Identifying Resident Turnover Red Flags for DO Graduates in Med-Peds

Understanding Resident Turnover: Why It Matters for DO Med-Peds Applicants

When you’re a DO graduate applying to Medicine-Pediatrics (Med-Peds), you already know you’re joining one of the most versatile and demanding specialties. You’ll be training in two departments, often across multiple sites, and you’re committing four years of your life to one institution. That’s why resident turnover isn’t just a minor detail—it’s one of the most important barometers of program health.

“Resident turnover” includes:

• Residents transferring to other programs
• Residents leaving medicine entirely
• Multiple residents going on extended leave and not returning
• Large numbers of residents graduating but being replaced by fewer or more new residents than expected
• Unusually frequent changes to the resident roster year-to-year

A single resident leaving a program is not automatically concerning. People have family issues, medical needs, or geographic constraints. But patterns of residents leaving a program can indicate deeper problems: toxic culture, unstable leadership, unsafe workloads, or lack of support—issues that can be especially harmful in a dual-training environment like Med-Peds.

For DO graduates, there’s an added layer: you may be more attuned to whether a program is inclusive of osteopathic training and philosophy. You want to be sure you’re not stepping into a culture where DOs feel less supported, or where resident turnover is disproportionately affecting DO graduates or Med-Peds residents compared with categorical internal medicine or pediatrics.

This article breaks down:

• What “normal” versus concerning resident turnover looks like
• Specific warning signs during your Med-Peds application process
• Targeted questions DO graduates should ask
• How to interpret mixed signals and make a safe, informed rank list

---

Normal vs. Concerning Turnover in Med-Peds Programs

Not all departures are red flags. Understanding the difference between healthy and unhealthy turnover is the foundation for spotting trouble.

What Normal Turnover Can Look Like

A well-functioning Med-Peds residency may still have:

• An occasional resident transferring (e.g., partner’s job move, family illness, geographic preferences)
• A resident stepping out for research or a chief year elsewhere
• A single class with one vacancy due to a mid-year transfer or leave

Key features of “normal” turnover:

• Program leadership can give a clear, consistent, and specific explanation
• Remaining residents are still positive overall about the program
• Morale does not seem globally affected
• There is no pattern of residents leaving year after year

Example:
A PGY-2 Med-Peds resident transfers closer to home after a parent gets sick. The PD is transparent; co-residents are sympathetic but not alarmed. No one suggests systemic issues, and other residents report feeling supported and valued.

When Resident Turnover Becomes a Red Flag

Resident turnover red flag patterns often look like:

• Multiple residents leaving in a short period

  • Two or more residents leaving within 1–2 years, especially from different classes
  • More than one Med-Peds resident transferring out (not just categorical IM or peds)

• Silence, vagueness, or inconsistent stories

  • Leadership uses vague phrases: “It was just a poor fit” for multiple residents
  • Residents give noticeably different explanations for why people left
  • No one seems willing to talk about it in detail

• Turnover that affects entire classes or specific groups

  • One class “shrinking” from 4 to 2 residents
  • DO residents or Med-Peds residents disproportionately leaving compared with MD or categorical residents

• Chronic under-filling or over-recruiting

  • Program consistently doesn’t fill all Med-Peds spots in the match
  • Frequent use of off-cycle or supplemental positions without clear reasons

If during interviews, people lower their voices, glance at each other before answering, or quickly change the subject when you ask about residents leaving the program, treat that as a cue to probe more deeply.

---

Specific Turnover Warning Signs in Medicine-Pediatrics Programs

Med-Peds is uniquely vulnerable to certain program problems because of its structure: two departments, multiple sites, four years of training, and often complex scheduling. Resident turnover can be both a symptom and a cause of deeper issues.

1. Discrepancies Between Medicine and Pediatrics Sides

In many Med-Peds residencies, you are functionally “owned” by two departments. Red flags emerge when resident turnover or morale is very different between them.

Warning signs:

• Residents leaving only from the Med-Peds track, not from categorical IM or peds
• Med-Peds residents reporting being “orphaned” between departments
• Markedly different cultures: medicine side is described as “rough” or “toxic” while pediatrics is “supportive,” or vice versa
• Comments like:
  • “We’re still working on getting medicine to understand what Med-Peds is.”
  • “We don’t have a Med-Peds presence in leadership on the medicine side.”

