Recognizing Resident Turnover Warning Signs in EM Residency for DO Graduates

For a DO graduate entering emergency medicine, understanding resident turnover warning signs can be the difference between thriving in training and spending three tough years in the wrong environment. Turnover happens in every residency, but when patterns of residents leaving a program emerge, they can signal deeper program problems that directly affect your education, wellness, and career trajectory.

This guide walks you through how to recognize red flags related to resident turnover in emergency medicine residency programs, with a specific lens for osteopathic applicants navigating the EM match and osteopathic residency match environment.

---

Why Resident Turnover Matters—Especially for DO Graduates in EM

Resident turnover is not just a statistic; it’s a reflection of a program’s health. When multiple residents leave a program—or talk about wanting to—this often reveals issues such as:

• Poor leadership or communication
• Unsafe clinical workload
• Toxic culture or bullying
• Lack of educational structure
• Inadequate support for struggling residents
• Burnout and mental health neglect

For a DO graduate entering emergency medicine residency, these issues can be amplified by:

• Variable comfort with osteopathic training in previously ACGME-only institutions
• Potential bias (implicit or explicit) about DO graduates
• Less structured osteopathic mentorship in some programs
• Pressure to prove yourself in high-volume, high-acuity EDs

Because EM residency is intense by nature—night shifts, high patient volume, critical decision-making—program instability and high resident turnover can significantly increase your risk of burnout and undermine your learning.

Key mindset: A single resident leaving a program is not necessarily a red flag. Repeated, unexplained, or poorly addressed turnover is.

---

Understanding Normal vs Concerning Resident Turnover

Before labeling any turnover as a red flag, you need context. Not all departures mean a program is in trouble.

What “Normal” Turnover Can Look Like

These situations are often benign and sometimes even positive:

• Family or geographic needs: A PGY-1 who transfers closer to a spouse, sick family member, or support system.
• Genuine specialty change: A resident who realizes they’re better suited for anesthesia or internal medicine and switches.
• Military or personal obligations: Sudden deployment or personal health reasons.
• Program restructuring with transparency: A program that intentionally reduces class size with clear, documented communication to residents and applicants.

In these cases, leadership usually:

• Explains the situation clearly to the rest of the residents
• Adjusts schedules thoughtfully to prevent burnout
• Documents reasons in a way that seems consistent and believable

When Turnover Becomes a Warning Sign

Turnover becomes a resident turnover red flag when you see patterns like:

• Multiple residents leaving the same class or year
• Residents “disappearing” with no honest explanation
• Rumors of people trying to leave but “stuck” because of contracts or intimidation
• Class sizes shrinking year after year with vague or shifting explanations
• Current residents consistently warning you about workload, culture, or leadership

Emergency medicine is particularly vulnerable to burnout because of staffing shortages and high volume. When multiple residents are leaving or trying to leave, that’s often your first indicator of underlying program problems.

---

Concrete Turnover Red Flags to Watch For on the Interview Trail

You will not see a slide that says “Residents leaving program” during interviews. You have to read the environment, ask tactful questions, and compare what different people tell you. Below are specific signs to look for as a DO graduate applying in the EM match.

1. Inconsistent Stories About Why Residents Left

When faculty, the program director (PD), and residents give very different explanations about turnover, that’s a major concern.

What to watch for:

• PD says: “We haven’t had anyone leave in years.”
  Residents quietly say: “We had a PGY-2 leave last year and a PGY-3 the year before.”
• Faculty dismiss turnover as “personal issues” but residents hint at workload, mistreatment, or safety concerns.
• Stories keep changing—first it’s “academic issues,” later it’s “family issues,” then “career change.”

Questions you can ask (tactfully):

• “How often have residents transferred out of the program in the last 5–10 years?”
• “If someone is struggling or thinking about leaving, how is that handled here?”
• “Have there been residents who decided emergency medicine wasn’t for them? How did the program support that transition?”

