Addressing Red Flags: A DO Graduate’s Guide to EM-IM Residency Success

Understanding Red Flags as a DO Applicant to EM-IM Combined Programs

For a DO graduate targeting an Emergency Medicine–Internal Medicine (EM IM combined) residency, the stakes feel especially high. These programs are small, competitive, and attract applicants who often appear “flawless” on paper. If you’re worried about red flags in your application—board scores, gaps, failures, professionalism issues—you’re not alone.

The good news: many DO graduates with imperfect applications successfully match into emergency medicine internal medicine programs every year. The difference is not just whether you have a red flag; it’s how you identify, explain, and strategically manage it.

This article focuses on:

• Common red flags for DO graduates applying to EM IM combined residencies
• How EM-IM program directors tend to view these issues
• Step-by-step strategies for addressing failures, explaining gaps, and reframing your narrative
• Practical examples you can adapt for your own application materials
• Frequently asked questions specific to DO applicants

---

Common Red Flags in EM-IM Applications for DO Graduates

Red flags in a residency application are signals that raise concerns about reliability, competence, professionalism, or fit. Program directors are not looking for “perfect” applicants—they’re looking for residents they can trust to care for complex patients in high-acuity environments.

1. Academic and Board-Related Red Flags

For a DO graduate aiming at EM-IM combined programs, academic issues often fall into one or more of these categories:

• COMLEX Level 1 or 2 failure or low scores
• USMLE Step 1 or 2 failure (if taken)
• Significant improvement needed between exams
• Course or clerkship failures, particularly in core rotations (IM, EM, surgery, pediatrics)
• Decelerated curriculum, extended time to graduate, or academic probation

How EM-IM programs may view these:

• Single failure vs pattern: A single board failure with a strong recovery is often survivable; repeated failures suggest underlying problems.
• Context matters: Life events (illness, family crisis), inadequate test-taking strategies, or transitioning to medical school rigor can mitigate concern—if explained clearly.
• EM-IM lens: Combined EM-IM training is fast-paced and cognitively intense. PDs want reassurance you can handle high-acuity decision-making and multi-year training without burning out or failing future exams (e.g., in-training exams, boards).

2. Professionalism and Conduct Concerns

These include:

• Formal professionalism warnings or remediation
• Lapses documented in the MSPE (Medical School Performance Evaluation)
• Issues with attendance, communication, or teamwork
• Boundary violations or unprofessional conduct with patients, staff, or peers

EM-IM perspective: Emergency medicine internal medicine residents work in stressful environments where teamwork and integrity are non-negotiable. Professionalism red flags are often more serious than a single failed exam because they predict future workplace problems.

3. Gaps in Training or Unexplained Time Off

Common scenarios:

• A leave of absence (LOA) during medical school
• A year off between graduation and application
• Incomplete prior residency training or switching specialties
• Personal or health-related interruptions

Why this matters: Program directors will ask, sometimes explicitly:

“If they had to step away once, what’s the risk it happens again in our intense combined program?”

They’re not necessarily unwilling to accept applicants with gaps; they just want confidence in your stability, insight, and preparedness. How to explain gaps clearly and professionally becomes crucial.

4. Limited or Weak EM or IM Exposure (Especially for DO Applicants)

For DO graduates, a lack of:

• Home EM or IM rotations at academic centers
• Strong EM or IM letters of recommendation
• Exposure to combined EM-IM environments

…can raise subtle red flags about your commitment or understanding of this career path, especially when pursuing an osteopathic residency match that includes highly competitive EM-IM programs.

5. Program Fit and Communication Red Flags

Even without obvious academic or professionalism issues, applications can signal risk when:

• The personal statement is generic or unclear about why EM-IM combined training
• Your experiences don’t align with a realistic understanding of EM and IM
• Letters of recommendation are lukewarm or vague
• ERAS application has inconsistencies or unexplained details

These may not be “catastrophic” red flags, but in a competitive osteopathic residency match, they can easily push you out of consideration.

---

Step-by-Step Framework for Addressing Red Flags

Step 1: Identify Your Red Flags Honestly

Before you can manage your narrative, you must see your application the way an EM-IM program director will.

Do a structured self-audit:

1. Academic record:

   • Any exam failures?
   • Any courses/clerkships repeated or remediated?
   • Any LOA or repeated years?

2. Board performance:

   • COMLEX scores: Are they below typical EM benchmarks?
   • USMLE scores (if applicable): Any failures or low performance?
   • Trend: Did you improve over time?

