How to Research Radiation Oncology Residency Programs: A Complete Guide

Understanding the Landscape of Radiation Oncology Residency

Radiation oncology is a small, highly specialized field. That makes researching programs both easier (fewer options) and trickier (big differences between programs, and limited public data). A thoughtful program research strategy is essential if you want a successful rad onc match and a training environment that fits your goals.

Before you dive into spreadsheets and websites, clarify three core realities about radiation oncology residency:

1. It’s a small specialty.

   • Fewer programs and positions compared with internal medicine or surgery.
   • You’re more likely to know or meet people connected within the field.
   • Reputation, mentorship, and “fit” can have outsized impact.

2. Programs vary more than they appear on paper.

   • Case mix, technology, and research expectations differ markedly.
   • Resident culture and workload can vary despite similar length and structure.

3. Your priorities matter as much as “prestige.”

   • Strong training exists at both big-name and smaller programs.
   • Career goals (academics vs community practice, research intensity, geographic constraints) should drive how you evaluate residency programs.

The goal of this guide is to walk you through a practical, step-by-step approach for how to research residency programs in radiation oncology so that every application and interview you pursue is purposeful.

---

Step 1: Define Your Priorities and Career Goals

Before you look at a single program website, take time to clarify what you want. A clear sense of direction will help you filter information and avoid being swayed by name recognition alone.

Clarify Your Career Direction

Ask yourself:

• Do I see myself in academic radiation oncology, community practice, hybrid practice, or am I truly unsure?
• How important is research to me? (No interest, some interest, or plan to be an independently funded investigator?)
• Do I want to develop a niche area of expertise (e.g., pediatrics, stereotactic radiosurgery, brachytherapy, global oncology, health services research)?

Your answers will influence which attributes matter most when evaluating residency programs:

• Aspiring academic oncologists may prioritize:

  • Strong research infrastructure (basic, translational, clinical, or outcomes research)
  • Dedicated research time (e.g., 6–12 months)
  • Track record of fellows and faculty obtaining grants (K awards, R01s, etc.)
  • Robust mentorship and national presence (conference presentations, guideline committees)

• Aspiring community practitioners may prioritize:

  • High clinical volume and broad case exposure
  • Training in efficiency, workflow, and multi-modality coordination
  • Practical skills (contouring, planning, managing toxicity, community outreach)
  • Programs with strong ties to regional practices

Identify Your Personal Constraints

Radiation oncology is a long road—4 years of residency after a preliminary year—so geography and personal life matter.

Reflect on:

• Geographic ties: Partners, family, children, visas, or other commitments
• Lifestyle preferences: Urban vs suburban vs rural; cost of living; climate
• Support systems: Proximity to family or friends, especially if you value that during residency

Create a short list (1–2 paragraphs or bullet points) of your top non‑negotiables and “strong preferences.” For example:

• Non‑negotiable:
  • Must be in the Northeast due to partner’s job
  • Sponsor or support visas (if applicable)
• Strong preferences:
  • Research time ≥ 6 months
  • Broad technology (IMRT/VMAT, SBRT, HDR brachytherapy)

Having this written down will keep you grounded once you start comparing programs.

---

Step 2: Build a Structured List of Programs to Research

Once you have your priorities, you can move from vague browsing to a concrete program research strategy.

Start with Official Sources

Use centralized directories to generate an initial list:

• FREIDA (AMA Residency & Fellowship Database)
  Filter by:

  • Specialty: Radiation Oncology
  • Region/State
  • Program size
    FREIDA offers basic facts (positions, accreditation status, some demographics).

• ERAS / AAMC program lists
  Check participating rad onc programs for the application cycle; occasionally, new programs appear or old ones close.

• NRMP data
  Past years’ match statistics can provide insight into competitiveness (though they are not program-specific).

Create a preliminary spreadsheet with:

• Program name
• City/State
• Institution/health system
• Number of residents per year
• Contact information
• Website link

Layer on Initial Filters

Apply your must-haves:

• Geography (e.g., West Coast only; major metro; Southeast excluded)
• Visa sponsorship if needed
• Minimum class size (some prefer at least 2–3 residents per year)
• Presence/absence of certain features (e.g., no brachytherapy → exclude if that’s a priority)

This initial pass narrows the field to a workable list for deeper research—often 20–40 programs depending on your constraints.

