Your Ultimate Guide to Researching EM-IM Residency Programs for MD Graduates

Understanding the EM-IM Niche: Why Your Program Research Matters More

Emergency Medicine-Internal Medicine (EM IM combined) residencies are a small, highly specialized niche in graduate medical education. As an MD graduate residency applicant coming from an allopathic medical school, you’re already familiar with the basics of the allopathic medical school match—but EM-IM adds extra layers of complexity and strategy.

Before you dive into how to research residency programs, it’s crucial to understand why targeted, methodical program research is especially important for this pathway:

• Limited number of programs: There are far fewer EM-IM combined programs than categorical EM or IM programs. Every application choice matters.
• Highly variable training models: Some programs are more EM-heavy early on, others more IM-heavy; continuity clinic, ICU exposure, and elective structures differ significantly.
• Different cultures and career outcomes: Some EM-IM combined programs are tailored toward academic careers, others toward community leadership, critical care, or administrative roles.
• Dual-board preparation: You need to confirm how well each program prepares you for both ABEM and ABIM boards and what support systems exist.

A strong program research strategy helps you:

• Avoid “wasting” applications on programs that don’t fit your goals or profile.
• Prioritize programs where your background (US MD or IMG, Step scores, research, interests) aligns with typical matched residents.
• Craft stronger, program-specific personal statements and interview talking points.
• Rank intelligently, balancing prestige, training quality, and lifestyle.

The rest of this guide will walk you through a step-by-step framework for evaluating residency programs in EM-IM combined disciplines and building a targeted, evidence-based application list.

---

Step 1: Clarify Your Career Goals and Non‑Negotiables

Before you open a single program website, you need clarity on what you want. This will shape how you research and evaluate residency programs.

Define Your Long-Term Career Vision

Ask yourself:

• Clinical scope

  • Do you envision practicing primarily as an emergency physician, internist, or a true hybrid?
  • Are you drawn to critical care, hospitalist medicine, ED administration, or academic EM/IM?

• Practice setting

  • Academic tertiary center vs. high-volume community hospital vs. mixed model?
  • Urban, suburban, or rural setting?

• Academic and leadership interests

  • Do you want to do research, QI, health systems leadership, or medical education?
  • Are you aiming for fellowship (e.g., critical care, toxicology, ultrasound, palliative, admin)?

Specific goals help you rapidly filter programs. For example:

• If you’re sure you want critical care fellowship, you should prioritize EM-IM programs with strong ICU exposure, dual-boarding alumni in CCM, and established fellowship pipelines.
• If you want ED/hospital administration, look for tracks or mentors in operations, quality, or health policy.

Identify Your Personal and Lifestyle Priorities

Your satisfaction during residency isn’t just about brand name or case volume. Consider:

• Geography: Regions you must be in (family, partner’s job, visa issues) vs. those you’d prefer to avoid.
• Cost of living: Urban coastal vs. Midwest/South; salary relative to housing and commute.
• Support systems: Proximity to family/friends, partner’s ability to find work.
• Schedule and wellness culture: How programs talk about duty hours, backup coverage, mental health, and parental leave.

Make three lists:

1. Non-negotiables (e.g., “Must be in Northeast or Midwest,” “Must have strong critical care experience,” “Must support couples match.”)
2. High-priority wants (e.g., “Academic center,” “Established EM-IM alumni network,” “Robust ultrasound training.”)
3. Nice-to-haves (e.g., “Near outdoor recreation,” “Large EM-IM resident cohort,” “Global health opportunities.”)

You’ll use these later as a scoring rubric when evaluating residency programs.

---

Step 2: Build a Comprehensive Program List Before You Narrow It

Once your priorities are clear, start building a complete list of EM-IM combined programs to research. This prevents you from missing strong options simply because they’re less well-known.

Use Official and High-Yield Data Sources

Start with these:

• ERAS / FREIDA (AMA Residency & Fellowship Database)
  • Filter by specialty: “Emergency Medicine-Internal Medicine” or “Internal Medicine/Emergency Medicine” combined.
  • Note: Some EM-IM combined programs may be listed under Internal Medicine or Emergency Medicine umbrella—check both.
• NRMP Program Directory
  • Verify which EM IM combined programs actually participate in the allopathic medical school match each cycle and the NRMP codes (EM vs IM-based).

Cross-reference to ensure:

• The program is currently active (combined programs can occasionally close or pause recruitment).
• The program offers categorical EM-IM combined positions, not just EM or IM with extra EM exposure.