3. MSPE and dean’s letter:

   • Any language about professionalism issues or concerns?
   • Any “areas for improvement” that keep repeating?

4. Timeline:

   • Is there any unexplained gap >2–3 months?
   • Did you graduate on time?

5. EM and IM preparation:

   • EM rotations (including EM sub-I) completed?
   • IM sub-I or strong inpatient IM exposure?
   • Letters from EM and IM faculty who know you well?

Writing these down clarifies what needs to be addressed proactively.

Step 2: Clarify the Underlying Story

For each red flag, outline:

• What exactly happened
• Why it happened (context, not excuses)
• What concrete steps you took to address it
• How you’ve demonstrated improvement since

Example for a COMLEX failure:

• What: Failed COMLEX Level 1 on first attempt, passed on retake.
• Why: Poor test strategy, underestimating question style; simultaneous family stress.
• Response:
  • Met with academic support and faculty advisors
  • Completed structured test-prep program
  • Developed an 8-week content review and question bank plan
  • Utilized simulation exams to target weak domains
• Outcome:
  • Passed Level 1 on second attempt with score improvement
  • Passed Level 2 on first attempt with significantly higher performance
  • Strong clerkship grades in IM and EM after remediation

Program directors care less about the event itself and more about the trajectory and insight after the event.

Step 3: Decide Where Each Red Flag Should Be Addressed

There is a balance between overemphasizing a problem and appearing evasive. In general:

• Personal Statement (PS):
  Best for major, central red flags (e.g., repeated year, major COMLEX/USMLE failure, personal health or life event that shaped your path).
• ERAS “Other Impactful Experiences” or “Education” sections:
  Where you document leaves of absence, delays, decelerated curricula, or transitions between programs.
• Dean’s letter/MSPE:
  Often already describes academic or professionalism issues. Your task is to provide context and growth in your own voice.
• Interviews:
  Where you clarify, humanize, and show maturity regarding red flags, especially when asked directly.

For smaller issues (one shelf exam score, a single weak rotation), you may not need a full explanation unless they clearly stand out in your record.

Step 4: Use Clear, Direct, Non-Defensive Language

When addressing failures or explaining gaps, the tone should be:

• Honest, not evasive
• Owning responsibility, not blaming
• Focused on growth, not self-pity

Avoid phrases like “I failed because the exam was unfair” or “The faculty didn’t support me.” Instead, use balanced language.

Example: addressing failures in a personal statement (COMLEX failure)

During my second year, I failed COMLEX Level 1 on my first attempt. I entered the exam underprepared and without an effective strategy for board-style questions. This was a difficult turning point that forced me to reassess my study habits and resilience. I met with my academic dean, sought help from our learning center, and built a structured plan emphasizing question-based learning and spaced repetition. On my second attempt, I passed with a significant score increase, and I subsequently passed COMLEX Level 2 on the first attempt. This experience taught me to confront weaknesses early, seek help proactively, and build systems to sustain improvement—skills I now bring to my work in emergency medicine and internal medicine rotations.

Notice the elements:

• Admits the failure
• Provides a clear cause
• Describes specific corrective actions
• Shows a positive trajectory and connection to clinical performance

Step 5: Demonstrate Sustained Improvement, Not Just Intention

Program directors want evidence that your red flag is in the past. For DO graduates in the osteopathic residency match, this is crucial when competing with applicants who have smooth trajectories.

You can demonstrate this with:

• Stronger subsequent board scores (e.g., better Level 2 vs Level 1)
• Honors/high passes in EM and IM rotations
• Strong letters of recommendation noting reliability and growth
• Longitudinal involvement (e.g., EM interest group, research, quality improvement projects)
• Consistent work or clinical activity during gaps

If you had a professionalism concern, a powerful sign of improvement is a letter from a faculty member or clerkship director stating that you are now exemplary in communication, teamwork, or reliability.

---

Specific Red Flag Scenarios and How to Handle Them

1. COMLEX/USMLE Failures as a DO EM-IM Applicant

Many DO applicants worry that exam failures are automatic disqualifiers for EM-IM combined programs. They are not automatic—especially if:

• You have only one failure (not repeated across multiple exams)
• You show a strong upward trend
• You excel clinically in EM and IM settings

What to do:

• Be transparent in your personal statement or ERAS.
  One short, focused paragraph is usually sufficient.
• Emphasize growth and later performance.
  Reference Level 2 or shelf scores that reflect improvement.
• Highlight clinical strengths.
  Program directors in emergency medicine internal medicine care about how you think, communicate, and perform on rotations.