---

Step 3: How to Research Residency Programs Using Public Information

Now that you have an initial list, it’s time to gather richer data. This is where you begin truly evaluating residency programs instead of just naming them.

Use Program Websites Strategically

Program websites vary in quality and completeness, but you can extract a lot if you know what to look for. As you review each radiation oncology residency site, focus on:

1. Curriculum and Rotations

• How is the 4-year curriculum structured (disease-site rotations, block length)?
• Is there protected research time? If so, how much and in which years?
• Are there elective rotations (e.g., proton therapy, pediatric oncology, global health, dosimetry/physics, away electives)?
• Is there cross-training with medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiology, palliative care?

2. Faculty and Leadership

• Size and subspecialty coverage of the faculty:
  • Are there dedicated experts for all major disease sites (breast, GU, GI, lung, CNS, H&N, GYN, pediatrics)?
  • Any notable leaders in national organizations (ASTRO, NRG, etc.)?
• Are faculty profiles detailed?
  • Publications, clinical interests, ongoing trials, leadership roles

3. Technology and Clinical Capabilities Look for:

• Linear accelerators (how many; what types; age if listed)
• Advanced modalities:
  • IMRT/VMAT, SBRT/SRS, IGRT, adaptive radiotherapy
  • Proton therapy (on-site or via rotation)
  • Brachytherapy: HDR, LDR, prostate seeds, GYN, other sites
• Treatment planning systems, record-and-verify systems, and imaging (MRI, PET-CT, 4D CT)
• Special programs: pediatric radiation oncology, re-irradiation clinics, MR-linac, intraoperative radiotherapy

4. Resident Experience

• Resident complement (number per year; total)
• Call responsibilities (home vs in-house; frequency; weekend coverage)
• Didactics:
  • Formal lecture schedule, physics and biology teaching
  • Contouring rounds, chart rounds, case conferences, journal clubs
• Board pass rates if published
• Wellness and support:
  • Retreats, mentorship systems, resident feedback processes

5. Outcomes and Alumni Some programs list:

• Fellowships or first jobs of recent graduates
• Academic appointments, leadership roles, notable alumni
• This is especially valuable for gauging:
  • Academic vs community practice trajectory
  • Geographic dispersion of graduates (if you want to stay local vs move)

As you go, enter data into your comparison spreadsheet with structured fields (e.g., 0–3 rating for research, technology, culture based on available info).

Supplement with Institutional and Departmental Sites

Radiation oncology residency pages may not capture all opportunities at the host institution. Check:

• Cancer center website
  • NCI designation (Comprehensive Cancer Center vs non-NCI)
  • Clinical trial portfolio
  • Multidisciplinary programs (breast center, lung cancer center, etc.)
• Department of Radiation Oncology main site
  • Descriptions of clinical programs and technology
  • Featured news (new machines, new faculty, major research awards)
  • Evidence of growth and institutional support

These sites give you a sense of stability, expansion vs contraction, and the department’s vision.

Use PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov

If research matters to you, you should independently verify productivity:

• Search for:

  • “[Institution] radiation oncology” on PubMed or Google Scholar
  • Identify top publishing faculty in your areas of interest.
  • Note whether research is mainly clinical, translational, physics, or outcomes-based.

• Check ClinicalTrials.gov:

  • Search by institution for active radiation oncology trials.
  • More trials typically suggest stronger clinical research infrastructure.

Add columns in your spreadsheet for:

• Research intensity: Low / Moderate / High
• Active trials: Few / Some / Many
• Match between your interests and the program’s strengths

---

Step 4: Evaluate Program Culture and Resident Fit

Culture is harder to quantify, but it often determines whether residents thrive. Because radiation oncology is a small specialty, your colleagues and mentors will shape your professional identity and network.

Interpret Resident Lists and Photos Thoughtfully

Most programs list current residents. Consider:

• Class size and stability
  • Any evidence of frequent attrition or unexplained vacancies?
• Diversity
  • Visible diversity in gender, race/ethnicity, and training background
• Residency leadership roles
  • Chief residents, resident councils, wellness committees

You can sometimes infer whether residents appear genuinely engaged and supported based on how they are featured.

Use Social Media and Online Footprints

Many rad onc departments and residents are active on:

• Twitter/X
• LinkedIn
• Instagram

What to look for:

• Are residents visible, presenting at conferences, winning awards?
• Do faculty promote residents’ work, suggesting mentorship and advocacy?
• Departmental posts about education, resident achievements, and wellness events

Avoid over-interpreting isolated posts, but patterns across months/years are informative.