Create a Working Spreadsheet

To maintain a solid program research strategy, build a spreadsheet with columns like:

• Program name
• Institution / hospital system
• City, state, region
• Number of EM-IM positions per year
• Length of training (typically 5 years)
• Primary training sites (academic vs community)
• EM vs IM home department reputation
• Key features (fellowships, tracks, etc.)
• Website link
• Application requirements (USMLE/COMLEX cutoffs, visa policies)
• Fit score (you will update this later)

This document becomes your central hub as you’re researching residency programs across the season.

---

Step 3: Deep-Dive Into Program Websites and Official Data

Now shift from “what exists” to “what each program truly offers.” This is where you begin evaluating residency programs in a more nuanced way.

Decode the Curriculum Structure

On each program’s website, focus on these points:

• Year-by-year schedule

  • How are the five years divided between EM and IM?
  • Are EM and IM blocks front-loaded or interleaved?
  • How many overall months in ED, wards, ICU, electives?

• Critical care and high-acuity exposure

  • Number of ICU months on both EM and IM sides (MICU, CCU, SICU, Neuro, etc.).
  • Trauma center designation (Level I vs II vs community).
  • ED volume and acuity: number of annual visits; presence of trauma, stroke, STEMI programs.

• Continuity clinic structure

  • How is internal medicine continuity clinic scheduled across five years?
  • What is the patient population (urban underserved, insured, mixed)?
  • Who supervises (academic IM faculty vs community internal medicine)?

• Electives and tracks

  • Are there dedicated EM-IM electives?
  • Can you do away rotations or electives such as ultrasound, toxicology, administration, global health, EMS, palliative, or point-of-care research?

When comparing EM IM combined programs, look for patterns that match your goals. For example:

• If you want balanced dual practice, favor programs with relatively even EM and IM exposure each year and robust inpatient and ED responsibilities.
• If you’re targeting academic EM research, prioritize programs with:
  • Protected research time or scholarly tracks
  • Strong EM departments with funded investigators
  • A history of graduates matching into fellowships or obtaining academic appointments

Analyze Resident and Faculty Profiles

Program websites may list:

• Current EM-IM residents
• Recent alumni and their current positions
• Faculty with EM-IM backgrounds
• Dual-appointed or EM-IM core faculty advisors

Study these carefully:

• Resident backgrounds

  • Mostly US MDs vs DOs vs IMGs?
  • Typical Step scores or AOA/Gold Humanism presence (if hinted indirectly via bios)?
  • Geographic trends (e.g., many from local med schools vs nationwide draw)?

• Alumni outcomes

  • How many graduates practice as dual EM/IM attendings?
  • How many went into fellowships (critical care, palliative, tox, ultrasound, administration)?
  • Academic vs community distribution?

• Faculty interests

  • Look for faculty with clear EM-IM or hospital/ED medicine leadership roles.
  • Check for faculty leading sections such as observation medicine, ED flow, or ICU medical direction.

If you see multiple EM-IM faculty in leadership or with dual appointments in EM and IM, that’s a strong sign the program values and understands the unique trajectory of EM-IM residents.

Use FREIDA, NRMP, and Institutional Data

Beyond the website, look for:

• FREIDA details

  • Average duty hours
  • Program size and number of trainees
  • Percent board pass rates (if reported)
  • Benefits (salary, vacation, conference funding)

• Institutional quality markers

  • US News or Doximity rankings are imperfect but can hint at overall academic reputation.
  • Magnet status, Level I trauma, tertiary referral center vs community hospital.

This is also where an MD graduate residency applicant can begin to gauge whether a program is realistic from a competitiveness standpoint.

---

Step 4: Use a Structured System to Evaluate and Compare Programs

Without structure, program research quickly becomes overwhelming. Adopting a scoring/ranking system helps you make consistent, rational comparisons.

Create a Personal Scoring Rubric

Using your earlier non-negotiables and priorities, assign each program scores (e.g., 1–5) in categories such as:

1. Training Quality

   • ED volume and acuity
   • ICU exposure and critical care depth
   • Diversity of pathology
   • Supervision vs autonomy balance

2. EM-IM Integration

   • Presence of EM-IM leadership and mentors
   • Dedicated EM-IM conferences or tracks
   • Structural integration vs feeling like “two separate residencies”

3. Career Support

   • Fellowship match record
   • Academic vs community career preparation
   • Support for research, QI, leadership roles

4. Program Culture and Wellness

   • Resident testimonials (from website, social media, forums)
   • Backup coverage policies
   • Approach to work-hour violations and wellness initiatives

5. Location and Lifestyle

   • Geographic preference fit
   • Cost of living
   • Commuting burden, call room quality, parking, safety

6. Competitiveness Fit

   • How your academic metrics (USMLE/COMLEX, grades, SLOEs, research) compare to typical matched residents.
   • Visa sponsorship details if applicable (J-1 vs H-1B).

