Mastering Pre-Match Communication Strategies for MD Graduates

Understanding Pre-Match Communication as an MD Graduate

For MD graduates—especially from allopathic medical schools—pre-match communication can feel like a high-stakes, poorly defined game. You want to show genuine interest, maintain professionalism, and advocate for yourself without overstepping NRMP rules or appearing desperate.

Pre-match communication includes any interaction with residency programs between the time you submit your application and the release of Match results. This can involve:

• Thank-you emails after interviews
• Update letters and letters of intent
• Responses to program-initiated contact
• Clarifying or handling pre-match offers or early commitment discussions (in systems where they exist, such as some non-NRMP programs or certain states)

This article focuses on MD graduate residency applicants in NRMP-participating programs, with attention to how allopathic medical school match processes shape expectations about communication and professionalism.

We’ll cover:

• What’s allowed—and what’s not—under NRMP rules
• How to communicate interest effectively and ethically
• How to handle pre-match offers and early commitment pressure
• How to manage program communication before Match day
• Practical templates and examples you can adapt immediately

By the end, you’ll have a clear, structured strategy for navigating pre-match communication without jeopardizing your integrity—or your chances.

---

1. Rules of the Game: NRMP Policies and Ethical Boundaries

Before you can use pre-match communication strategically, you must understand the rules and where the boundaries lie.

1.1 NRMP Communication Guidelines in Plain Language

For MD graduate residency applicants in the NRMP allopathic medical school match system, these principles are key:

1. No solicitation of ranking information
   Programs cannot ask you:

   • “Where are we on your rank list?”
   • “Are we your number one program?”
   • “Will you rank us to match?”

2. No guarantees or coercion
   Programs must not:

   • Promise that you will match if you rank them highly
   • Offer guaranteed spots conditional on ranking positions
   • Pressure you to disclose your rank list

3. You are allowed to express interest
   You may:

   • Tell a program that you are ranking them highly
   • Tell one program that they are your “top choice” or “number one” (if that is true)
   • Send a letter of intent or update letter voluntarily

4. Verbal expressions are not binding

   • Anything you or the program says about intended ranking is non-binding
   • The Match algorithm uses only submitted rank lists—not emails, calls, or verbal statements

5. Honesty is a professional obligation

   • While expressions of interest aren’t legally binding, misrepresentation (e.g., telling multiple programs they are your “number one choice”) is considered unprofessional and can damage your reputation.

1.2 Distinguishing Different Types of Pre-Match Communication

Common forms of pre-match communication include:

• Thank-you emails (after interviews)
• Letters of interest (to programs you have interviewed with but aren’t necessarily your #1)
• Letters of intent (to your true top-choice program)
• Update letters (significant new publications, awards, etc.)
• Program-initiated contact (emails or calls from PDs, APDs, or coordinators)

None of these, by themselves, change your odds in the algorithm; they influence how programs perceive and rank you.

---

2. Strategic Framework: How to Approach Pre-Match Communication

Instead of sending random emails or copying templates, adopt a strategy. As an MD graduate residency applicant, you should have a structured, ethical communication plan that aligns with your career goals.

2.1 Define Your Tiers of Interest

Start by categorizing programs after your interview season (or as it evolves):

• Tier 1: Top choice

  • Usually 1 program, maybe 2 if you’re genuinely torn (but you should only send one letter of intent stating “number one”).

• Tier 2: Strongly interested programs

  • Programs where you would be excited to match.
  • You send letters of interest (not “number one” claims) and selective updates.

• Tier 3: Solid options / safety programs

  • You may send brief thank-you notes and respond professionally to messages, but no extensive campaigning is needed.

This tiered system helps you prioritize your time and avoid over-communicating in a way that feels insincere or generic.

2.2 Map Communication to Each Tier

Tier 1: Top-choice program

• Post-interview:
  • Thank-you email within 24–72 hours
• Within 2–4 weeks of last interview (or closer to ROL certification deadline):
  • Letter of intent stating clearly they are your #1
• As needed:
  • One concise update if there are meaningful changes to your CV

Tier 2: Strongly interested

• Post-interview:
  • Thank-you email within 24–72 hours
• A few weeks later:
  • Letter of interest expressing strong interest (but not “number one”)
• If new achievements arise:
  • Targeted update letter or short update paragraph

Tier 3: Solid options

• Post-interview:
  • Short thank-you email is usually sufficient
• No further communication may be necessary unless they reach out or you have a specific update/questions

2.3 Core Principles for All Communications

1. Be concise: Programs are inundated with emails. Aim for 1–3 short paragraphs.
2. Be specific: Mention 1–2 concrete aspects of the program that align with your goals.
3. Be honest: Do not overstate your intentions or tell multiple programs they are your “number one.”
4. Be professional: No texting, no casual social media DMs. Email is the standard.
5. Be aligned with your rank list: Never say something in writing that contradicts how you actually plan to rank.

