Recognizing Resident Turnover Warning Signs in Preliminary Medicine

Understanding Resident Turnover in Preliminary Medicine

Resident turnover is a powerful signal about the health of a training program—especially in a preliminary medicine year (prelim IM), where residents already face unique pressures and transitions. When multiple residents leave a program early, ask for transfers, or warn applicants away, it may indicate deeper program problems that will directly impact your training, wellbeing, and future fellowship or advanced-position prospects.

For prelim residents, the stakes are higher because:

• You usually have only one year to build relationships, secure strong letters, and prepare for your next step.
• You are often dependent on this program for timely evaluations and support for your categorical or advanced specialty match.
• You typically have less leverage and visibility than categorical residents, making it even more important to choose a stable environment.

This guide explains resident turnover warning signs in preliminary medicine, how to evaluate them during interview season, and what questions to ask so you can recognize a potential resident turnover red flag before you rank your list.

---

Why Resident Turnover Matters So Much in a Prelim IM Year

Resident turnover isn’t just about numbers. It affects the culture, workload, education, and reputation of a program. For a prelim IM resident, these consequences are magnified.

1. Workload and Schedule Instability

When multiple residents leave or transfer:

• Remaining residents may cover extra night shifts, jeopardy call, or cross-coverage.
• Rotations may be frequently rearranged at the last minute.
• Clinic, ED, and ward coverage may become chronically understaffed.

In a one-year prelim position, you’re already on a tight clock. Increased workload and chaos can make it significantly harder to:

• Study for Step 3 or specialty board exams.
• Prepare for interviews for advanced positions or fellowships.
• Build strong mentoring relationships and research experiences.

2. Educational Quality and Faculty Engagement

High turnover can signal that:

• Teaching is inconsistent or not prioritized.
• Faculty are often unavailable, burned out, or disengaged.
• Conferences and didactics are frequently canceled due to service needs.

For prelim residents who are often trying to transition into another specialty or program, you need solid, well-structured clinical exposure to present yourself confidently as a capable intern.

3. Professional Reputation and Future Opportunities

Programs with ongoing residents leaving program patterns sometimes develop a reputation in the region or across specialties. This can indirectly affect:

• The perception of your training environment by fellowship or advanced position PDs.
• The ease with which you can obtain strong letters of recommendation (if faculty turnover is high too).
• Your ability to maintain wellness long enough to perform well on rotations and interviews.

A single resident transferring for a family reason is normal. Repeated or unexplained turnover is different—and should prompt closer scrutiny.

---

Key Resident Turnover Warning Signs to Watch For

You’ll rarely see a big red banner that says “program problems here.” Instead, you’ll notice patterns, inconsistencies, and evasive answers. Below are core resident turnover warning signs that should raise your index of suspicion—especially when they cluster together.

1. Multiple Recent Residents Leaving or Transferring

What to look for:

• Several residents from the same class have left within the past 1–3 years.
• Residents have transferred to other IM or prelim programs (not just categorical specialty switches).
• People mention that “a few people didn’t finish” but provide vague or evasive explanations.

This is one of the clearest markers of a resident turnover red flag. One person leaving is understandable. A consistent pattern is not.

How to probe:

• Ask residents:
  • “In the last few years, have any residents left the program or transferred out?”
  • “Were their departures mostly for personal reasons, or were there issues with the program itself?”
• Ask leadership (politely, neutrally):
  • “How has resident retention been over the last few years?”
  • “Have there been any significant changes you’ve made in response to residents leaving?”

You’re not looking for a perfect record of zero departures; you’re looking for honest, concrete explanations and clear evidence that the program acknowledges and addresses problems.

2. High Dependence on Off-Cycle Hires and Transitional Coverage

Some programs repeatedly:

• Bring in off-cycle prelim residents to fill gaps.
• Rely heavily on moonlighters or non-resident providers to staff core inpatient services.
• Have frequent “emergency” schedule changes because of sudden staffing shortages.

This pattern often reflects chronic instability, which could be due to residents leaving, problematic working conditions, or unsustainable call structures.

Red flag pattern:
“Last year we had to bring in a couple of new prelims mid-year because people left, but it’s fine now,” said with no structural changes described, or residents still complaining about workload.

3. Discrepancies Between What Residents and Leadership Say

This is a classic signal of internal tension. Examples:

• Program directors describe the environment as “very supportive” and “like a family,” but residents:
  • Use cautious wording.
  • Seem tired or guarded.
  • Don’t echo that same enthusiasm.
• Leadership claims “everyone finishes,” but residents mention:
  • “We’ve had a few leave over the years.”
  • “Some people just couldn’t handle the workload.”
• The PD emphasizes wellness initiatives, yet residents describe:
  • Frequent 28–30 hour shifts.
  • Not getting their days off.
  • Difficulty scheduling medical appointments.

