Elevate Your MD Graduate Residency: A Guide to Research in Preliminary Surgery

Residency is demanding no matter where you train, but as an MD graduate in a preliminary surgery year, the stakes can feel especially high. You’re proving yourself clinically while also trying to position your application for the next match—whether into categorical general surgery, another surgical specialty, or even a different field. One of the most powerful ways to stand out in the allopathic medical school match is to build a strong record of research during residency.

This article walks through exactly how to do that in a prelim surgery residency: what’s realistic, what programs expect, how to design resident research projects, and how to align it all with your career goals and an academic residency track.

---

Understanding the Role of Research in Preliminary Surgery

Why research matters—even in a 1‑year position

A preliminary surgery year (or prelim surgery residency) often feels like a holding pattern: you’re in the OR, on call, covering services, but you don’t have a guaranteed second year. That makes it easy to assume research is optional or “for later.”

In reality, for a MD graduate residency applicant, research can be the deciding factor when you re-apply for:

• Categorical general surgery positions
• Surgical subspecialties (e.g., ENT, neurosurgery, urology, plastic surgery)
• Non-surgical fields that value procedural experience (e.g., radiology, anesthesiology, emergency medicine)

Programs in the allopathic medical school match look closely at:

• Your scholarly productivity (papers, abstracts, presentations)
• Evidence of intellectual curiosity and academic potential
• Your ability to ask and answer clinical questions
• Whether you can contribute to their department’s academic mission

Even one strong project with a meaningful role can set you apart from other prelims and re-applicants.

How research expectations differ for prelim vs categorical residents

Categorical surgery residents often have:

• A protected research year or two (in academic programs)
• Longitudinal infrastructure for resident research projects
• Established mentorship and research tracks

As a prelim surgery resident, you typically have:

• 1 year only, with no promise of continuation
• Heavy clinical workload and frequent call
• Less formal support for long-term research

Programs know this, so expectations are different. You’re not expected to produce the same volume or type of work as a categorical resident with 2 dedicated research years. Instead, they’re looking for:

• Drive and initiative: Did you seek out projects despite time constraints?
• Follow-through: Did you take a project to completion (submission, presentation, publication)?
• Alignment with goals: Does your research make sense with your target specialty?

The bar is: Did you do as much as was reasonably possible in your context—and can you show that clearly on your CV and in your personal statement?

---

Mapping Your Goals: What Are You Trying to Achieve with Research?

Before you agree to any project, you should be very clear about why you are doing research during residency.

1. Strengthening your next match application

Common goals for prelim surgery residents:

• Securing a categorical general surgery spot

  • Highlight outcomes research, quality improvement (QI), or clinical surgical studies
  • Show sustained interest in surgery, not just a “fallback” option

• Matching into a surgical subspecialty

  • Example: prelim year before ENT or plastic surgery
  • Choose projects tied to that field (e.g., head & neck oncology, reconstructive surgery, craniofacial, vascular, thoracic)

• Re-orienting into another specialty

  • Example: deciding to switch into anesthesiology or radiology
  • Focus on perioperative care, imaging-based studies, or anesthesia-related QI

If your goal is an academic residency track down the line, any research that shows analytic thinking, familiarity with methods, and perseverance is helpful—but specialty-aligned work has the biggest impact.

2. Building concrete skills, not just lines on a CV

Think in terms of skills you’ll be able to claim:

• Literature review and synthesis
• Study design (retrospective, prospective, QI, educational)
• Data collection and database management
• Basic statistics or collaboration with a biostatistician
• Abstract writing, poster creation, manuscript drafting
• IRB navigation and regulatory basics

In interviews, you will be asked:
“Tell me about a research project you were involved in. What was your specific role?”
You want a story that clearly demonstrates initiative and ownership, not “I helped a senior resident with some data.”

---

Finding and Choosing Research Opportunities in a Prelim Surgery Year

Your clinical schedule will be intense, so you cannot afford to waste time on poorly structured or stalled projects. Be strategic from the start.

Step 1: Scan the landscape quickly

Within your first 2–4 weeks:

1. Ask your program leadership

   • “Which faculty are most active in resident research projects?”
   • “Are there ongoing projects that need help with data collection or manuscript preparation?”
   • “Is there a department research coordinator or database manager?”

2. Attend departmental conferences

   • Morbidity and mortality (M&M)
   • Journal club
   • Research conferences or divisional meetings
   • Listen for recurring themes or faculty who reference ongoing studies.

3. Meet key faculty in your target specialty

   • Example: if you want vascular surgery, meet the vascular attendings early.
   • Send a short, targeted email: 3–4 sentences stating your background, goals, and interest in participating in a specific type of project.

Step 2: Prioritize project types that are feasible in 1 year

For a prelim surgery residency, high-yield and realistic project types include:

1. Retrospective chart reviews

   • Example: “Outcomes of laparoscopic vs open appendectomy at our institution over 5 years.”
   • Pros: Often no new patient contact, shorter timeline, can lead to abstracts/manuscripts.
   • Cons: Need IRB approval; data cleaning can be time-consuming.

