Recognizing Resident Turnover Warning Signs in Emergency Medicine

Residency is hard everywhere—but not all difficulty is created equal. In emergency medicine, where burnout is already common, high resident turnover can signal deeper program problems that can affect your training, wellbeing, and career trajectory. Understanding what “normal” looks like versus what constitutes a resident turnover red flag is essential as you navigate the EM match.

This guide breaks down how to recognize warning signs, interpret them in context, and ask the right questions during interviews, second looks, and informal conversations.

---

Understanding Resident Turnover in Emergency Medicine

Before labeling something a red flag, it helps to understand what we mean by “resident turnover” and how it typically plays out in emergency medicine residency programs.

What Counts as Resident Turnover?

Resident turnover includes:

• Residents leaving the program entirely
  • Transferring to another EM program
  • Switching into a different specialty
  • Leaving medicine/training altogether
• Residents being dismissed, non‑renewed, or asked to repeat
  • Academic or professionalism dismissals
  • Contract non‑renewals
  • Repeating an entire year (especially multiple residents)
• Chronic unfilled positions
  • Categorical slots that are perennially vacant
  • Positions filled off-cycle because of prior departures

Not all turnover is inherently bad. Some movement is expected and can be perfectly benign.

What’s “Normal” vs. Concerning?

In EM, occasional resident movement is common:

• A single resident over several years transferring because of family relocation
• Someone realizing they truly want another specialty (e.g., anesthesia, critical care pathway, radiology)
• A rare academic dismissal or professionalism issue in an otherwise stable program

These events, while unfortunate, do not automatically mean the program is toxic.

Turnover becomes more concerning when patterns emerge:

• Multiple residents leaving the program every year
• Whole classes shrinking noticeably between PGY-1 and PGY-3/4
• Recurrent comments about “recent changes” or “growing pains” with no clear stabilization
• Faculty or leadership describing chronic difficulty retaining residents

In a field where team continuity and high-acuity training are crucial, persistent resident turnover can degrade both the learning environment and patient care.

---

Major Resident Turnover Red Flags in EM Programs

This section focuses on high-yield resident turnover warning signs you should actively look for during your emergency medicine residency search and EM match process.

1. Multiple Residents Leaving in Short Time Frames

One of the clearest red flags is clusters of residents leaving the program over a short period (1–3 years).

Signs to Watch For

• A PGY class that started with 12 residents now has 8–9
• Multiple PGY years with noticeable “missing” residents
• Chief residents vaguely referring to “restructuring” when you ask about class size
• Stories like:
  • “We had three people switch to other specialties last year”
  • “A couple people left after their intern year, but it was for personal reasons”

One or two isolated cases may be benign; multiple residents leaving program repeatedly across several years is more worrisome.

Why This Matters

High turnover often indicates:

• Toxic culture
  • Harassment, bullying, or unprofessional behavior tolerated
  • Poor psychological safety—residents feel unsafe to speak up
• Unmanageable workload or unsafe systems
  • Chronically understaffed shifts
  • Excessive scutwork with little education
• Mistrust in leadership
  • Residents feel leadership is unresponsive or punitive
  • Lack of transparency about scheduling, evaluations, or remediation

How to Ask About It

On interview day or a second look:

• “Have residents left the program in the last 3–5 years? If so, what were the typical reasons?”
• “Is this class size what the program typically matches, or have there been changes?”
• “Do you know of residents who transferred out during your training? What led to that?”

Listen for consistent, concrete explanations vs. vague, rehearsed, or defensive answers.

---

2. Leadership Dodging or Minimizing Turnover Questions

Turnover can happen even in healthy programs. What really matters is how leadership handles it.