You’re not fishing for gossip; you’re testing for transparency and consistency.

---

2. Noticeable Gaps in Resident Classes or Reduced Class Size Without Clear Reason

While occasional variations in class size can be normal, unexplained shrinking class sizes can indicate underlying problems.

Possible warning patterns:

• A previously stable program of 14 residents per year now only has 8 or 9, with vague explanation like “we just wanted to be smaller” but no mention of accreditation changes or funding.
• Upper-level resident classes are clearly short by 1–3 residents, and nobody gives a straightforward, specific reason.
• Residents hint at people leaving but appear nervous giving details.

You can ask:

• “I noticed the PGY-2 class seems smaller—was that intentional or did people transfer?”
• “How many residents per class do you anticipate long-term?”
• “Have there been any major changes in funding, ED volume, or hospital administration that affected class size?”

If they brush these off without substance, especially combined with other concerns, that’s a resident turnover red flag.

---

3. Residents Seem Afraid to Speak Honestly—Especially When Faculty Are Nearby

One of the most reliable indicators of a healthy program is whether residents can speak openly—about pros and cons—without fear.

Concerning signs:

• Residents only say glowing things, but in a way that feels rehearsed or robotic.
• They glance at faculty or chief residents before answering questions.
• Any time you ask about challenges, they say, “Everything’s great” and quickly change the subject.
• Separate conversation with a single resident yields a very different, more negative story.

For a DO graduate, this may also show up as:

• Residents hesitating when you directly ask how DOs are treated.
• Comments like “Well…they say they’re DO-friendly…” followed by silence or a subject change.

Questions to ask during resident-only time:

• “What’s one thing you wish you could change about this program?”
• “What kind of residents end up struggling here? How does the program respond?”
• “What’s one thing you’re jealous of that your friends at other EM programs have?”

In healthy programs, residents can comfortably share both positives and real challenges.

---

4. Very High Workload With Little Acknowledgement or Support

High volume and intensity are intrinsic to emergency medicine. The issue isn’t being busy; it’s being unsafe, unsupported, or ignored when that busyness becomes unsustainable.

Turnover-related workload red flags:

• Residents describe chronic 60–80+ hour weeks, not just during ICU or trauma rotations.
• Frequent comments like “We’re basically the safety net for all staffing issues.”
• The program advertises “We work hard and play hard” but residents mostly look exhausted.
• High number of off-service rotations that feel like service work instead of education, with no sign of advocacy by EM leadership.
• Residents talk about people leaving or wanting to leave because they “couldn’t take it anymore.”

For DO graduates specifically:

• DO residents quietly say they feel like they have to “pick up the slack” or prove themselves more.
• No acknowledgment or support if you come from an osteopathic school with less exposure to high-volume EDs; instead you’re expected to “just figure it out.”

Questions you can ask:

• “How often do shifts run over?”
• “What does backup look like when the ED is overwhelmed?”
• “Have residents ever raised concerns about workload? How did leadership respond?”

If residents have raised legitimate concerns and nothing changed, that is a direct link to burnout and the risk of residents leaving program.

---

How DO Graduates Can Investigate Turnover Quietly and Effectively

You will rarely get a clear sentence like, “We’ve lost six residents in three years.” You have to be strategic in collecting information, especially as a DO graduate considering both former osteopathic programs and historically allopathic ones.

1. Use EMRA, Alumni, and Medical School Connections

• Ask EM advisors at your DO school: “Have any of our graduates matched there? How did they like it?”
• Reach out (politely) on LinkedIn or via mutual connections to DO graduates at the program or recent alumni.
• Attend EMRA or ACEP events; ask residents about programs you’re interested in and whether they’ve heard of residents leaving.

Discreet questions for alumni:

• “How stable was your program while you were there?”
• “Were there any residents who left the program, and if so, why?”
• “Would you choose the same program again if you had to redo the EM match?”