---

3. Crafting Effective Emails and Letters

This section walks through practical examples you can adapt—tailored to an MD graduate targeting allopathic medical school match programs.

3.1 Post-Interview Thank-You Emails

Purpose:

• Reinforce your interest
• Demonstrate professionalism and courtesy
• Keep you on the program’s radar (though evidence for impact is limited)

Timing:

• 24–72 hours after your interview

Template Example (Short and Focused)

Subject: Thank You – [Your Name], [Specialty] Interview on [Date]

Dear Dr. [Program Director Last Name],

Thank you for the opportunity to interview at the [Program Name] [Specialty] Residency on [interview date]. I particularly appreciated learning more about [specific feature: e.g., your resident-run continuity clinic, the emphasis on evidence-based teaching, or your community outreach initiatives].

Our conversation about [specific topic you discussed] reinforced my impression that [Program Name] offers the kind of training environment in which I would thrive. I remain very interested in your program and grateful for your consideration.

Sincerely,
[Your Full Name], MD
AAMC ID: [Number]

Pro Tips:

• Customize one sentence or phrase for each interviewer.
• Do not mention rank list positions at this stage.
• It is fine to send similar but personalized notes to each faculty member you interviewed with.

3.2 Letters of Interest (Tier 2 Programs)

Purpose:

• Signal a high degree of interest
• Differentiate yourself from applicants who never follow up
• Provide a focused reminder of your fit

Timing:

• Typically 3–6 weeks before rank list certification
• Avoid sending too many; focus on 3–7 programs you’d be truly happy to attend

Template Example – Letter of Interest

Subject: Continued Interest in [Program Name] [Specialty] Residency

Dear Dr. [Program Director Last Name],

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to express my continued strong interest in the [Program Name] [Specialty] Residency Program following my interview on [date].

Since our interview day, I have reflected further on my goals as an MD graduate seeking residency training. The combination of [specific program strengths: e.g., structured didactics, diverse patient population, robust mentorship, research opportunities in X] aligns closely with my career aspirations in [field/subspecialty or practice type].

I was particularly impressed by [1–2 program details: e.g., resident camaraderie, curriculum structure, wellness initiatives, commitment to underserved populations]. I can genuinely see myself thriving and contributing positively to your residency community.

Thank you again for considering my application. Please let me know if I can provide any additional information.

Sincerely,
[Your Full Name], MD
AAMC ID: [Number]

Key Point: Avoid phrases like “top choice,” “number one,” or “ranked to match” in letters of interest; reserve those for a single true letter of intent.

3.3 Letter of Intent (Tier 1 – True Top Choice)

Purpose:

• Clearly state that one program is your top choice
• Ethically communicate sincere commitment
• Potentially influence borderline ranking decisions

Timing:

• Typically 2–4 weeks before the rank list certification deadline
• Do not send before you are genuinely certain of your rank list

Template Example – Letter of Intent

Subject: Letter of Intent – [Your Name], [Specialty] Applicant

Dear Dr. [Program Director Last Name],

I hope you are doing well. I am writing to thank you again for the opportunity to interview at the [Program Name] [Specialty] Residency Program on [date] and to share an update regarding my plans for the upcoming NRMP allopathic medical school match.

After careful consideration, I have decided that [Program Name] is my top choice for residency. I plan to rank your program first on my NRMP rank order list.

I am drawn to [Program Name] because of [2–3 specific reasons: e.g., the strong clinical training at your tertiary care center, the emphasis on teaching and leadership development, the supportive culture I observed among your residents, and your program’s commitment to serving the surrounding community]. I believe that your program is the best fit for my goals of becoming [briefly describe your career vision].

Thank you again for your time and consideration. Please let me know if there is any additional information I can provide.