A concerning resident turnover red flag is when program leadership:

• Avoids the question
  • Changes the subject when asked about residents leaving program
  • Answers vaguely: “Every program has residents come and go…”
• Blames the residents exclusively
  • “They just couldn’t handle the workload”
  • “They weren’t cut out for EM”
• Shows visible discomfort
  • Awkward glances between faculty or chiefs
  • Clearly rehearsed, overly polished talking points

In healthy programs, leadership can discuss turnover frankly, with nuance:

• “We did have two residents leave last year—one for family reasons to be closer to home, and another who realized they preferred internal medicine. We reviewed our mentorship structure afterward to support career decision-making earlier.”

What Good Transparency Looks Like

• Clear description of:
  • How many residents left
  • Why they left (in appropriately general terms)
  • What the program learned or changed (if anything)
• No shaming of past residents
• Alignment between what faculty, PD, and residents say

When leadership owns issues and describes steps for improvement, modest turnover is less worrisome. When they minimize or spin the narrative, treat it as a program problems warning sign.

---

3. Overworked Remaining Residents and Chronic Coverage Gaps

When multiple residents leave program and positions remain unfilled, the remaining residents can be stretched dangerously thin.

Warning Signs on Shifts and Rotations

• Residents casually mention:
  • “We’re always short-staffed”
  • “We’re constantly covering for people who left”
• Frequent extra shifts or unplanned schedule changes
• PGY-2s or PGY-3s covering roles that should be handled by more senior residents or attendings
• Substantial reliance on:
  • Moonlighters
  • Locums attendings
  • NP/PA coverage substituting for resident staffing

How It Shows Up During Your Visit

• You hear about:
  • Multiple unfilled positions from previous years
  • “We’re approved for 12 per class but currently have 8–9 per year”
• On ED tours:
  • Residents look visibly exhausted and rushed
  • You’re told: “We’re pretty slammed; this is how it always is”

The ED will naturally be busy, but burnout plus chronic coverage gaps is a dangerous combination.

Why This Matters for Your Training

• Less teaching time: attendings may focus on throughput over education
• Less protected learning: didactics may be interrupted for clinical coverage
• Risk of errors and burnout: overstretched systems increase safety concerns
• Culture may shift to resentment: toward leadership and sometimes toward new interns joining a strained system

Ask directly:

• “How often do residents have to pick up extra shifts to cover for vacancies or people leaving?”
• “Has the program had trouble filling spots or maintaining its approved class size?”

If the answer is “often” or “we’ve just gotten used to it,” that’s a significant red flag.

---

Program Culture, Morale, and Subtle Turnover Clues

Not all warning signs are overt. Some of the most important information comes from tone, morale, and the way residents talk about their program.

4. Low Morale and “Survival Mode” Culture

Emergency medicine is demanding, and some exhaustion is normal, especially in PGY-1. Still, it’s concerning when the overall emotional tone is:

• Cynical or resigned
• “Just get through this place” mindset
• Dark humor that consistently masks real distress

Listen for repeated phrases:

• “You’ll be fine if you just put your head down and get through it”
• “The best thing about this place is graduating”
• “We don’t really hang out together—everyone’s too burnt out”

A single frustrated resident isn’t a red flag by itself. But if many residents share similar negative sentiments, it can be a sign that people are counting the days until they can leave—or, in some cases, actively looking to transfer.

5. Disconnected or Silent Chiefs and Seniors

Chief residents and senior EM residents are usually proud of their program and involved in mentoring juniors. Concerning signs include:

• Chiefs who:
  • Appear burned out, disengaged, or indifferent
  • Give brief, non-specific answers about program strengths
  • Are absent or unavailable on interview days
• Seniors reluctant to talk about:
  • Leadership responsiveness
  • Recent graduates’ satisfaction
  • Changes in scheduling, workload, or policies

Often, programs in trouble try to shield applicants from discontent by limiting access to residents who might speak candidly. If you only meet hand-picked “ambassadors” and no one else, that’s worth noting.

6. Hidden or Downplayed Recent Changes

All programs evolve. But some “major changes” narratives are coded language for resident dissatisfaction or prior mismanagement.

