an implicit (if not explicit) barrier.

Green flag:

• Programs with consistent DO representation, leadership roles for DOs, and publicly welcoming language for osteopathic applicants.

---

Step 4: Information Sources and a Concrete Program Research Strategy

To move from surface impressions to informed decisions, use a layered information approach.

4.1 What to Look For on Program Websites

Create a structured checklist to complete for each program:

• Basic structure:

  • Number of residents per year
  • Trauma level and stroke center status
  • Call schedule (home vs in‑house)
  • Rotation sites (main academic hospital vs multiple smaller sites)

• Curriculum:

  • PGY‑2/3/4 year breakdown
  • Required ICU, consult, outpatient, and elective blocks
  • Continuity clinic structure

• Faculty and subspecialties:

  • Are core neurology subspecialties represented?
  • Any world‑recognized names (if academia matters to you)?

• DO indicators:

  • Resident bios (MD vs DO)
  • Any explicit mention of COMLEX

Document everything in a spreadsheet. This allows side‑by‑side comparison when ranking and applying.

4.2 Using FREIDA and Public Data Meaningfully

FREIDA and other tools can support evaluating residency programs quantitatively:

• Number of:

  • Applicants interviewed per available position
  • International medical graduates (if you’re an IMG+DO)
  • Female residents (for diversity culture clues)

• DO percentage:

  • A higher DO percentage historically can correlate with a more inclusive environment for osteopathic graduates.

Use this data to:

• Adjust tiers (move some programs from “target” to “reach” or vice versa)
• Decide where you might send signal tokens (if used in your application cycle)

4.3 Leveraging Social Media, Virtual Open Houses, and Word of Mouth

Many neurology residency programs communicate heavily via:

• Twitter/X, Instagram, sometimes LinkedIn
• Residency‑run accounts that show:
  • Resident life and culture
  • Educational conferences
  • Research accomplishments
  • DEI initiatives

You can:

• Attend virtual open houses (often advertised on social media)
• Ask DO‑specific questions anonymously (or via email after)
• Gauge how approachable the program leadership feels

Also:

• Talk to neurology residents from your school or rotation sites
• Ask faculty:
  • “Where have DOs from our school matched neurology in the last 5 years?”
  • “Are there programs you think are particularly DO-friendly or less receptive?”

4.4 Using Away Rotations Strategically

For neurology, away rotations can:

• Show programs your clinical skill and professionalism
• Help minimize any bias regarding DO training quality
• Generate strong specialty‑specific letters

When choosing away rotations:

• Prioritize programs that:
  • Are in your realistic to reach tier
  • Have some history of taking DOs
  • You could see yourself ranking highly
• Be intentional:
  • One strong, well‑planned away rotation is often more valuable than multiple scattered ones.

After the rotation, stay in touch with faculty and residents—they’ll be your best sources of candid impressions when you finalize your rank list.

---

Step 5: Refining Your List and Preparing for the Neuro Match

With all data gathered, it’s time to refine your list for the osteopathic residency match in neurology.

5.1 Balance Risk and Volume

As a DO graduate, err slightly on the side of more applications, especially if:

• Your scores are near or below the neurology average
• You have fewer neurology‑specific experiences
• Your geographic preferences are narrow

A common distribution for a mid‑range DO candidate:

• 6–8 Reach programs
• 18–24 Target programs
• 10–15 Safety programs

Adjust up or down based on advising at your school and your specific metrics.

5.2 Organize for Interviews

During your research process, keep a living document where you note:

• Why you liked each program (specific, not generic reasons)
• Questions you still have about each:
  • Elective flexibility
  • DO support and culture
  • Fellowship placement for DO graduates
• Any red flags that appeared (e.g., repeated resident turnover, poor communication, no DO representation)

This will:

• Help you write tailored personal statements or supplemental responses
• Prepare you for interview questions like:
  • “Why are you interested in our program?”
  • “What are you looking for in a residency?”

5.3 Post‑Interview Re‑Evaluation

After interviews, your perception may change. Update your notes immediately afterwards:

• How did they respond when you disclosed you’re a DO (if it came up)?
• Did you meet any DO residents or faculty? How was their experience?
• Did the program leadership seem familiar with osteopathic training?
• Did they clearly understand COMLEX if you don’t have USMLE?

Use a structured ranking rubric:

• Clinical training: 1–5
• Education and mentorship: 1–5
• DO friendliness: 1–5
• Geography and lifestyle: 1–5
• “Gut feeling” after interview: 1–5

Your rank list should then blend your pre‑research data with your lived interview impressions.