When you hear two different versions of reality, default to the one expressed by current residents, especially those not directly chosen to represent the program to applicants (ask to speak with random or off-duty residents if possible).

4. Evasive Answers About Resident Turnover or Program Changes

Pay attention not just to what is said, but how it’s said.

Potential warning signs:

• “We did have some residents leave, but that happens everywhere,” with no specifics.
• “That was an isolated situation,” repeated multiple times for different departures.
• Vague references to “fit issues” or “personal reasons” without any mention of program-led reflection or improvements.
• Leadership quickly changing the subject when you ask about ACGME citations, internal reviews, or resident surveys.

Every program faces criticism and challenges, but strong programs can talk openly about it and show evidence of improvement.

5. Negative Culture Around Feedback and Complaints

High resident turnover frequently coexists with a dysfunctional feedback culture. Warning signs include:

• Residents tell you:
  • “We try not to complain too much—they don’t like that.”
  • “People who speak up don’t always get the best rotations.”
  • “You just have to keep your head down for the year.”
• There is no clear process for:
  • Anonymous feedback.
  • Reporting mistreatment.
  • Resolving schedule or duty-hour violations.
• Residents say things like:
  • “We’ve tried to bring things up, but nothing really changes.”

In a one-year prelim IM role, you risk spending your entire year in a culture where your voice does not matter. That’s not just unpleasant—it can be professionally dangerous if you need advocacy for advanced positions, remediation, or personal issues.

6. Obvious Burnout and Low Morale Among Residents

Burnout itself doesn’t always equal a program red flag—residency is hard everywhere. But when burnout is widespread and unacknowledged, it often correlates with turnover.

Look for:

• Residents repeatedly describing morale as “rough,” “low,” or “survival mode.”
• Casual comments like “We just need to make it through” or “It’s only a year, right?”
• Visible tension between residents and leadership during meetings.
• Residents strongly discouraging you from ranking the program highly.

For prelim IM residents, where many are simultaneously applying for advanced spots, chronic burnout may leave you too exhausted to focus on your future.

---

How to Investigate Resident Turnover During Interviews

Interview day is your best opportunity to gather direct information. Aim to verify whether a program’s turnover is isolated and well-managed or part of an ongoing pattern of program problems.

1. Questions to Ask Current Residents

Here are targeted, non-confrontational questions you can ask:

About turnover:

• “Have any residents left the program early in the last few years? How was that handled?”
• “Have residents ever felt the need to transfer out because of workload or culture issues?”
• “Do you feel the program learns from resident departures and tries to improve?”

About culture and support:

• “How does the program respond when residents struggle—academically or personally?”
• “If you had to choose again, would you still rank this program where you did?”
• “Do you feel comfortable raising concerns without retaliation?”

About prelim-specific issues:

• “How integrated are prelim medicine residents with the categorical IM residents?”
• “Do prelims get fair evaluation and access to mentors for letters?”
• “Have any prelims had to leave the program unexpectedly, and what happened?”

Note whether residents volunteer information about prior problems and how they were fixed. Honest acknowledgment + clear improvements is a good sign. Confusion, awkward silence, or very carefully scripted answers are not.

2. Questions to Ask Program Leadership

You can ask PDs and APDs more formal versions of similar questions:

• “How would you describe resident retention over the last five years?”
• “Have there been any major changes in the program driven by resident feedback?”
• “What are you most proud of in this program, and what are you actively trying to improve?”
• “How do you support prelim IM residents in their next-step applications?”

You’re watching for transparency, specifics, and humility, not perfection.

3. What to Observe Outside of Formal Sessions

Much of your assessment will be based on tone and behavior, not just words:

• At noon conference:
  • Do residents seem engaged or utterly checked out?
  • Is attendance decent, or are most residents missing due to service pressure?
• In hallways and break rooms:
  • Do residents interact with each other respectfully?
  • Do they complain constantly about staffing or treatment?
• During Q&A sessions:
  • Are residents free to answer questions without a PD hovering in the room the entire time?
  • Do junior residents contradict or qualify what senior residents say?

Where possible, try to talk to residents one-on-one or in smaller groups away from leadership.

---

Interpreting Turnover in Context: When It’s a Red Flag vs. When It’s Not

Not all turnover equals a toxic program. The key is to differentiate normal movement from systemic problems—and to consider how this specifically affects a preliminary medicine year.

When Turnover Is Less Concerning

Turnover may be relatively benign when:

• Departures are clearly explained as:
  • Family relocation or spouse/partner job moves.
  • Career changes (e.g., someone switching from IM to radiology).
  • Health issues or personal crises, handled with compassion.
• Leadership and residents share the same story consistently.
• Residents can describe positive changes made after any problems:
  • “We had some burnout issues a few years ago, but they added a night float system and improved coverage.”
  • “We had an ACGME citation about duty hours, but they’ve restructured the call schedule and now it’s much better.”