Common examples:

• “We’ve had a lot of leadership changes in the last couple of years”
• “We’re in the middle of restructuring our schedule / sites / curriculum”
• “We’re reworking our wellness and support systems after some feedback”

These statements aren’t inherently bad. They may signal positive transformation. The red flag appears when:

• No one can clearly describe the specific plan or how residents were involved
• The program has had:
  • Multiple program directors in a short time frame
  • Rapid turnover among core faculty
• Residents’ stories conflict with the official narrative:
  • Leadership: “Everyone loves the new schedule”
  • Residents: “Honestly, the changes have been really rough, and people are not happy”

Repeated “we’re working on it” with no specifics is a warning sign, especially if tied to topics like mistreatment, uneven workload, or unsafe staffing.

---

How to Investigate Turnover During the EM Match Process

You cannot always see problems on paper. Learning to investigate resident turnover during the EM match requires strategy, observation, and good questions.

7. Use Data and Public Information Wisely

Start with what you can find before the interview:

• Program websites
  • Check resident rosters across multiple years (if archived)
  • See if class sizes shrink over time
• Social media (official and informal)
  • Sudden disappearance of certain residents
  • Photos of significantly smaller classes than the stated complement
• FRIEDA / ACGME / program handouts
  • Approved number of positions vs. actual residents listed
  • Recent changes in accreditation status

None of these alone prove a problem, but discrepancies between approved and actual numbers should prompt careful questioning.

8. Ask Targeted, Open-Ended Questions

During interviews and especially resident-only sessions, use specific, neutral questions such as:

• “Have any residents transferred out or left the program in the past few years? What were the circumstances?”
• “Do you feel the program is stable in terms of leadership and staffing?”
• “Have there been unfilled positions, or are you currently training fewer residents than you’re approved for?”
• “If someone is struggling, how does the program typically respond?”
• “What are the most common reasons residents here feel dissatisfied or consider leaving?”

You want to hear honest nuance, not rehearsed perfection.

Pay Attention to How People Answer

• Do they pause and look uncomfortable?
• Do different residents give similar or conflicting answers?
• Is there a difference between what residents say in:
  • Large group sessions vs.
  • Small groups vs.
  • One-on-one conversations?

Consistency and willingness to acknowledge imperfection are good signs. Defensiveness, evasion, or fear indicate risk.

---

Distinguishing Growing Pains from True Red Flags

Not every negative sign means you should automatically rank a program last. You need to differentiate normal growth and change from systemic dysfunction that drives residents away.

9. When Turnover May Not Be a Dealbreaker

Some scenarios that might be acceptable if explained transparently:

• One or two residents leaving over several years for clear, personal reasons:
  • Family relocation
  • Spouse/partner match
  • Realization they truly prefer another specialty
• Early-stage new program or new site with:
  • Thoughtful leadership
  • Strong institutional support
  • Clear curricular framework and protected resources
• Recent but stable leadership transition
  • Outgoing PD retired after a long tenure
  • New PD with clear vision and resident support

In these cases, focus on:

• How leadership engaged residents in the transition
• Whether the overall culture feels optimistic and cohesive
• How graduates are doing and speaking about the program

10. When Resident Turnover Should Heavily Impact Your Rank List

You should be very cautious (and consider ranking lower or not at all) if you see:

• Multiple residents leaving program every year without clear, individual reasons
• Consistently fewer residents than approved complement, with frequent unfilled spots
• Leadership unable or unwilling to discuss what happened when residents left
• Residents consistently describe feeling unsupported, unsafe, or ignored
• Evidence that resident departures led to:
  • Persistent coverage gaps
  • Increased workload without added support
  • Worsening morale across multiple classes

In emergency medicine, where burnout and attrition are real threats, training in a program with chronic turnover can:

• Increase your own risk of burnout or depression
• Limit your educational exposure
• Damage your confidence and professional development

Your goal is not to find a perfect program—none exist—but to avoid environments where systemic dysfunction is driving people away.