If you hear multiple stories of residents leaving or trying to escape the program, treat that as strong evidence.

---

2. Read Between the Lines During Interview Day

You’re not just listening to what people say—you’re observing how they say it and how they behave.

Subtle clues of program problems:

• Multiple references to “a tough year” without specifics.
• Leadership emphasizes “resilience” and “grit” excessively instead of balance and support.
• You see visible tension between residents and faculty at conferences or tours.
• Faculty frequently joke about residents being “soft” or “complainers.”
• Chiefs appear exhausted, defensive, or overly polished in their talking points.

For DO graduates, also note:

• Whether DO residents are showcased or hidden.
• If you’re the only DO interviewee at multiple interview days, ask yourself why.
• Any subtle comments about “board scores” or “caliber” that feel dismissive of DO pathways.

---

3. Ask About Wellness and Response to Crisis

Sometimes a program’s culture is revealed by how they handle tough situations—resident illness, a patient death, or a serious mistake.

Questions that reveal deeper culture:

• “Can you share an example of when a resident went through a hard time? How did the program respond?”
• “How are schedule changes or coverage handled if someone has a family or mental health crisis?”
• “Have there been any major changes due to resident feedback in the last few years?”

Listen for:

• Concrete examples of positive change (e.g., “We added an extra day off after night shifts because residents were burning out”).
• Genuine empathy versus blame (“We try to understand what’s happening and support them” vs “They just couldn’t hack it”).

A program that regularly blames former residents who left (“not strong enough,” “not cut out for EM”) is waving a major red flag.

---

Balancing Resident Turnover With Your Own Priorities and Risk Tolerance

No EM residency is perfect. Your goal isn’t to find a program with zero residents leaving (which may not even be realistic), but rather to assess why people leave and whether those reasons are acceptable to you.

Step 1: Clarify What You Need as a DO Graduate in EM

Consider:

• Support for board preparation: Do you need structured help with the EM in-training exam, COMLEX Level 3, or USMLE Step exams if you’ve taken them?
• Mentorship for osteopathic graduates: Is there at least one DO faculty member or someone explicitly supportive of DO pathways?
• Volume vs safety: Do you want a high-volume trauma center at any cost, or is a balanced community-academic mix better for you?
• Geographic support system: Would being near family or friends buffer some program stress? That can matter if the program’s culture is less than ideal.

---

Step 2: Weigh Turnover Against Other Strengths

Sometimes a program with moderate turnover offers:

• Outstanding procedural experience and autonomy
• Strong didactics and protected conference time
• A supportive PD actively trying to fix legacy problems
• Great fellowship or job placement

In contrast, a program with zero visible turnover might be:

• Very low volume or low acuity
• Rigid, with no room for residents to leave—even when they are truly miserable
• Hiding problems behind intense image control

Look for trends over time: Is the program improving, stagnating, or clearly deteriorating?

---

Step 3: When Turnover Should Move a Program Down (or Off) Your Rank List

Consider lowering a program on your list—or removing it—if you see several of these together:

• Multiple residents leaving in recent years with inconsistent or evasive explanations
• Shrinking class sizes without clear reasons
• Repeated stories of burnout, unsustainable workload, or unsafe patient care
• Residents clearly afraid to discuss negatives
• DO graduates (or other minority groups) describing feeling unsupported or singled out
• You personally leave the interview day feeling uneasy, overwhelmed, or “sold to” rather than authentically informed

For a DO graduate in the emergency medicine residency match, you may already feel pressure to rank any program that offers you an interview. Still, intentionally ranking a high-turnover, toxic program high can be more damaging to your career and mental health than taking a gap year, doing a preliminary year elsewhere, or re-entering the match with a stronger strategy.

---

Practical Examples: Applying These Concepts to Realistic Scenarios

Scenario 1: High Volume, High Concern

You’re a DO graduate with solid EM rotations and SLOEs. You interview at a large urban EM residency.

