Mastering Pre-Match Communication in Pediatrics Residency: Essential Guide

Understanding Pre-Match Communication in Pediatrics

Pre-match communication in pediatrics residency—the emails, calls, and informal conversations that happen between interview day and Match Day—can feel like the most confusing part of the entire process. Applicants worry about reading between the lines, “love letters,” pre-match offers, and whether a poorly worded email might break NRMP rules.

In pediatrics, where culture and mentorship matter immensely, program communication before match can be particularly intense. Many programs genuinely want to convey interest, and many applicants want to stand out without crossing ethical boundaries.

This guide breaks down how pre-match communication works in pediatrics, what is allowed and not allowed under NRMP rules, how to interpret messages from programs, and how you should communicate back—professionally, honestly, and strategically.

---

1. The Rules: NRMP, Pediatrics, and What “Pre-Match” Really Means

Before talking tactics, you need a solid foundation in the rules and norms.

1.1 What is “pre-match communication”?

In this context, “pre-match communication” means any contact between you and a residency program after your interview and before the rank list certification deadline, including:

• Thank-you emails
• Updates (new publications, improved Step/COMLEX scores, awards)
• “Interest” or “love letter” messages
• Program follow-up emails or calls
• Social media messages (less common but increasingly present)
• Second-look visits (virtual or in-person)

It does not include formal “pre-match contracts” (more relevant in the past and in some non-NRMP positions). For most pediatrics programs participating in the NRMP match, contracts and binding offers before Match Day are not allowed.

1.2 NRMP Match rules that matter

The NRMP (National Resident Matching Program) has clear policies about conduct before and during the Match. Key principles:

• No soliciting ranking information
  Programs cannot ask you how you will rank them. Applicants cannot pressure programs for where they’ll be ranked.

• No guarantees or demands
  Neither side can require a commitment or promise of ranking as a condition for interview or ranking.

• No binding offers before Match (for NRMP positions)
  Pediatrics residency positions in the NRMP Match cannot be offered outside the Match as “pre-match contracts.”

• Verbal “commitments” are not binding
  If someone says, “We will rank you very highly” or “We hope you’ll stay here,” those statements must not be binding or interpreted as guarantees.

Violating these rules risks NRMP violations that can impact both programs and applicants.

1.3 How pediatrics culture shapes communication

Pediatrics is known for being:

• Collegial and relationship-oriented
  PDs and faculty often genuinely want to mentor, support, and encourage applicants.

• Less aggressive than some other specialties
  Compared to some highly competitive fields, peds programs are generally more transparent but also more cautious about staying within NRMP guidelines.

• Community focused
  Programs may emphasize fit, mission, and shared values, which can lead to more heartfelt—but still non-binding—pre-match conversations.

You should expect warm, sometimes personal communication, but framed carefully to avoid NRMP violations.

---

2. Types of Pre-Match Communication You May Encounter

Understanding the common patterns in pediatrics helps you interpret what you’re seeing.

2.1 Routine post-interview communication

From you to programs:

• Thank-you emails (often sent 24–72 hours after the interview)
• Brief messages to:
  • Express appreciation
  • Reiterate specific interests (curriculum, research focus, global health)
  • Clarify anything that wasn’t discussed
  • Mention a strong connection to the city or institution

From programs to you:

• Standardized follow-up emails
  “Thank you for interviewing,” program overview PDF, schedule for upcoming Q&A or “open house,” reminders about deadlines.

• Feedback surveys
  Asking about your interview experience, often run by GME or the department.

These communications are routine and don’t imply anything specific about your ranking or chances.

2.2 Strong interest messages from programs

Some pediatrics programs will send more personalized follow-up communications, such as:

• “We were very impressed with you.”
• “You would be an excellent fit for our program.”
• “We hope you will strongly consider us when you create your rank list.”
• “We anticipate ranking you highly.”

These forms of program communication before match can be encouraging, but they:

• Do not guarantee you a spot.
• Do not obligate you to rank them first.
• Often go to multiple applicants.

Your task is to appreciate the interest without over-interpreting it.

2.3 Applicant “love letters”

Applicants often feel pressure to send some version of a “you are my #1” message. Consider:

• Some programs appreciate a clear indication of strong interest.
• Others ignore such messages or actively discourage them.
• NRMP rules permit you to voluntarily share your ranking intentions, as long as:
  • You are not coerced.
  • You understand that nothing is binding.
  • You do not misrepresent your intentions.

Ethically, you should never tell more than one program that you are ranking them #1.

2.4 Updates and “signals” of ongoing interest

You might send updates to highlight:

• New pediatrics research or publication
• A new leadership role (e.g., AAP section participation)
• A visit to the city that reinforced your interest
• Connection to pediatric populations served by the institution

These are appropriate and common, especially if the update genuinely strengthens your application or clarifies your fit.