Example phrasing for ERAS “Additional Information” section:

I failed COMLEX Level 1 on my initial attempt. In response, I met with academic advisors, completed a structured remediation plan, and significantly changed my study approach. I passed COMLEX Level 1 on my second attempt and subsequently passed COMLEX Level 2 on my first attempt with a higher score. My clinical evaluations, especially in internal medicine and emergency medicine, reflect the consistency and work ethic I developed through this process.

2. How to Explain Gaps or Leaves of Absence

Program directors want to see stability and readiness. How to explain gaps without raising more concern:

If the gap was for personal health:

• You do not need to disclose specific diagnoses.
• Focus on resolution and ability to function fully now.

Example language:

During my third year, I took a medical leave of absence lasting four months to address a health issue. I received appropriate treatment and have fully recovered. Since returning, I have completed all subsequent rotations on schedule, with strong performance in EM and IM. I am medically cleared without restrictions and fully prepared for the demands of residency training.

If the gap was for family reasons:

I took a leave of absence between my second and third years to assist a close family member during a serious illness. This period, while challenging, reinforced my commitment to medicine and empathy for patients and families. I returned to school with renewed focus and have since completed my training without delay, performing strongly on my clinical rotations.

If the gap involved career uncertainty or switching interests:

This is more delicate. Program directors worry about future indecision. Show:

• Clear reflection
• Convincing rationale for EM-IM
• Evidence that you’ve tested this path through clinical rotations and experiences

3. Addressing Professionalism Concerns

If your MSPE or dean’s letter references professionalism issues, expect interviewers to ask. Prepare a 1–2 minute, structured response:

1. Acknowledge the issue briefly and factually
2. Take responsibility without self-attack
3. Describe what you learned and changed
4. Give 1–2 specific examples of improved behavior since

Example (chronic lateness on early clerkships):

Early in my clinical years, I received feedback regarding punctuality and time management. I underestimated pre-rounding time and occasionally arrived later than expected, which was documented in my evaluation. I took this seriously and worked with my advisor to create structured routines for preparation and commute planning. Since then, my evaluations have consistently noted reliability and punctuality, and I have not had further issues. The experience underscored for me that attention to details like timeliness directly impacts team function and patient care.

4. Limited EM Exposure for an EM-IM Application

For some DO schools with limited home EM or combined EM-IM options, this can appear as a subtle red flag about commitment.

To fix this:

• Complete at least one EM sub-internship at an academic center, ideally where EM-IM faculty are present.
• Secure strong EM letters of recommendation, explicitly commenting on your readiness for combined training.
• Seek IM rotations that showcase your interest in chronic disease management, critical care, and longitudinal care.
• Use your personal statement to clearly articulate why EM-IM combined, not just EM or IM alone.

Example angle for personal statement:

My experiences in both high-acuity emergency care and longitudinal internal medicine clinics led me toward combined EM-IM training. In the ED, I value rapid stabilization and acute decision-making; on the wards and in continuity clinics, I appreciate the depth of diagnostic workup, chronic disease management, and building long-term relationships. EM-IM training aligns with my goal to practice across settings—caring for patients at their sickest while also managing their long-term health.

---

Tailoring Your Application Strategy as a DO for EM-IM

1. Apply Broadly and Strategically

EM-IM programs are few and extremely competitive. For a DO graduate with red flags, it’s wise to:

• Apply to both EM-IM and categorical EM and/or categorical IM programs
• Include a mix of:
  • University-based academic programs
  • Community-based EM and IM programs open to DOs
  • Programs with a history of supporting DO graduates

Your goal is to create multiple pathways to a good fit—not place all your hopes on a handful of EM-IM combined spots.

2. Strong Letters of Recommendation Are Your Best Counterweight

For red flags, letters matter even more. Aim for:

• At least one EM letter and one IM letter from faculty who supervised you closely
• Letters that explicitly describe:
  • Work ethic
  • Clinical reasoning
  • Reliability and professionalism
  • Growth after any prior difficulties

If you have a prior professionalism issue, a strong letter speaking to your current behavior can be extremely persuasive in reassuring program directors.

3. Use Your DO Background as an Asset

As a DO graduate in the osteopathic residency match, highlight:

• Training in holistic, patient-centered care
• OMM/OMT exposure and how it shapes your approach (even if you don’t plan to use it extensively in EM-IM)
• Experience in community or underserved settings during clinical rotations

This can be particularly appealing in EM-IM, where you’ll see both acute and longitudinal aspects of care and where whole-person thinking is valuable.