2. Quality improvement (QI) projects

   • Example: “Reducing postoperative urinary catheter days in colorectal surgery patients.”
   • Pros: Highly valued, often easier to implement, can present at hospital or regional meetings; counts as scholarship.
   • Cons: Requires buy-in from nursing, administration, and other services.

3. Case series or case reports

   • Example: Unusual complications, novel approaches, rare diseases.
   • Pros: Faster turnaround; good starter projects; feasible during night float or slower rotations.
   • Cons: Lower impact; choose journals that are appropriate and reputable.

4. Education-focused projects

   • Example: “Impact of a new suturing curriculum on intern performance.”
   • Pros: Great for those interested in teaching; may not need complex statistics.
   • Cons: Need some pre- and post-assessment planning; IRB often required if intended for publication.

In contrast, longitudinal prospective trials, complex basic science, or multi-year registries are usually not realistic for someone in a 1-year prelim position unless you’re joining late in the process as a helper rather than lead.

Step 3: Vet potential projects before committing

When a faculty member offers you a project, ask directly:

• “Is IRB approval already in place?”
• “Is the dataset already existing or will we need to collect from scratch?”
• “What is the goal—abstract, presentation, manuscript?”
• “What timeline are you envisioning?”
• “Given my prelim status, is it realistic to see a product (submission or presentation) within this year?”

Also clarify authorship:

• “If I take responsibility for X, Y, and Z, would I be first author on at least one manuscript or abstract?”

You want at least one project where your role is central enough to justify first authorship.

---

Practical Strategies to Do Research While Surviving a Busy Prelim Year

The challenge is less about finding research and more about executing it despite a demanding schedule. These tactics can make the difference between “I helped” and “I published.”

1. Time-block realistically

You won’t have big chunks of free time; you will have small, consistent windows:

• Post-call afternoons – 60–90 minutes for focused work (data entry, reading, drafting).
• Golden weekends (rare but valuable) – block 2–3 hours for writing or major analysis steps.
• Night float – if your service is quiet at certain hours, use that time for literature review or organizing data (as long as patient care and duty-hour rules remain your top priority).

Make a simple weekly plan:

• 2–3 short sessions (30–60 minutes) dedicated to research tasks
• 1 longer session (1.5–2 hours) for drafting or revising manuscripts

Even this modest structure can yield meaningful progress over a year.

2. Break projects into micro-tasks

Instead of a vague “work on research,” list granular tasks:

• Identify 10–15 key articles and download PDFs
• Read and annotate 2 articles
• Extract and enter data for 10 patients into the database
• Draft introduction section paragraphs 1–2
• Create a table outline for baseline demographics

When you come off a long call shift, it’s hard to start a huge task—but you can handle “enter data for 5 charts” or “edit 1 paragraph.”

3. Use tools to stay organized

• Reference managers: Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote
• Cloud storage: Institution-approved solutions (OneDrive, institutional Google Drive) for shared data (within HIPAA and IRB guidelines)
• Task trackers: Simple spreadsheet or tools like Trello/Notion to track project status (IRB, data, analysis, draft, submission)

Document your specific contributions along the way; you’ll need these details for ERAS, your CV, and interviews.

4. Communicate frequently with your mentor

Schedule standing brief check-ins (15–20 minutes):

• Every 2–4 weeks early in the project
• Monthly once data collection is underway

Use these to:

• Clarify expectations
• Remove roadblocks (e.g., data access, IRB questions)
• Keep momentum (faculty are more engaged when they see you’re invested and reliable)

If you know you’re heading into an especially heavy rotation:

• Email your mentor: “I’ll be on trauma nights for 4 weeks. I can commit to X hours per week and aim to complete Y specific tasks during that time.”

This transparency builds trust and prevents project drift.

5. Leverage built-in requirements

Many programs have:

• Mandatory QI projects
• Journal club presentations
• Resident research day or poster sessions

If you must do these anyway, design them intentionally so they can be expanded into presentable/publishable work:

• Turn a QI initiative into an abstract for a surgical quality or regional ACS meeting.
• Transform a journal club topic into the background/introduction for a small retrospective study.

---

Designing High-Impact Resident Research Projects in Surgery

If you have the chance to shape your own project, aim for something clear, feasible, and aligned with your goals.

1. Start with a focused clinical question

Use the PICO framework:

• Patient/Problem: Adults undergoing emergent laparotomy
• Intervention/Exposure: Early vs delayed enteral nutrition
• Comparison: Early (<24h) vs delayed (≥24h) feeding
• Outcome: Length of stay, complication rate, mortality

Example question:
“In adult patients undergoing emergent laparotomy, is early enteral feeding within 24 hours associated with shorter length of stay compared to delayed feeding?”

This can become a retrospective chart review using existing nutritional and surgical databases in your institution.

2. Match your project to your target field

If you want an academic residency track in:

• General surgery:

  • Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols
  • Surgical site infection reduction
  • Outcomes of minimally invasive vs open approaches

• Vascular surgery:

  • Limb salvage outcomes
  • Comparing endovascular vs open techniques for specific pathologies

• Cardiothoracic surgery:

  • Postoperative atrial fibrillation
  • Long-term outcomes after specific valve procedures

• Plastic surgery:

  • Flap failure rates and predictors
  • Functional outcomes after reconstructive procedures

Programs will see a coherent narrative: “This applicant has consistently pursued research related to the specialty they’re now applying to.”