---

3. Pre-Match Offers, Early Commitment, and NRMP Boundaries

The term “pre-match offers” can be confusing in pediatrics. Historically, and in some non-NRMP or SOAP-adjacent situations, programs might offer positions outside the Match. But for most pediatrics residency positions in the standard NRMP Match:

• True pre-match offers (binding contracts before Match) are not permitted.
• The “offer” you may encounter is really:
  • A strong indication of interest (e.g., “We plan to rank you highly”).
  • A request that you “consider us strongly” or “let us know if we’re your top choice.”

3.1 Early commitment vs. ranking strategy

You may feel pressure towards early commitment:

• From programs: “We hope you’ll make us your top choice if you feel we’re the right fit.”
• From yourself: fear of missing out if you don’t express clear loyalty.

Key principles:

• The algorithm favors the applicant.
  You should rank programs in your true order of preference, without trying to “game” what programs might do.

• Expressing interest is allowed, but not required.
  Saying “I really enjoyed your program and could see myself thriving here” is fine and honest.

• You are never obligated to reveal your rank list to any program.

3.2 When a program feels like it’s making a “pre-match offer”

Sometimes a message or conversation sounds like:

“We’re very excited about you, and we expect to rank you near the top of our list. If you were to rank us #1, there’s a very good chance you’d end up here.”

Even if well-intentioned, this sort of peds match communication can blur lines. What to keep in mind:

• It is not a contract or guarantee.
• Programs are ranking multiple excellent applicants near the top.
• The NRMP Match algorithm can produce unexpected outcomes.
• You should not alter your true preference order just to chase the program that seems most enthusiastic.

3.3 What is always inappropriate

Red flags for NRMP violations or unprofessional behavior include:

• A program explicitly asking:
  • “Where are we on your rank list?”
  • “Will you rank us #1?”
  • “If we’re your #1, we’ll rank you #1.”
• A program suggesting:
  • “If you don’t commit to ranking us first, we may not rank you.”
• A program pushing for a binding verbal agreement outside the Match.

If this happens:

• Stay professional and neutral in your reply.
• Consider discussing with your dean or advising office.
• In extreme cases, review NRMP’s policy and, if warranted, report a violation.

---

4. How to Communicate with Pediatrics Programs Before the Match

Since you can’t control what messages come in, focus on what you send out: clear, honest, professional communication.

4.1 General principles

1. Be honest.
   Do not misrepresent your ranking intentions. If you don’t know yet, you can say you’re still finalizing your rank list.

2. Be concise.
   PDs receive hundreds of emails. A short, targeted, respectful message is best.

3. Be specific.
   Refer to particular features of the program—curriculum, patient population, advocacy work, NICU, global health—that align with your goals.

4. Respect boundaries.
   One thank-you note per interviewer is usually enough; one or two follow-up messages to the PD or coordinator in total is adequate.

4.2 Post-interview thank-you emails

Most pediatrics programs welcome thank-you messages, though they typically don’t affect ranking much. Consider:

• Sending to:

  • Program director
  • Interviewers (if you have direct email addresses)
  • Occasionally the chief residents if they played a substantial role

• Content (3–6 sentences):

  • Express gratitude.
  • Highlight 1–2 specific details you liked.
  • Reaffirm interest, without overpromising.

Example:

Dear Dr. Smith,

Thank you again for the opportunity to interview at the Children’s Hospital Pediatrics Residency Program. I especially appreciated our conversation about your advocacy curriculum and the chance to hear how residents partner with local schools and community organizations. As someone interested in community pediatrics and health equity, I could see myself thriving in this environment.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]

4.3 Updates and clarifying interest

Appropriate times to send an additional message:

• You’ve accepted a pediatrics research position or published a pediatrics case report.
• You’ve received a major award or honor (e.g., AAP scholarship, Alpha Omega Alpha).
• You’ve had a significant experience reaffirming your interest in their city or institution.

Example (Update + Interest):

Dear Dr. Lee,

I hope you are doing well. I wanted to briefly share an update since our interview in December. I recently learned that a pediatrics quality improvement project I led, focusing on asthma readmissions, was accepted as a poster at the PAS meeting this spring.

This experience has further reinforced my interest in training at an academic pediatrics residency like yours, where there are robust opportunities for QI and research. I remain very enthusiastic about your program and continue to feel that its commitment to underserved urban populations aligns strongly with my career goals.

Thank you again for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]

---

---

5. Handling “We Like You” Messages and Rank Declarations

One of the most anxiety-provoking aspects of pre-match communication is figuring out how to respond when programs express strong interest—or when you want to tell a program they’re your top choice.

5.1 Interpreting strong interest from programs

Typical phrases you might see from pediatrics programs:

• “We plan to rank you highly.”
• “You are among our top candidates.”
• “We hope to see you here in July.”

How to interpret:

• It is genuinely positive. The program likely plans to rank you near the top.
• It is not a promise; they likely send similar messages to multiple people.
• You should not count on it as a guarantee of matching.

Your response can be appreciative and noncommittal:

Thank you very much for your kind message. I truly enjoyed meeting the residents and faculty and left the interview even more excited about the possibility of joining your program. I appreciate the time and thoughtfulness you and the team have invested in my application.