4. Prepare for Interview Questions on Red Flags

Expect variants of:

• “Tell me about any challenges or setbacks in medical school.”
• “I see you had to repeat [exam/rotation]. Could you walk me through what happened?”
• “What did you learn from [gap/professionalism issue], and how have you changed since?”

Use the STAR framework (Situation, Task, Action, Result):

1. Situation: Brief context
2. Task: What you needed to do or what was at stake
3. Action: Concrete steps you took
4. Result: Improvement and what you learned

Practice out loud with a mentor, advisor, or career office. Your goal is to sound honest, reflective, and confident—not rehearsed or defensive.

---

Putting It All Together: A Sample Narrative for a DO EM-IM Applicant with Red Flags

Here’s how these elements might come together for a DO graduate with:

• A failed COMLEX Level 1
• A brief leave of absence for family reasons
• Strong EM and IM clinical performance

Application Narrative Strategy:

• ERAS Education section: Document LOA dates with a short “Family health-related leave; returned in [month/year] and completed curriculum on schedule.”
• Personal statement:
  • 1 paragraph acknowledging the COMLEX failure, remediation, and improvement
  • 1 brief mention of the family-related leave, what it taught about empathy and resilience
  • Majority of the statement focused on EM-IM motivation, clinical experiences, and future goals
• Letters of recommendation:
  • EM faculty letter highlighting rapid adaptation, teamwork, and acute care skills
  • IM faculty letter highlighting depth of reasoning and reliability over the clerkship
• Interviews:
  • Practiced 60–90 second explanation of failure and LOA using STAR framework
  • Ready examples showing current consistency and readiness for intense combined training

The outcome: While some hyper-selective EM-IM programs may still pass, many programs will view this application as transparent, accountable, and maturing—far better than an application that tries to hide or minimize red flags.

---

FAQs: Red Flags and EM-IM Residency for DO Graduates

1. Are DO graduates with exam failures automatically screened out of EM-IM combined programs?

Not automatically, but your margin is tighter. Programs vary widely. Some may have strict cutoffs; others look more holistically, especially if:

• You show a clear upward trend (e.g., stronger Level 2 scores)
• You have strong EM and IM clinical evaluations
• Your letters of recommendation support your readiness

Apply broadly, including categorical EM and IM programs, and be proactive in addressing failures and demonstrating growth.

2. How many EM-IM programs should I apply to if I have red flags?

Since EM-IM combined programs are limited in number, most applicants—even without red flags—don’t rely solely on them. As a DO with red flags, consider:

• Applying to all EM-IM programs that accept DOs and align with your goals
• Adding a robust list of categorical EM and/or IM programs (often 30–60+ total EM/IM programs, depending on your competitiveness)
• Discussing your list with an advisor who knows your school’s match data for DO graduates

3. How do I decide whether to explain a red flag in my personal statement vs just in ERAS?

Use this rule of thumb:

• PS: For major, high-impact issues that shaped your path (failed board with large subsequent improvement, extended LOA, repeated year, substantial personal hardship that influenced your goals).
• ERAS-only or interview: For smaller, self-limited issues (short gap, single low shelf score, mild concern that’s already explained in MSPE).

If you do use your PS, limit red-flag discussion to 1–2 concise paragraphs; keep the majority of the essay focused on your passion for EM-IM, clinical strengths, and career vision.

4. I’m a DO without a home EM-IM program. How can I show genuine interest in emergency medicine internal medicine?

You can demonstrate commitment without a home combined program by:

• Doing EM and IM sub-internships at institutions that have EM-IM programs
• Seeking out mentors who are dual-trained or work closely with EM-IM residents
• Participating in EM and IM interest groups, research, or quality improvement projects
• Explicitly articulating in your personal statement how your experiences in both specialties led you to seek combined training

Showing that you understand the unique demands and advantages of EM-IM—and that you’ve thought carefully about this choice—will help reassure program directors that you’re pursuing the right fit, not just “another competitive track.”

---

Red flags do not define your career. For a DO graduate pursuing EM-IM combined training, your task is to transform those red flags into evidence of resilience, self-awareness, and growth. When you address them head-on—with honesty, strategy, and strong clinical performance—you give program directors what they want most: confidence that you’ll be a safe, reliable, and thriving resident in one of medicine’s most demanding and rewarding training paths.