You notice:

• PD proudly mentions “Our residents are the workhorses of this hospital.”
• The PGY-2 class has only 7 residents; the website shows 10 matched 2 years prior.
• When you quietly ask a PGY-3 about it during the tour, they say, “People left for personal reasons,” but look uncomfortable and give no details.
• Residents frequently joke about “just surviving” and “getting through it” instead of learning.
• DO residents are present, but one comments, “You have to be tough here—there’s not much hand-holding.”

Interpretation: Possibly strong clinical training but multiple unconfronted wellness and culture issues contributing to residents leaving. If turnover is high and unexplained, and you’re not looking for a “sink or swim” environment, this is probably a real red flag.

---

Scenario 2: Small Class, Honest Leadership

You interview at a smaller community-academic hybrid program with a mix of MD and DO faculty.

You notice:

• The PGY-3 class has 5 residents; the website says 6 matched.
• PD openly explains: “One of our PGY-1s realized EM wasn’t right for them, and we helped them transition to psychiatry closer to family. We redistributed some shifts, but we also hired a nocturnist and added moonlighting to avoid burnout.”
• Residents confirm the story, adding details that match.
• Residents speak openly about pros and cons, including that off-service rotations can be busy, but say they feel heard and supported.

Interpretation: Turnover present but well-managed, transparent, and not a sign of systemic dysfunction. This is far less of a resident turnover red flag.

---

Final Thoughts: Trust Both Data and Your Instincts

As a DO graduate entering emergency medicine, you are navigating a complex EM match landscape with varying levels of experience training osteopathic residents. Resident turnover is one of the most important—and under-discussed—signals of program health.

Use a combination of:

• Direct questions
• Observation of resident behavior and morale
• Alumni and advisor input
• Your own gut reaction to the culture

If multiple pieces point toward residents leaving program for preventable reasons—burnout, mistreatment, unsafe workload, or lack of support—take that seriously. You are not just choosing where you’ll work for three or four years; you’re choosing the environment that will shape your identity and confidence as an emergency physician.

---

FAQ: Resident Turnover Warning Signs for DO Graduates in EM

1. Is it always a bad sign if a resident leaves a program?
No. One or two residents leaving over several years can be normal, especially for personal or geographic reasons, or a genuine specialty change. It becomes concerning when there is a pattern of multiple residents leaving, changing stories about why, or clear signs of burnout and dissatisfaction linked to those departures.

---

2. As a DO graduate, should I avoid programs that have never trained DOs before?
Not automatically. Some historically allopathic programs are open, supportive, and excited to train DO graduates. However, you should ask explicitly:

• “Have you had DO residents before? How have they done?”
• “Do you support OMT use if clinically appropriate?”
• “Who can I talk to about board prep for COMLEX Level 3 or dual-boarded expectations?”

If their answers are vague, dismissive, or minimized—and you also see signs of high resident turnover—that combination should lower your confidence in the program.

---

3. How can I ask about residents leaving program without sounding negative or confrontational?
Use neutral, curiosity-based language:

• “I noticed some variability in class size—was that intentional or related to transfers?”
• “Every program has people who struggle sometimes. How has that played out here in recent years?”
• “Have you had residents transition out of EM? What did that process look like?”

You’re not accusing; you’re gathering information. Programs that react defensively or shut down these questions raise concern.

---

4. What if my top-choice emergency medicine residency has some red flags around turnover?
No program is perfect. Ask yourself:

• Are the issues historical with evidence of genuine improvement, or ongoing?
• Are PD and leadership honest about problems and actively addressing them?
• Do residents seem mostly proud of their training despite the challenges?

If you see multiple active red flags—high unexplained turnover, exhausted residents, fear of speaking honestly, and dismissive leadership—consider moving that program down your rank list, even if its name or location is attractive. Your long-term wellness, learning, and ability to become the emergency physician you want to be are more important than prestige or convenience.