3. Plan for a tangible product from day one

Before starting data collection, ask:

• What is the primary endpoint and how will we analyze it?
• What conference could this go to (local, regional, national)?
• What journal tier is realistic (top-tier vs niche specialty journal)?

Then reverse-engineer the project:

• If you’re aiming for a regional surgical meeting, an initial dataset of 80–150 patients might suffice for an abstract.
• For a peer-reviewed publication, you may need a more robust sample, refined statistical plan, and tighter narrative.

Build a mini-timeline:

• Month 1–2: IRB and protocol
• Month 3–5: Data collection and cleaning
• Month 6–7: Analysis and figure/table creation
• Month 8–10: Manuscript drafting and revision
• Month 11–12: Submission and response to reviewers

It won’t always follow this perfectly, but having a concrete plan increases the chance you end the year with a submitted product.

---

Integrating Research Into Your Broader Career Narrative

Research is most powerful when it fits into a clear professional story rather than a random assortment of disconnected projects.

1. Clarify your “why” for interviewers

When you apply for your next residency spot, be prepared to explain:

• Why you pursued a preliminary surgery year
• How your research during residency influenced your goals
• What you learned about surgical care, outcomes, or education from your projects
• How this has shaped your interest in an academic residency track (or a clinically focused track with an interest in QI)

Example narrative:

“During my prelim surgery year, I became particularly interested in perioperative outcomes for frail older adults. I joined a retrospective project evaluating postoperative complications in patients over 75 undergoing emergent laparotomy. Working through that dataset, analyzing risk factors and outcomes, and presenting our findings at the state surgical society’s meeting deepened my interest in general surgery with a focus on geriatric surgical care. It also showed me how academic surgeons can improve systems of care for vulnerable populations.”

This kind of story connects your clinical experience + research + future direction.

2. Present your contributions clearly on ERAS and your CV

For each project, specify:

• Your role (e.g., “Designed database, collected and entered data, performed preliminary statistical analysis with biostatistician, drafted results section.”)
• Status (e.g., “Manuscript under review,” “Abstract accepted for presentation,” “Data collection ongoing”)
• Whether it was during medical school vs during residency (important for showing progression)

Programs often appreciate that you continued or expanded your research during residency, especially in a prelim surgery residency environment.

3. Avoid common pitfalls

• Overcommitting: Saying yes to 5 projects but finishing none is far worse than leading one to completion.
• Predatory journals: Avoid low-quality or pay-to-publish outlets that may hurt your academic credibility. Ask mentors for journal recommendations.
• Unclear authorship: Nail down expectations early. Late-stage authorship disputes can derail submissions and sour relationships.
• HIPAA/IRB violations: Be meticulous about data privacy and protocol adherence; violations can have serious consequences.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. Is research really necessary if I’m in a preliminary surgery year and just want a categorical spot?

It’s not an absolute requirement, but it’s a significant advantage. Many applicants for categorical positions have:

• Some form of resident research projects or medical school research
• An abstract or poster presentation
• Demonstrated scholarly engagement

If you’re coming from a prelim surgery residency, research helps:

• Show that you used the year constructively
• Demonstrate your commitment to surgery
• Differentiate you from others who only have clinical experience

Even a single, well-executed project can improve your competitiveness in the allopathic medical school match.

2. I didn’t do much research in medical school. Can I make up for it during my prelim year?

Yes, to an extent. Your prelim year is an opportunity to:

• Start 1–2 well-designed projects with clear endpoints
• Gain concrete skills in literature review, data analysis, and writing
• Secure at least one abstract/presentation or a manuscript submission

You likely won’t build a massive research portfolio in one year, but you can show a meaningful upward trajectory, which programs value.

3. How many projects should I realistically take on as a prelim surgery resident?

For most prelims, a good target is:

• 1 primary project where you have a major role (ideally first author on something)
• 1 secondary project where you have a smaller role (data collection, co-author, etc.)

Beyond that, your clinical demands and duty hour limitations usually make it hard to maintain quality. Depth and completion matter far more than sheer quantity.

4. Does QI count as “real” research for residency applications?

Well-designed quality improvement projects absolutely count as scholarship, especially if they:

• Use a structured methodology (e.g., Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles)
• Collect and analyze data pre- and post-intervention
• Are presented at institutional or external meetings
• Are written up for publication

For surgical fields, QI in perioperative care, infection control, or enhanced recovery pathways is highly relevant and often viewed as very valuable—especially if you’re interested in an academic or leadership-focused career.

---

By approaching research during residency with intention—choosing feasible, relevant projects; managing your time; and securing tangible outputs—you can turn a challenging preliminary surgery year into a powerful platform for your next step. Whether your goal is a categorical spot, a subspecialty, or an academic residency track, the research you do now can significantly shape both your match prospects and your long-term surgical career.