Each category can be weighted differently depending on your personal priorities. For example, you might weight “Training Quality” and “EM-IM Integration” more heavily than “Location,” or vice versa.

Example: Comparing Two Hypothetical EM-IM Programs

Suppose you’re primarily interested in critical care and academic leadership.

• Program A

  • Located in a major city, Level I trauma center.
  • 12+ months of ICU time; strong IM and EM critical care faculty.
  • Several past graduates in dual-boarded critical care roles at academic centers.
  • EM-IM program director is dual-boarded and heavily involved in QI research.
  • Cost of living high; schedule intense but well-supported.

• Program B

  • Mid-sized city with Level II trauma.
  • Fewer ICU rotations; more general medicine floor time.
  • Most graduates go into community ED jobs or hospitalist roles.
  • No EM-IM faculty; EM-IM residents split between EM and IM leadership.
  • Cost of living low; strong sense of community.

Your rubric might give Program A a 5 for Training Quality and Career Support, but lower on Location; Program B might win on Lifestyle but score lower on EM-IM Integration and academic support. This helps clarify which trade-offs you’re willing to accept.

---

Step 5: Go Beyond the Website – Insider Intel and Direct Contact

Program websites show the curated surface. To truly understand how to research residency programs effectively, you must go beyond official materials.

Leverage Mentors and Alumni

Your strongest source of honest insight will often be people who know both you and the programs:

• Home EM and IM faculty

  • Ask EM and IM attendings if they know EM IM combined programs and can comment on reputation and culture.
  • Inquire whether they have former residents or colleagues at those institutions.

• Advisors and deans

  • Many allopathic medical schools maintain internal data on where previous MD graduates matched, including EM-IM.
  • Advisors can tell you if a program is historically receptive to your school’s graduates.

• Alumni networks

  • Ask your medical school or EM/IM departments to connect you with alumni currently in EM-IM residences.
  • Use LinkedIn or institution directories to identify EM-IM graduates and respectfully request short informational conversations.

Ask targeted questions like:

• “How integrated do you feel between EM and IM?”
• “Do EM-IM residents get equal respect and opportunities in both departments?”
• “What changes would you make to the program if you could?”
• “If you had to choose again, would you pick this program?”

Attend Virtual or In-Person Open Houses

Many programs now offer:

• Virtual info sessions
• EM-IM-specific Q&A events
• Pre-interview webinars

These events are valuable to:

• Hear how leadership describes program strengths and challenges.
• Observe resident–faculty dynamics (Are residents candid? Do they speak up?)
• Ask specific questions about:
  • EM-IM schedule integration
  • Research and leadership opportunities
  • Support for fellowships
  • Wellness, backup, and remediation policies

Keep a note: programs that consistently avoid specific questions or give vague answers may warrant caution.

Use Online Forums Strategically (and Skeptically)

You may find discussions on:

• Student Doctor Network (SDN)
• Reddit r/medicalschool or r/residency
• Specialty-specific forums

Approach these with caution:

• Single anonymous posts—positive or negative—should not be your sole basis for judging a program.
• Look for consistent trends (e.g., multiple independent mentions of high burnout, poor communication, or, conversely, strong mentorship and autonomy).

Use online anecdotes as prompts for deeper questions you’ll ask current residents or on interview day, not as final verdicts.

---

Step 6: Tailor Your Program Research Strategy to Your Profile

Not every MD graduate residency applicant will approach EM IM combined programs the same way. Your background shapes your optimal strategy.

For US MD Graduates (Allopathic Medical School Match Focus)

As a US MD graduate, you may have more flexibility in program choice, but EM-IM remains competitive. Focus on:

• Identifying realistic reach, target, and safety programs

  • Reach: highly academic EM IM combined programs with strong research/fellowship pipelines.
  • Target: solid university or university-affiliated programs with balanced clinical training.
  • Safety: programs historically matching broader academic profiles.

• Aligning your application materials

  • EM and IM letters that specifically mention your suitability for dual training.
  • A personal statement that clearly explains why EM-IM (not just EM or IM alone).

Your research helps you highlight program-specific features in your application (e.g., critical care focus, dual leadership, strong ultrasound, or QI programs).