Talk to People: Mentors, Alumni, and Peers

One of the most effective ways to research radiation oncology residency programs is simply to ask.

Use your home institution wisely:

• If you have a home rad onc department:
  • Meet with program leadership or faculty; ask about different programs’ strengths.
  • Request introductions to alumni now in residency or early practice.
• If you don’t have home rad onc:
  • Seek mentors via away rotations, research projects, national societies (e.g., ASTRO), or virtual mentorship programs.

Key questions to ask trusted mentors or alumni:

• “Which programs are particularly strong for [research/clinical training/brachytherapy/protons]?”
• “Are there programs you’d describe as ‘hidden gems’?”
• “Have you heard concerns about resident support or departmental stability anywhere?”
• “What program characteristics would you prioritize if you were matching again today?”

Document what you hear, but always treat individual opinions as data points—not absolute truth.

Red Flags and Green Flags for Culture

Green flags:

• Residents frequently publish and present with multiple faculty.
• Alumni speak enthusiastically about mentorship and autonomy.
• Program leadership is stable and visible in resident education.
• Clear mechanisms for feedback and program improvement.

Red flags (especially if multiple sources confirm them):

• High resident turnover or frequent mentions of residents leaving mid-program.
• Recurrent complaints about unresponsive leadership or toxic culture.
• Persistent rumors of under-staffing, financial instability, or threatened closures.
• Little to no evidence of recent resident achievements (conferences, publications).

Because the rad onc match pool is small, it’s often possible to triangulate a reasonably accurate picture from a few conversations.

---

Step 5: Deep-Dive Comparison: How to Evaluate Programs Side-by-Side

Once you’ve gathered data, the key is to compare programs in a way that reflects your priorities. This is where your structured spreadsheet becomes powerful.

Build a Comparison Framework

Consider assigning 0–3 or 0–5 scores for each category:

1. Clinical Breadth and Volume

   • Variety of disease sites and modalities
   • Exposure to complex cases vs routine bread-and-butter oncology
   • Pediatric and proton therapy access if relevant

2. Technology and Innovation

   • Diversity and modernity of equipment
   • Access to advanced techniques (SBRT/SRS, HDR brachy, MR‑linac, adaptive RT)

3. Research Environment

   • Protected time and mentorship
   • Track record of resident publications and presentations
   • Grants and trials infrastructure

4. Education and Mentorship

   • Structured didactics, board prep, and physics/biology teaching
   • Faculty accessibility and mentorship culture
   • Board pass rates if available

5. Program Culture and Support

   • Resident satisfaction from informal reports
   • Wellness, support services, and responsiveness to feedback
   • Diversity and inclusivity initiatives

6. Location and Lifestyle

   • Cost of living, commute, housing options
   • Partner job market, proximity to family/friends
   • Overall livability for 4+ years

7. Career Outcomes

   • Where graduates go (academia, community, fellowships)
   • Alignment with your career goals

You don’t need a rigid formula, but numerical scoring can help reveal patterns and separate truly strong fits from marginal options.

Use Case Examples

Example 1: Research-Oriented Applicant

• Priorities: 12 months of protected research, strong basic/translational science, NCI-designated center.
• Program A:
  • 12 months research in PGY-4, abundant lab options, multiple K awardees.
  • Moderate cost of living, large city, heavy call.
• Program B:
  • 4 months research, mostly retrospective clinical work, no lab-based rad onc faculty.
  • Low cost of living, smaller city, lighter call.

A research-focused candidate might rank Program A far higher despite heavier workload because it aligns with long-term academic goals.

Example 2: Community-Practice-Oriented Applicant

• Priorities: High clinical volume, practical autonomy, diverse bread-and-butter case mix.
• Program C:
  • Moderate research, lots of complex tertiary referral cases, less exposure to common community presentations.
• Program D:
  • Busy regional cancer network, community satellite rotations, strong mentorship in practice management.

Here, Program D may be the better choice even if Program C has more academic prestige.

The key is to consistently ask:
“Which program will best prepare me for the specific career I want?”

---

Step 6: Refine Your List Before Applying and Interviewing

You can’t apply everywhere, and you shouldn’t. A thoughtful pre-application filter saves time, money, and energy.