Why this matters:
If the Med-Peds program director doesn’t have strong, consistent influence in both departments, Med-Peds residents may be overloaded, mis-scheduled, or treated as “extra bodies” on either side. High turnover in Med-Peds—especially when categorical programs are stable—can indicate unresolved interdepartmental tensions.

2. Unstable or Frequently Changing Leadership

Turnover among program leadership is not automatically bad (e.g., someone promoted to a larger role). But recurrent or abrupt leadership changes can be a structural resident turnover red flag, especially for Med-Peds where strong advocates are essential.

Red flags:

• Multiple program directors in the last 3–5 years
• Frequent turnover of assistant PDs or chief residents
• Residents hint that “things are in transition” without a clear plan
• Leadership that seems unfamiliar with ACGME Med-Peds requirements or dual-board issues

Examples of concerning comments:

• “We’re waiting for the new PD to figure out the call schedule.”
• “We just lost our primary Med-Peds mentor, but we’re hoping to rebuild.”

For DO graduates, unstable leadership can also translate into inconsistent policies around osteopathic recognition, OMM use, or support for board exam preparation (COMLEX vs. USMLE).

3. Overwork, Burnout, and Unsafe Workloads

High resident attrition is often tied to burnout. This is amplified in Med-Peds, where call schedules, ICU rotations, and night float can be particularly complicated.

Indicators of workload-related program problems:

• Residents repeatedly describe the schedule as “brutal,” “unsustainable,” or “soul-crushing”
• High numbers of residents needing extended medical or mental health leaves
• Frequent mention of duty hour violations, especially if residents joke nervously about it
• Multiple residents leaving program for “health reasons” within a few years

Subtle hints:

• Residents say: “We survive it, but it’s not for everyone.”
• Med-Peds residents mention they are routinely used as “plug-ins” when either department has staffing gaps
• Cohorts talk about “just making it through” instead of professional growth or enthusiasm for training

4. Culture of Fear, Blame, or Shame

Resident turnover is more common in environments where residents feel unsafe speaking up.

Red flags include:

• Residents reluctant to answer questions about feedback, mistreatment, or wellness
• Stories of public shaming, hostile attending behavior, or punitive responses to errors
• No clear mechanism for confidential reporting—or residents don’t trust the process
• Residents mention that others “quietly left” after conflicts with leadership or faculty

You might hear:

• “We don’t really have issues as long as you keep your head down and do your work.”
• “It’s an old-school culture—you just power through.”

These are often code for a punitive or unsupportive environment.

5. Poor Support for DO Graduates and Non-Traditional Trainees

As a DO graduate, you should watch for how previous DOs have fared in the program. While this is not exactly the same as resident turnover, it is linked—programs that don’t support DO residents well may have higher DO attrition or lower satisfaction.

Potential red flags:

• No DO residents currently in the Med-Peds track (not always bad, but you should ask why)
• Past DO residents who transferred out or left altogether
• No clear understanding of COMLEX vs USMLE scores or how they support DO-specific needs
• Residents making comments like:
  • “We’re mostly MDs, but we’re open to DOs too.” (with no specifics)
  • “We had a DO, but they left to pursue something else.” (ask more)

If you spot a pattern of DO graduates or Med-Peds residents leaving program more often than others, dig deeper.

---

How to Spot Turnover Red Flags During the Application and Interview Process

You’ll usually not see “residents leaving program” listed on a website. You have to look for signals before, during, and after your interview day.

Before the Interview: Research and Pattern Recognition

1. Review the resident roster over time

   • Use archived versions of the program’s website (via the Internet Archive/Wayback Machine) to see how class sizes have changed.
   • Look for missing faces year-to-year:
     • Did a PGY-1 disappear in PGY-2?
     • Did a class shrink from 4 to 2?

2. Check for chronic underfilling

   • Investigate whether the program regularly fails to fill all Med-Peds slots in the osteopathic residency match or NRMP.
   • Recurrent unfilled positions can suggest reputation or internal problems.