For DO or IMG Applicants

Though your question is framed for MD graduates, many DOs and IMGs pursue EM-IM. Program research must include:

• Confirming program openness

  • Explicit statements on DO/IMG acceptance.
  • Past residents’ backgrounds (are any DOs or IMGs listed in current or past EM-IM cohorts?).

• Score and visa thresholds

  • USMLE/COMLEX score expectations (even if not posted, ask mentors or residents).
  • J-1 vs H-1B support; some EM IM combined programs may have stricter limits due to dual accreditation and departmental constraints.

Here, evaluating residency programs means honestly asking: “Where is my profile most likely to be competitive and valued?”

---

Step 7: Finalizing Your Application List and Preparing for Interviews

By now, you’ve done the hard work of how to research residency programs. The final step is to convert that research into an actionable plan.

Narrow Down and Tier Your List

From your spreadsheet and scoring rubric:

1. Remove programs that clearly fail your non-negotiables.
2. Rank remaining programs roughly into:
   • Top Tier (dream but realistic)
   • Middle Tier (strong fit, likely interview)
   • Lower Tier (safety or compromise on some preferences)

Ensure your final list:

• Has enough programs to give you a solid match probability in EM-IM plus any backup strategies (e.g., separate EM or IM applications, combined vs categorical).
• Reflects geographic and institutional diversity to hedge against unpredictable interview patterns.

Use Your Research to Strengthen Interviews and Rank List

During interviews:

• Reference specific aspects of the program you discovered in your research (“I was really impressed by the way your EM-IM curriculum integrates ICU months in PGY-2 and PGY-3, and how several alumni matched into critical care.”).
• Ask nuanced questions that show insight:
  • “How do EM-IM residents balance identity between the two departments?”
  • “Can you describe a recent change made in response to EM-IM resident feedback?”
  • “How have your EM-IM graduates been supported in pursuing [fellowship/administration/dual practice]?”

After interviews:

• Update your spreadsheet with your gut impressions, pros and cons, and any new data you learned.
• Re-score programs if needed, especially in culture and mentorship categories.
• Use all of this to build a thoughtful, data-informed rank list that reflects both objective quality and your subjective fit.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. How many EM-IM programs should an MD graduate apply to?

There’s no universal number, but most EM-IM applicants apply broadly because the total number of programs and positions is relatively small. Many MD graduates will:

• Apply to most or all EM-IM combined programs where they are geographically and competitively comfortable.
• Consider a backup strategy (e.g., separate EM or IM applications) depending on competitiveness and risk tolerance.

Your final number should balance cost, time, and the reality that EM-IM is a niche field.

2. How important is the “name” or prestige of the institution for EM-IM?

Prestige can matter more for academic careers and competitive fellowships, but it is not everything. For EM-IM:

• Training quality, case mix, and EM-IM integration often matter more than pure name recognition.
• Strong community or university-affiliated programs can produce excellent dual-trained physicians with robust outcomes.
• When evaluating residency programs, prioritize clinical and mentorship fit over rankings alone.

3. What are red flags when researching EM-IM residency programs?

Possible red flags include:

• Very limited or absent EM-IM information on the website (suggesting low visibility or support).
• No EM-IM faculty or clear dual-department leadership.
• Consistent online or word-of-mouth reports of burnout, lack of support, or high attrition.
• Unwillingness of residents or faculty to answer specific questions about workload, wellness, or EM-IM identity.
• Lack of clarity about board pass rates or post-residency outcomes.

Any one factor is not definitive, but multiple concerns together should prompt caution.

4. How can I show programs that I am specifically committed to EM-IM, not just undecided between EM and IM?

You can demonstrate this in several ways:

• Personal statement: Clearly articulate why dual training uniquely fits your career goals, rather than sounding like you “couldn’t choose.”
• Letters of recommendation: Secure strong letters from both EM and IM that explicitly comment on your suitability for combined training.
• Experiences: Highlight activities bridging acute care and longitudinal medicine (e.g., ICU rotations, ED-based longitudinal projects, QI in transitions of care).
• Interview conversations: Reference your program research, discuss EM-IM-specific career goals (e.g., ED-based observation units, critical care, hospital administration), and ask sophisticated questions about EM-IM culture and integration.

Showing that you’ve done deep, targeted research on EM IM combined programs itself signals seriousness and maturity as an applicant.

---

By approaching your search with clear goals, structured evaluation, and strategic use of available data and networks, you’ll transform a daunting process into a deliberate, informed program research strategy—and greatly increase your chances of finding an EM-IM residency that fits both who you are now and the physician you’re aiming to become.