Tiers of Interest

After your analysis, group programs into informal tiers:

• Tier 1: Ideal Fit

  • Meets most or all of your key criteria.
  • Strong match between department strengths and your goals.
  • You would be genuinely excited to train there.

• Tier 2: Good Fit

  • Meets many criteria, may lack one or two major features.
  • Solid training, but slightly less optimal location or research fit.

• Tier 3: Acceptable Backup

  • Adequate training but with significant trade-offs.
  • May be more of a “safety” option, but still places where you could be happy.

If you have serious concerns (e.g., repeated red flags, unstable department), consider removing the program entirely rather than treating it as a safety.

Contact Programs Thoughtfully (Optional)

In some situations, brief, targeted outreach can help clarify questions or express genuine interest:

• If you have geographic ties or a strong specific interest (e.g., “I’m very interested in your proton therapy program and ongoing trials in lung cancer”), a concise email to the program coordinator or APD is reasonable.
• Avoid generic “I really like your program” emails; instead, ask concrete, thoughtful questions that are not already clearly answered on the website.

Any communications should be professional, brief, and well-written.

---

Step 7: Use Interviews and Second-Look Opportunities to Validate Your Research

Your pre-interview research is a starting point. During interviews, you’ll gain the most detailed insights into resident culture and day-to-day reality.

Prepare Targeted Questions

Tailor questions to each program based on what you learned:

For program leadership/faculty:

• “How do you see the department evolving over the next 5–10 years?”
• “What are you most proud of about your residents?”
• “How have you adapted resident education in response to recent feedback?”
• “How is research time structured, and how are mentors matched with residents?”

For residents:

• “What are the best and most challenging aspects of training here?”
• “How comfortable do you feel with autonomy in contouring, planning, and on-treatment management?”
• “How has the program supported you during personal or family challenges?”
• “If you were choosing again, would you rank this program first? Why or why not?”

Use their answers to confirm—or contradict—your pre-interview impressions.

Pay Attention to Small Details

During virtual or in-person visits, note:

• Do residents seem comfortable speaking candidly?
• Do faculty seem aware of and invested in resident education?
• Is there a sense of collegiality between radiation oncology and other services?

Your gut reaction matters, but anchor it to objective observations and what you’ve already learned.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. How many radiation oncology programs should I research and apply to?

Research broadly at first—review essentially all active radiation oncology residency programs at a high level so you understand the landscape. Then, based on your priorities and competitiveness (board scores, research, letters, etc.), most applicants end up applying to 20–40 programs. Very strong or very constrained applicants may apply to fewer or more, but a focused list grounded in careful research tends to yield better outcomes than a scattershot approach.

2. I don’t have a home rad onc department. How can I learn about programs and build mentors?

Use away rotations (in-person or virtual), national societies (ASTRO, ARRO), and research projects to connect with faculty. Many departments are open to collaborating with interested students on retrospective or clinical projects. You can also ask your school’s dean’s office, oncology, or radiology faculty for introductions. When you do connect with mentors, be explicit that you’re looking for guidance on evaluating residency programs and the rad onc match process.

3. How heavily should I weigh program prestige versus location or lifestyle?

Prestige can influence early career opportunities, particularly in highly competitive academic paths, but it is not the only factor. For many applicants, a program that offers strong training, supportive mentorship, and a sustainable lifestyle in a preferred location is a better overall choice than a slightly more “prestigious” program that misaligns with personal or family needs. When evaluating residency programs, consider where you are likely to thrive, not just survive.

4. What if a program looks weak in one area I care about (e.g., brachytherapy), but strong overall?

No program is perfect. Ask:

• Can you realistically supplement that gap through electives, away rotations, or fellowship?
• Is this deficiency a temporary issue (e.g., one faculty vacancy) or a structural feature?
• Are there other strengths (research, mentorship, case mix) that outweigh this weakness for your particular goals?

If the gap directly conflicts with your core career plans (e.g., you want to become a brachytherapy expert and the program offers virtually none), that program may not be ideal. Otherwise, a strong overall environment can sometimes compensate for one or two specific limitations.

---

By approaching your search with a clear program research strategy—defining your goals, gathering structured information, and validating your impressions through conversations and interviews—you’ll be well positioned to navigate the rad onc match and choose a radiation oncology residency that truly fits both your professional aspirations and your life outside the clinic.