---

Common Pitfalls DO Graduates Should Avoid in Neuro Program Research

Over‑relying on Reputation Alone

Well‑known does not always mean well‑fit, especially if:

• The program has minimal DO presence
• The culture is rigid or dismissive
• Hands‑on training is overshadowed by service demands

A mid‑tier academic program that respects DOs and trains excellent clinicians may be far better for you than a name‑brand institution where you feel like an outsider.

Under‑applying to DO‑friendly Programs

Some DO graduates:

• Focus too heavily on historically MD‑heavy programs
• Underestimate how much DO‑friendly programs value osteopathic applicants

Identify a solid core of DO‑friendly neurology residencies that still offer strong clinical and fellowship outcomes.

Ignoring Personal Needs and Burnout Risk

Good neurology training is demanding. If you ignore:

• Location preferences (support system)
• Call burden vs resilience level
• Wellness resources and schedule protections

you risk burnout that can overshadow even the best academic training.

---

Putting It All Together: A Practical Example

Imagine you are a DO graduate with:

• COMLEX 1: 565, COMLEX 2: 590
• No USMLE
• Honors in neurology rotation, one neurology elective
• One poster at AAN, one neurology‑focused QI project
• Want to stay in the Midwest if possible
• Interested in stroke or neurocritical care, unsure about academic vs community practice

Your program research strategy might look like this:

1. Initial filters (FREIDA + websites):

   • All neurology residencies in the Midwest
   • Add some programs on the East Coast/South as backup

2. DO‑specific sorting:

   • Flag all programs that:
     • Explicitly accept COMLEX without USMLE
     • Have at least 1–2 DOs in the last 5 years

3. Tiering:

   • Reach:
     • Large Midwest academic center with NIH‑funded stroke research, limited DOs
   • Target:
     • University‑affiliated programs with neuro ICU and comprehensive stroke centers, visible DO residents
   • Safety:
     • Strong community‑based programs with consistent DO representation and critical care rotations

4. Deep evaluation:

   • Review each program’s:
     • Stroke and neuro ICU exposure
     • Faculty in vascular neurology or neurocritical care
     • Resident outcomes (stroke or neuro‑ICU fellowships)

5. Action steps:

   • Choose 1–2 away rotations at target programs that appear DO‑friendly and strong in stroke/ICU
   • Attend virtual open houses for 5–7 more programs
   • Finalize a list of ~35–40 programs across all tiers

This structured approach moves you from guesswork to strategic targeting tailored to your DO background and neurology goals.

---

FAQs: Researching Neurology Residency Programs as a DO Graduate

1. Do I need to take USMLE in addition to COMLEX to match neurology as a DO?
Not universally, but it helps. Some neurology programs require USMLE or heavily prefer it. Others truly accept COMLEX alone. If you have already taken COMLEX only and performed well, focus your research on programs that explicitly accept COMLEX and show a track record of matching DOs. If you’re early in training and can still choose, taking USMLE Step 2 (now that Step 1 is pass/fail) can open additional doors in the neuro match.

---

2. How can I tell if a program is genuinely DO‑friendly and not just “DO‑tolerant”?
Look beyond the website’s generic inclusivity statements. True DO‑friendly programs typically have:

• Multiple DOs in recent residency classes
• DOs serving as chiefs or in leadership roles
• DO neurologists on faculty
• Clear, written acceptance of COMLEX
• DO residents who, when you speak with them, describe being fully included and supported

If a program has zero DOs, no DO faculty, and vague comments about “considering COMLEX on a case‑by‑case basis,” that’s likely less DO‑friendly.

---

3. How much does neurology research matter for DO applicants?
Research is not mandatory to match neurology, but it can be helpful, especially for DO applicants aiming at more academic or competitive programs. Having:

• A few neurology‑related posters or case reports
• Participation in QI or clinical projects
• Presentations at local or national neurology meetings

signals genuine interest and helps counter any misconceptions about osteopathic training. However, strong clinical performance, excellent letters, and neurology commitment can still carry many DO applicants successfully into solid programs even with limited research.

---

4. Should I prioritize former osteopathic (AOA) neurology programs?
They’re often an excellent starting point, particularly if:

• You want an environment experienced in training DOs
• You prioritize COMLEX acceptance
• You value osteopathic culture and mentorship

However, don’t limit yourself to these programs alone. Many historically MD‑based neurology residencies have become increasingly DO‑friendly. Use former AOA programs as a core but not the entirety of your list, unless your advising team feels your application is especially limited.

---

By approaching the neuro match with a deliberate, data‑driven program research strategy and an eye toward DO‑friendly environments, you significantly increase your chances of landing in a neurology residency where you’ll be challenged, supported, and prepared for the career you want.