3. Reach out to current or recent Med-Peds residents

   • Especially DO graduates and Med-Peds alumni.
   • Ask open-ended questions:
     • “How has resident retention been over the last few years?”
     • “Have there been any residents transferring out or leaving?”

During the Interview: Asking the Right Questions

The interview day is your best chance to evaluate turnover-related red flags in real time.

Questions for Program Leadership

Ask directly, but professionally:

• “In the last 3–5 years, have any residents left the Med-Peds program or transferred elsewhere? How did the program respond?”
• “Have there been any significant changes to the Med-Peds curriculum or schedule in response to resident feedback or attrition?”
• “How would you describe your resident retention in Med-Peds compared with your categorical IM and pediatrics programs?”
• “How have DO graduates historically done here in terms of support, board passage, and career outcomes?”

You are not accusing; you are evaluating.

What to look for:

• Clear, consistent stories
• Acknowledgment of past issues and concrete steps taken
• Data, not just vague reassurances

Concerning responses:

• “We don’t really track that.”
• “A few people have left, but that happens everywhere.” (with no further explanation)
• “We prefer not to get into that level of detail.”

Questions for Residents (Especially Med-Peds and DOs)

Residents are your best source of unfiltered insight.

Ask:

• “Have any residents left the program in recent years? What were the circumstances?”
• “If you could change one thing about this program, what would it be?”
• “Do you feel comfortable raising concerns without retaliation?”
• “How does the program respond when residents struggle—clinically, academically, or personally?”
• “How has the culture been for DO graduates in this program?”

Pay attention to:

• Facial expressions
• Hesitations before answering
• Glances between residents
• Whether they answer in generalities or specifics

Example of a reassuring answer:

“We had a PGY-2 who transferred to be closer to family. The program helped with letters and made the process really humane. Otherwise, most people stay and finish—our retention is very good.”

Example of a concerning answer:

“We’ve had a few people leave for various reasons… I’m not really sure of the details.” (followed by silence or subject change)

After the Interview: Triangulate Information

Compare:

• Leadership explanations vs. resident explanations
• Your impressions across multiple interview days
• How this program feels relative to others with similar case mix and reputation

If one program consistently has more vague answers about residents leaving program, more visible class shrinkage, and a more guarded resident tone, elevate that program on your watch list for potential problems.

---

Decision-Making for DO Med-Peds Applicants: Balancing Risk and Opportunity

By the time you’re ranking programs, you’ll have gathered impressions, stories, and your own intuition. The challenge is balancing clear red flags against other strengths (location, training quality, fellowship opportunities).

Step 1: Categorize Turnover Concerns

Sort each program into one of three categories:

1. Minimal Concern

   • One clearly explained resident departure in several years
   • No pattern of Med-Peds or DO residents leaving
   • Strong resident satisfaction and open culture

2. Moderate Concern

   • One or two unexplained or vaguely explained departures
   • Some visible tension between departments
   • Leadership in transition but with a clear plan

3. High Concern

   • Multiple residents leaving program over a short timeframe
   • Clear pattern of Med-Peds or DO attrition
   • Inconsistent or defensive explanations
   • Residents appear fearful or reluctant to talk

Step 2: Weigh Against Your Personal Priorities

You may be drawn to a program with incredible clinical exposure but moderate resident turnover concerns. Ask yourself:

• Am I willing to tolerate some uncertainty for a high-powered training environment?
• Do I have local support (family/friends) if the program culture is stressful?
• How much do I value stability vs. prestige vs. flexibility?

For DO graduates specifically:

• Does the program have a proven track record with DOs, Med-Peds, or both?
• How did DO graduates from that program fare in the medicine pediatrics match for fellowships or attending jobs?

Step 3: Have a Safety Plan

Even if you match into a program that later reveals hidden issues, you are not powerless. But it’s wise to plan ahead.

Actionable strategies:

• Keep a log (for yourself) of duty hours, major concerns, and communications with leadership.
• Learn early how transfers or remediation processes work, not because you plan to leave, but because knowledge reduces anxiety.
• Identify mentors (Med-Peds or DO faculty) outside your program if needed—for objective advice.

