Essential Guide to Letters of Recommendation for US Citizen IMG in ENT

Why Letters of Recommendation Matter So Much in ENT for a US Citizen IMG
Otolaryngology (ENT) is one of the most competitive specialties, and for a US citizen IMG or an American studying abroad, letters of recommendation (LORs) can be the deciding factor between getting interviews and being filtered out.
Program directors often use LORs to answer three questions they can’t fully get from scores and transcripts:
- Can you perform at the level of a US medical graduate in a surgical field?
- Do people actually enjoy working with you in a high-stress OR and clinic environment?
- Do you have real, observed potential as an otolaryngologist—not just a generic “good student”?
As a US citizen IMG, you are often competing with U.S. MD students who have had easier access to home ENT departments. Strong, specific letters can:
- Validate that you can thrive in a U.S. academic setting
- Demonstrate that attendings know you well enough to vouch for you
- Compensate, to some extent, for not having a home ENT program or being abroad
Your goal is not simply to “get three or four letters.” Your goal is to build a strategic portfolio of LORs that collectively show:
- Confirmed interest and potential in otolaryngology
- Strong clinical performance in U.S.-based settings
- Evidence of professionalism, teamwork, and teachability
- Endorsement from recognized ENT faculty whenever possible
The rest of this guide will walk you step-by-step through who to ask, how to get strong LORs, timing, and what specifically matters for US citizen IMGs applying ENT.
How Many and What Types of Letters Do ENT Programs Want?
Most otolaryngology programs through ERAS typically require:
- 3 letters of recommendation (some allow 4)
- At least 2 letters from otolaryngology faculty are strongly preferred for a competitive application
- A mix that usually looks like:
- 2 ENT faculty letters
- 1–2 additional letters (ENT, related surgical specialty, or research mentor)
As a US citizen IMG, to compete well in the otolaryngology match, aim for:
Minimum:
- 2 strong ENT letters from U.S.-based faculty
- 1 strong non-ENT clinical letter (ideally surgical or ICU)
Ideal (if you can):
- 3 ENT letters (at least 2 from U.S. academic ENT departments)
- 1 research letter (preferably ENT-focused and from U.S. faculty)
Use ERAS to assign the most ENT-heavy letters to ENT programs. You can still have a more general mix if you end up dual applying, but that’s beyond this article’s scope.

Who to Ask for Letters: Prioritizing ENT vs Non-ENT for US Citizen IMGs
1. Priority #1: U.S. Academic ENT Faculty From Rotations
The absolute best LORs for ENT residency applications usually come from:
- ENT faculty at U.S. academic centers where you:
- Completed a sub-internship / audition rotation
- Took significant responsibility in clinic and OR
- Were directly observed over 2–4 weeks or longer
These letters help overcome a common concern about US citizen IMGs and Americans studying abroad:
“Will this applicant adjust smoothly to a U.S. surgical training environment?”
When choosing which ENT faculty to ask:
Prefer people who:
- Worked with you consistently (clinic + OR + rounds)
- Saw you manage patients, follow through on tasks, and respond to feedback
- Are known to write detailed, supportive letters (ask residents quietly)
Do not overvalue “big names” if they barely know you. A clear, enthusiastic letter from a mid-level faculty who watched you work is far more powerful than a vague, generic letter from a department chair who met you twice.
Example of a strong ENT letter-writer:
Dr. Smith, associate professor of otolaryngology, worked with you during a 4-week sub-I. You staffed 10–15 patients per day with him in clinic, scrubbed in his OR cases twice a week, and he saw you present on rounds and follow through on consults. Residents mention that he’s fair but detailed in his letters. This is an ideal person to ask.
2. Priority #2: ENT Research Mentors (Especially at U.S. Institutions)
If you have research experience in ENT, your research PI can be an excellent letter writer, especially if:
- You worked with them for 6+ months
- Met 1:1 or in small group regularly
- Took ownership of a project (data collection, stats, abstract, manuscript)
- They can attest to your work ethic, curiosity, and follow-through
A research-focused letter is particularly valuable when:
- You are an American studying abroad and had limited U.S. clinical exposure
- Your research is at a U.S. ENT department and you’ve presented at conferences
- You’re aiming at academic or research-heavy programs
But research letters alone cannot replace clinical ENT letters. Ideally, they complement them.
3. Priority #3: Non-ENT Clinical Letters (Preferably Surgical)
Programs understand that as a US citizen IMG, you may not have a home ENT department. Non-ENT clinical LORs can still be very important, especially if they:
- Come from U.S. faculty
- Describe your clinical performance in a hands-on setting
- Demonstrate you can function safely and independently at an intern level
High-yield non-ENT letter writers for ENT applications:
- General surgery attendings
- Surgical subspecialties (neurosurgery, plastics, ophthalmology, thoracic, vascular)
- ICU / anesthesia faculty (demonstrating critical care, airway, and teamwork)
- Internal medicine or pediatrics attendings, if they know you well and can speak to your reliability, communication, and patient care in depth
When deciding who to ask:
- Prefer attendings who:
- Directly supervised your work
- Saw you on call or in higher-acuity situations
- Have written letters for residents who successfully matched in competitive specialties
4. Letters from Your International Medical School Faculty
These can still play a role, but they are usually supplemental, not central, in competitive ENT applications. They are most helpful if:
- The faculty member knows you extremely well (e.g., multi-year mentor)
- They can give detailed, concrete examples of leadership, academic performance, and character
- They hold notable positions (e.g., department chair) and write strong, specific letters
As a US citizen IMG, don’t rely on only international letters for ENT. Aim to pair them with strong U.S.-based ENT and clinical letters.