5.2 Telling a program they are your #1 choice

If you have decided with certainty that a particular pediatrics residency will be ranked #1 on your list, you may choose to inform them.

Key principles:

• Do this for only one program.
• Use clear, unambiguous phrasing.
• Do not expect any specific reply; some programs will respond warmly, others may not respond at all.
• You must follow through—once you say it, you should actually rank them #1.

Sample email:

Subject: Expression of Strong Interest in [Program Name]

Dear Dr. Patel,

I hope this message finds you well. After completing all of my interviews and carefully reflecting on where I feel I would be happiest and best supported as I grow into a pediatrician, I have decided to rank the [Institution Name] Pediatrics Residency Program as my first choice.

The program’s emphasis on [example: primary care for underserved populations, strong advocacy training, and resident wellness] aligns closely with my goals of becoming a compassionate clinician and community advocate. My conversations with your residents confirmed that your program provides both rigorous training and a supportive environment.

Thank you again for the opportunity to interview and to learn more about your program. Regardless of the Match outcome, I remain deeply appreciative of the time you and your team have invested in me.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]

5.3 If you’re unsure of your rank list

You may not have a clear #1 until close to the deadline. That is completely normal.

How to communicate:

• Avoid promising anything you’re not certain about.
• You can say:
  • “Your program remains one of my top choices.”
  • “I am strongly considering your program near the top of my rank list.”
• Once you decide, you can send one clear, honest message to your true #1 if you choose.

5.4 When not to send a “love letter”

Avoid:

• Sending multiple programs “you are my top choice” messages.
• Using vague but misleading language (“You are my top program in [city]” when programs might read it as “top overall”).
• Sending repeated, increasingly emphatic messages to the same program; it can feel like pressure.

---

6. Strategic and Emotional Considerations in the Peds Match

Pre-match communication has both strategic and emotional dimensions. Handling both well will make the peds match process more manageable.

6.1 Strategy: What actually affects your chances?

Factors that truly drive match outcomes:

• Strength and breadth of your application (scores, grades, narrative evaluations, letters).
• Fit with program mission and needs (e.g., interest in primary care vs. subspecialty, research vs. community focus).
• Interview performance and interpersonal interactions.
• Rank list strategy: ranking programs in your true order of preference.

Pre-match emails usually:

• Have minimal direct impact on how programs rank you.
• May help programs remember you positively, especially for borderline decisions.
• Are more likely to hurt you if they are:
  • Overly aggressive or demanding
  • Dishonest or contradictory
  • Excessively frequent

6.2 Emotional resilience during the pre-match period

The time between interviews and Match Day can be emotionally draining:

• You may feel pressure to keep “doing something.”
• Silence from programs can feel like rejection.
• A single warm email can create unrealistic expectations.

Recommendations:

• Set limits on how often you check your email and how many messages you’ll send.
• Use a mentor, advisor, or recent graduate to review sensitive messages before you send them.
• Focus on what you can control: crafting a thoughtful rank list and maintaining balance in the rest of your life.

6.3 Common pitfalls to avoid

• Over-communicating
  Sending multiple long, emotional messages to the same program rarely helps and can backfire.

• Comparing yourself to peers
  Different programs have different habits. One person’s “we’ll rank you highly” email doesn’t mean you’re less valued elsewhere.

• Changing your rank list based on late emails
  If you loved Program A and ranked it first, don’t suddenly flip to Program B because they sent a more effusive message the night before the deadline.

---

FAQs: Pre-Match Communication in Pediatrics

1. Do I have to tell a pediatrics residency program how I will rank them?
No. You are never required to share your rank list. You may voluntarily tell one program it is your top choice if you are certain and intend to follow through—but you don’t have to. Many applicants match successfully without ever revealing their ranking plans.

2. Will thank-you emails or “love letters” significantly change my position on a program’s rank list?
Usually not in a major way. For most programs, your application, interview performance, and fit are far more important. However, professional, concise messages can reinforce a positive impression and help borderline decisions. Overly frequent, emotional, or manipulative emails can hurt you.

3. Is it an NRMP violation if a pediatrics program tells me I am ranked highly?
Not necessarily. Programs are allowed to express enthusiasm and indicate strong interest, as long as they do not ask you to reveal your rank list, demand reciprocity, or make binding commitments. The problem arises when they pressure you for information or promise secure outcomes in exchange for your ranking.

4. How should I respond if a program asks directly where I will rank them?
You can stay polite but vague, for example:

“I am still finalizing my rank list, but your program is among those I am strongly considering.”
You are not obligated to answer directly. If you feel pressured or see a pattern of coercive behavior, speak with your dean’s office or an advisor and review NRMP guidance.

---

Navigating pre-match communication in pediatrics requires a blend of professionalism, honesty, and self-awareness. Understand the rules, interpret program signals cautiously, communicate clearly without overcommitting, and—most importantly—build a rank list that truly reflects where you want to train. The Match algorithm is designed to honor your genuine preferences; your best strategy is to let it work in your favor.