If you end up in a situation with genuine program problems and are considering leaving:

• Talk confidentially with trusted faculty, alumni, or GME office representatives.
• Recognize that residents leaving program is sometimes the rational choice when there is abuse, severe misalignment, or safety violations.
• Your worth as a physician is not defined by staying in a toxic environment.

---

Practical Example Scenarios: Applying the Red Flag Framework

To consolidate these concepts, here are two fictional but realistic Med-Peds scenarios.

Scenario 1: Subtle but Real Concerns

You interview at a mid-sized university program:

• Website shows last year’s Med-Peds PGY-2 class had 4 residents; now only 3 are listed.
• The PD says one resident “decided primary care wasn’t for them” and left medicine.
• A Med-Peds PGY-3 mentions quietly: “We’ve had a couple of people leave over the years. It’s not really my story to tell.”
• The schedule is described as “intense but manageable,” yet several residents seem visibly exhausted.

Analysis:

• There might be moderate concern. Some attrition, likely workload-related, with incomplete transparency.
• Not necessarily a deal-breaker, but you should compare with programs where residents are more openly positive and stable.

Scenario 2: High-Risk Red Flags

At another institution:

• The Med-Peds class sizes have shrunk over 3 years; at least two residents are “missing” from rosters.
• Categorical IM and pediatrics residents appear stable, but Med-Peds has lost at least three residents.
• Leadership vaguely says: “Those residents had personal issues” and quickly moves on.
• Med-Peds residents, when asked in a private breakout, appear uneasy:
  • “Things are better than they used to be, but it’s still rough.”
• A DO graduate quietly mentions: “I feel like I’ve had to prove myself a lot more than I expected.”

Analysis:

• Strong indication of structural program problems specifically affecting Med-Peds and potentially DOs.
• This would be a high-concern program; rank cautiously, if at all, unless you have compelling personal reasons and backup plans.

---

FAQs: Resident Turnover Warning Signs for DO Med-Peds Applicants

1. How much resident turnover is “too much” when evaluating a Med-Peds program?

There’s no universal number, but a concerning pattern is:

• More than one Med-Peds resident leaving in a 3–5 year span without clear, specific reasons
• Any class shrinking by 25–50% (e.g., 4 down to 2)
• Clearer pattern of Med-Peds or DO residents leaving while other tracks remain stable

One isolated, well-explained departure is usually acceptable. Patterns, vagueness, and defensive responses are what matter most.

2. Is it appropriate to ask directly why residents left a program?

Yes—if done respectfully. You can phrase it as:

• “I noticed some changes in your resident rosters over the past few years. Could you share how the program has responded when residents needed to leave or transfer?”

You are evaluating the program just as they’re evaluating you. Reasonable, professional questions about resident retention are appropriate and expected.

3. As a DO graduate, should I avoid programs that have never trained DOs in Med-Peds?

Not automatically. Some excellent programs simply haven’t had DO applicants or matched DOs yet. In that situation:

• Ask how they support DO board prep (COMLEX vs USMLE)
• Ask about institutional attitudes toward osteopathic training
• Look for openness, curiosity, and concrete support—rather than token reassurances

However, if a program has a history of DO residents who left, were marginalized, or consistently struggled, consider that a significant red flag.

4. What if I only notice major red flags after I start residency?

You’re not stuck. Steps to take:

• Document concerns factually and contemporaneously.
• Seek confidential mentorship from faculty you trust (inside or outside your program).
• Utilize your GME office, ombudsperson, or institutional well-being resources.
• If necessary, explore transfer options through appropriate channels.

Residents leaving program is sometimes the healthiest option in a truly unsafe or toxic environment, but always try to gather objective guidance before making irreversible decisions.

---

Resident turnover is not just a statistic—it’s a window into the lived reality of the residents you’re about to join. As a DO graduate applying to Med-Peds, use turnover patterns, resident stories, and your own instincts to identify programs where you can thrive for four demanding but transformative years. Your goal isn’t simply to match; it’s to match into a program that will support you as both a physician-in-training and a person.