How to Get Strong LORs (Not Just “Fine” Ones)
The key difference between a usable letter and a truly strong LOR is specificity. Programs are looking for letters that answer, implicitly:
- “Would I want this person on my team at 3 a.m. during a difficult airway or postoperative complication?”
- “Is this US citizen IMG clearly ready to function at the same level as a U.S. graduate?”
Here’s how to help your writers craft those kinds of letters.
1. Plan Early and Strategically
If you are an American studying abroad, you must think about LORs months in advance:
12–18 months before ERAS:
- Identify potential U.S. ENT elective or sub-I opportunities
- Apply early for away rotations (VSLO/VSAS or direct outreach)
- Explore research positions (short-term or year-long) in ENT
6–9 months before ERAS:
- Schedule your ENT sub-Is and U.S. rotations where you’re likely to get letters
- Clarify expectations with yourself: you’re “on audition” every day
2–3 months before ERAS:
- Confirm which attendings you will ask
- Give them plenty of time (4–6 weeks) to write
2. Perform Like Someone They Want as a Colleague
A letter reflects your behavior. To get a strong LOR, you have to earn it through consistent performance:
Clinical habits that result in powerful letters:
Preparation:
- Read about common ENT problems before clinic (otitis media, sinusitis, hearing loss, head & neck cancer basics)
- Before the OR: know indications, anatomy, steps, and key complications of each case.
Ownership:
- Follow 2–4 patients closely on your service
- Know their vitals, labs, imaging, and overnight events
- Pre-round and have a plan ready for rounds
Work ethic:
- Arrive early, stay until the work is done
- Volunteer for tasks (notes, consent forms, simple orders within scope, patient calls)
- Help co-students, not just focus on yourself
Teachability:
- Ask thoughtful questions at appropriate times
- Accept feedback without defensiveness
- Show visible improvement during the rotation
Attendings are more likely to write strong letters when they see you as:
“A hard-working, mature, teachable person whom I’d trust with my patients and would happily have as a resident.”
3. Make It Easy for the Writer to Be Specific
When you ask for a letter, you’re also giving your attending the raw material they need to write a strong endorsement instead of a generic paragraph.
When you request a letter, provide:
- Your CV
- Your ERAS personal statement draft (even if not final)
- A brief one-page summary with:
- Bullet points of cases or patients you were involved with
- Any notable feedback they gave you
- Projects or presentations you did with them
- Your specific interest in ENT and your match goals (e.g., academic vs community, particular geographic preferences)
Say explicitly (in a professional way) that you are hoping for a strong, detailed letter of recommendation.

The Right Way to Ask: Timing, Phrasing, and Follow-Up
When to Ask
Ask for letters while you and your performance are still fresh in the attending’s mind:
- For a 4-week ENT sub-I:
- Ask in the final week or within 2–3 weeks of finishing the rotation
- For research mentors:
- Anytime after you’ve worked with them closely for several months, especially after a project milestone (abstract submitted, presentation, manuscript)
Avoid waiting until August or September if your last contact was in the spring.
How to Phrase the Request
If asking in person (ideal on U.S. rotations):
“Dr. Johnson, I’ve really enjoyed working with you this month and I’m planning to apply to otolaryngology this cycle. I was wondering if you’d feel comfortable writing a strong letter of recommendation for my ENT residency applications?”
If they hesitate or seem unsure, accept that politely and do not push them. A lukewarm letter is worse than none.
If asking by email (common when you’re back abroad):
Use a clear subject line:
- Subject: Letter of Recommendation Request – [Your Name], Otolaryngology Applicant
Keep the body concise and professional, including:
- Who you are and when you worked together
- Your intent to apply to ENT
- Your materials (CV, personal statement, summary sheet) attached
- ERAS instructions and deadline
Following Up Without Being Annoying
After they agree:
- Send a thank-you email with all attachments and instructions
- Politely remind them 2 weeks before your internal deadline if the letter hasn’t been uploaded yet
If the deadline is approaching:
- One more gentle reminder is reasonable; beyond that, consider alternate writers if needed
Example follow-up:
“Dear Dr. Johnson,
I hope you’re doing well. I wanted to kindly check in about the letter of recommendation for my otolaryngology residency application. ERAS recommends having letters in by [date], so if you’re able to submit it by then, I would be very grateful. Please let me know if there’s any additional information I can provide.