---

Actionable Steps for Applicants: Protecting Yourself in the EM Match

Putting this all together, here’s a practical framework you can use this application cycle.

Step 1: Pre-Interview Recon

• Review:
  • Program website resident pages over multiple years (if possible)
  • Class sizes vs. stated complement
• Note any:
  • Missing residents year-to-year
  • Big drops in class size
  • Sudden disappearance of leadership or faculty

Make a list of specific questions to ask during your visit.

Step 2: Structured Interview-Day Observations

During your visit, keep a simple mental checklist:

• Are residents:
  • Generally tired but engaged, or exhausted and detached?
  • Able to speak openly when faculty are not present?
• Are class sizes:
  • Consistent with what’s advertised?
  • Vaguely explained if smaller?
• Does leadership:
  • Welcome questions about program challenges?
  • Offer honest, specific answers?

Step 3: Private Resident Conversations

Use any opportunity to speak 1:1 or in small groups with current residents:

• Ask about:
  • Turnover in their own class or the one above/below
  • Perceived reasons people have left
  • Whether they would choose the same program again

You can phrase sensitive questions like:

• “Every program has some residents leave. How has that looked here, and how did it impact you day-to-day?”
• “If you could go back to MS4 and re-rank, would this place still land near the top for you?”

Step 4: Post-Interview Reflection

After each interview, write down:

• Did I hear about any residents leaving program? How was it explained?
• Did the residents seem mostly proud or mostly resentful of their training?
• Did I sense any misalignment between what faculty and residents said?

When finalizing your rank list, weigh resident turnover patterns alongside other factors (location, training quality, fellowship interests, etc.). But do not ignore turnover warning signs, especially if they cluster with other concerns like poor wellness support, unclear feedback systems, or minimal mentorship.

---

FAQ: Resident Turnover Warning Signs in EM

1. How many residents leaving is considered a red flag in an emergency medicine residency?

There’s no exact number, but patterns matter. One or two residents over several years is not unusual, especially for personal reasons. It becomes a resident turnover red flag when:

• Several residents leave from the same class or consecutive classes
• Leadership cannot clearly explain why
• Remaining residents describe significant negative impact on schedules, morale, or training

Always interpret the numbers in context and ask follow-up questions.

2. Is a new EM program with some turnover automatically a bad choice?

Not necessarily. New programs may have “growing pains” and occasional residents leaving program as systems evolve. Evaluate:

• Transparency about early challenges
• Institutional backing (funding, faculty recruitment, ED volume)
• How responsive leadership is to feedback
• Trends: Are things stabilizing or getting more chaotic?

A new program with honest leadership and improving systems may be a better environment than an older program with entrenched problems and ongoing turnover.

3. What if residents seem happy but there have been several departures?

This can still be concerning. Ask:

• “Why did those residents leave, and how did the program respond?”
• “Did their departure change your workload significantly?”
• “Have there been changes to address the reasons they left?”

If the departures have clear, personalized explanations and residents genuinely feel things have improved or stabilized, it may be acceptable. If explanations are vague and no program-level changes are evident, consider this a warning sign.

4. How should resident turnover factor into my final rank list?

Use turnover as one of several key safety and quality indicators. A program with repeated residents leaving, leadership opacity, and visible low morale should be ranked cautiously, even if it’s in a desirable location. Conversely, a program with minimal, well-explained turnover and engaged residents is more likely to support you through the inherent challenges of an emergency medicine residency.

When in doubt, prioritize environmental health and support over prestige or geography. Choosing a stable, transparent, and supportive program is one of the best protections you have against burnout and early career regret in EM.

---

For emergency medicine applicants, the EM match is not just about getting in—it’s about choosing a training environment where residents learn, grow, and graduate, not one where they’re trying to find the exit. Pay close attention to resident turnover patterns and the stories behind them; they often reveal far more about a program than any brochure or website ever will.