In these cases, it might not be a resident turnover red flag, but rather a sign that the program can adapt—which is a good attribute.

When Turnover Suggests Serious Program Problems

You should be more cautious when:

• Departures repeatedly involve residents citing workload, mistreatment, or lack of support.
• There’s clear pattern: multiple people from the same class or same PGY level have left.
• Both prelim and categorical residents have left, or there’s high faculty turnover as well.
• Residents hint that they’d discourage you from coming if you have other options.

For a prelim IM position, ask yourself:

• Can I realistically tolerate this environment for one year without jeopardizing my health or career goals?
• Will I be able to get the clinical exposure, letters, and mentorship I need despite the instability?
• Would I be better off ranking a slightly less “prestigious” but more stable and supportive program higher?

Sometimes, a well-run community program with low resident turnover may serve you far better than a name-brand program with chronic residents leaving program issues.

---

Strategies for Protecting Yourself as a Prelim Applicant

You cannot control program culture, but you can control how thoroughly you evaluate programs and how you structure your rank list.

1. Use Multiple Information Sources

Don’t rely solely on the interview-day sales pitch.

Combine:

• Current resident conversations (including off-line emails or alumni you find on LinkedIn).
• Fellowship and advanced program PD perspectives if you have mentors who know the program.
• Program website trends (sudden expansion, change in leadership, or lack of updated resident lists).
• Word of mouth from upper-level residents at your home institution who have rotated or interviewed there.

If multiple independent sources hint at problems or frequent departures, take it seriously.

2. Prioritize Psychological Safety and Support

In a high-intensity intern year, your ability to safely ask for help matters as much as the raw strength of the clinical exposure.

Ask yourself:

• If I struggled academically, would this program try to help me or try to get rid of me?
• If family or health issues came up, would they work with me or treat me as a burden?
• Do I see evidence of mentorship, formal support structures, and sincere wellness efforts?

High turnover sometimes reflects a culture where residents are easily discarded rather than supported. That culture can be particularly harsh to prelim residents, who are sometimes seen as “just here for a year.”

3. Rank List Strategy for Prelim Medicine

When finalizing your rank list:

• Place stable, transparent programs with:
  • Reasonable schedules.
  • Honest acknowledgment of weaknesses.
  • Consistent resident satisfaction. above programs with big-name reputations but murky turnover stories.
• Consider diversifying your options:
  • Include a mix of academic and community-based prelim IM programs.
  • Give extra weight to programs where prelim graduates have clearly matched well into advanced positions.
• If you detect clear resident turnover red flags plus evasiveness, consider ranking that program significantly lower—or not at all—unless you have no alternative.

Your prelim year should be a launchpad, not a survival exercise.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. Is some resident turnover normal, even in good programs?

Yes. Even excellent programs will occasionally have a resident transfer, withdraw for health/family reasons, or change specialties. Normal turnover is usually:

• Infrequent (a small number over several years).
• Well-explained (residents and leadership share a consistent, reasonable story).
• Accompanied by evidence that the program learns from problems when they occur.

What’s concerning is patterned, repeated departures—especially for reasons like poor support, toxic culture, or unmanageable workload.

2. How worried should I be if a program had a few residents leave during COVID or a major transition?

Context is crucial. Many programs went through stress during COVID surges, leadership changes, or hospital mergers. Ask:

• “What has changed since then?”
• “How do residents feel about the program now?”
• “Has resident retention improved in the last couple of years?”

If residents describe clear improvements and current morale seems good, past turnover may be less relevant. If the problems are ongoing, it’s more likely a true red flag.

3. Do prelim medicine residents experience more turnover than categorical IM residents?

Not necessarily, but prelim positions can be more vulnerable to:

• Being treated as “temporary fill-ins” rather than long-term colleagues.
• Receiving less attention from leadership and mentorship.
• Bearing the brunt of coverage needs when others leave.

During interviews, specifically ask how prelims are supported, how integrated they are with categorical residents, and whether any prelim-specific issues have led to residents leaving early.

4. What should I do if I match into a program and later discover serious red flags or high turnover?

If you’re already in the program and encounter major concerns:

• Document issues (duty hour violations, mistreatment, unsafe staffing).
• Use internal reporting structures (chief residents, PD, GME office, ombudsperson).
• Seek support and advice from mentors outside the program and your specialty society.
• If necessary, discuss options for transfer or remediation with trusted faculty and GME.

Early, honest communication and a documented record of attempts to address problems are essential if you need to pursue alternative options.

---

Resident turnover is one of the clearest windows into a program’s true culture. For those entering a preliminary medicine year, recognizing resident turnover warning signs can mean the difference between a brutal, chaotic year and a demanding but supportive experience that truly prepares you for your next step. Use your interviews, questions, and observations wisely—and give yourself permission to prioritize stability, support, and honesty over prestige when you build your rank list.