Best regards,
[Your Name]”
Special Considerations for US Citizen IMGs and Americans Studying Abroad
1. Balancing U.S. vs International Letters
For the otolaryngology match, particularly as a US citizen IMG, priority should be:
- U.S. ENT clinical letters
- U.S. research/academic letters (preferably ENT-related)
- Strong U.S. non-ENT clinical letters
- Excellent international letters from your home institution
You don’t need to hide your international origin; instead, anchor it with:
- Evidence you have already succeeded in U.S. healthcare settings
- Letters saying explicitly that your performance equals or exceeds that of typical U.S. grads
2. Converting Observerships into Useful Letters
Pure observerships rarely produce strong letters because faculty can’t comment on:
- Your clinical decision-making
- How you manage tasks
- How you handle call or emergencies
If you only have an observership:
- Try to convert it into more active involvement, if possible:
- Case discussions
- Chart review tasks
- Research collaboration
- Ask for a letter only if the faculty has seen enough of your work to speak in specific terms
Otherwise, use observership faculty more as networking contacts and seek LORs from rotations where you had documented responsibilities.
3. Addressing Gaps or Weaknesses Through Letters
If you have any perceived weaknesses (step failures, extended graduation, limited ENT exposure), a good LOR can help:
- A mentor can explain context (“He took a year for family reasons and spent that time doing ENT research and publishing.”)
- Letters can emphasize growth and resilience (“She actively sought feedback, remediated her weaknesses, and was functioning at intern level by the end of our rotation.”)
If you anticipate this, you can discreetly discuss it with a trusted mentor before they write. Never script what they should say, but you can share your concerns and ask for guidance.
4. Should You Waive Your Right to See the Letter?
For ERAS, you’re asked whether you waive your right to view your LOR.
- Strong recommendation: Yes, waive it.
Program directors typically view waived letters as:- More candid
- More trustworthy
If you have doubts that a letter will be positive, you probably shouldn’t ask that person in the first place.
Practical Timeline for ENT LORs as a US Citizen IMG
Here is a sample timeline for someone applying in September as a US citizen IMG:
January–March (Year Before Match)
- Identify U.S. ENT elective/sub-I opportunities
- Apply to away rotations (VSLO/VSAS or direct emails)
- Reach out for ENT research opportunities
April–July
- Complete first U.S. ENT sub-I or elective
- Ask for LOR during or right after the rotation
- Start or continue ENT research; build relationship with PI
July–August
- Complete second ENT sub-I (if possible) or a strong U.S. surgical rotation
- Ask for additional LORs during/after each rotation
- Finalize CV and personal statement to send to writers
August–Early September
- Confirm that all LORs are uploaded to ERAS
- Assign strongest ENT-heavy letters to ENT programs
- Submit your ERAS application as early as feasible
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
1. I’m a US Citizen IMG without any ENT department at my school. How many ENT letters do I realistically need?
Aim for at least two strong ENT letters from U.S.-based faculty, ideally from audition rotations or electives. If you can’t get three ENT letters, combine:
- 2 U.S. ENT letters
- 1 strong U.S. surgical or ICU letter
- (Optional) 1 research or international mentor letter
Programs understand your structural limitations, but they still want to see some first-hand ENT evaluation in a U.S. setting.
2. What if I have to choose between a “big name” ENT chair who barely knows me and a mid-level faculty who worked with me daily?
Always choose the person who knows you well and can write specifically about you. A short, generic letter from a famous name rarely helps and can even hurt if it reads like they barely remember you. A mid-level faculty who can say:
“I watched this applicant pre-round, present, and take ownership of complex head and neck patients every day for four weeks…”
…is far more valuable in the otolaryngology match.
3. Can a non-ENT research letter help my ENT application?
Yes, especially if:
- It shows long-term mentorship
- Highlights your work ethic, reliability, and academic skills
- Comes from a U.S.-based investigator in a respected department
However, it should supplement, not replace, ENT and clinical letters. ENT programs still want direct evidence that you’ve functioned effectively in ENT or related clinical environments.
4. How do I know if my letter is “strong” if I never see it?
You can’t know perfectly, but you can minimize the risk by:
- Asking explicitly if they can write a strong letter
- Choosing attendings who:
- Know you well
- Gave you positive feedback during the rotation
- Have written letters for successful competitive applicants in the past
- Avoiding anyone who hesitates, seems unsure, or doesn’t respond to your request clearly
If they say yes enthusiastically and you’ve performed well, that’s usually enough reassurance.
For a US citizen IMG or American studying abroad, excellent letters of recommendation are not optional—they are a cornerstone of a successful ENT residency application. Focus on real clinical performance, intentional networking with ENT faculty, and early planning, and your LORs can transform your application from “unknown risk” to “promising future otolaryngologist.”
SmartPick - Residency Selection Made Smarter
Take the guesswork out of residency applications with data-driven precision.
Finding the right residency programs is challenging, but SmartPick makes it effortless. Our AI-driven algorithm analyzes your profile, scores, and preferences to curate the best programs for you. No more wasted applications—get a personalized, optimized list that maximizes your chances of matching. Make every choice count with SmartPick!
* 100% free to try. No credit card or account creation required.



