Sincerely,
[Your Full Name], MD
AAMC ID: [Number]

Ethical Reminder: Send only one letter of intent stating “top choice” or “number one.” While it isn’t legally enforceable, professionalism and integrity are critical in medicine.

---

4. Handling Pre-Match Offers and Early Commitment Discussions

In NRMP-participating specialties, formal pre-match offers are generally not allowed for categorical positions. However, MD graduates may still encounter forms of early commitment pressure or ambiguous communication—especially from:

• Prelim-only or non-Match programs
• Certain advanced or fellowship-style tracks
• Programs outside the main NRMP match (e.g., some military, urology, ophthalmology, or independent processes—each with their own rules)
• Informal statements like “If you rank us highly, we’d love to have you”

4.1 Recognizing a Pre-Match or Early Commitment Situation

You might be in a “pre-match offer” or early commitment situation if a program says:

• “We can offer you a position if you commit to us before the Match.”
• “We expect that if we rank you highly, you will rank us to match.”
• “We’re only ranking candidates who tell us they’ll rank us #1.”

For NRMP-participating programs and positions, these statements conflict with NRMP policies. You are not required to agree.

4.2 How to Respond Professionally

If a program makes you uncomfortable with early commitment language, you can respond with a neutral, policy-consistent statement. For example:

“Thank you for your enthusiasm about my application. I am very interested in your program and will be finalizing my NRMP rank list based on overall fit and career goals. I understand that the Match is designed to be fair to both applicants and programs, so I will rely on that process to determine the final outcome.”

If asked directly how you will rank them:

“I’m still finalizing my rank order list and will do so thoughtfully, but I remain very interested in your program and appreciate your consideration.”

This approach:

• Signals interest
• Does not commit beyond what you truly intend
• Aligns with NRMP rules

4.3 Situations Where Pre-Match Offers Are Legitimate

Some positions are formally outside the NRMP main Match (or in specialty-specific matches). In those cases:

• Programs may make legitimate pre-match offers requiring a contract before Match day.
• You should carefully review:
  • Contract terms
  • Geographic and personal implications
  • Whether the position aligns with your long-term goals

Strategy Calls in These Scenarios:

• If the offer comes from a non-NRMP or separate match program:

  • Clarify deadlines and contingencies in writing
  • Discuss with a mentor or your medical school’s career advising office
  • Consider whether accepting would require withdrawing from the NRMP match (as some systems prohibit dual commitments)

• Always get clarity in email on:

  • Whether this is a binding offer
  • What happens if you accept and then later change your mind
  • How it interacts with your other applications

---

5. Optimizing Program Communication Before Match: What Helps and What Doesn’t

Not all communication is equally valuable. As an MD graduate preparing for residency, you want to focus on actions that genuinely contribute to your candidacy.

5.1 Communications That Are Often Helpful

1. Targeted updates addressing major changes

   • New peer-reviewed publication acceptance
   • Major national presentation or award
   • Completion of a meaningful research project
   • A significant additional letter of recommendation uploaded to ERAS

   Example:

   “Since my interview, I have had a first-author manuscript accepted in [Journal Name] on [topic], which further reinforces my interest in [program’s academic focus]. I have attached my updated CV for your reference.”

2. Clarification of logistics or program details

   • If you have genuine, non-trivial questions about:
     • Call schedules
     • Research infrastructure
     • Moonlighting policies (for senior residents)
     • Fellowship track options

   This shows thoughtful consideration rather than generic flattery.

3. Genuine expression of gratitude and interest

   • PDs and coordinators appreciate brief, professional notes of thanks.
   • Overly long or frequent messages, however, can backfire.

5.2 Communications That Often Do Not Help—and May Hurt

1. Repeated, non-substantive emails

   • Weekly “just checking in” messages
   • Re-sending the same CV with minimal updates
   • Excessive attempts to schedule “informal chats” without clear purpose

2. Aggressive or transactional language

   • “If you rank me to match, I will rank you #1.”
   • “Can you tell me if I’m going to match at your program?”
   • “If you don’t respond I’ll assume you’re not interested.”

3. Dishonest or conflicting statements

   • Telling multiple programs they are your unequivocal top choice
   • Claiming intense interest in geographic areas that clearly conflict
   • Overstating your accomplishments (“I led the study” when you were a minor contributor)

5.3 Managing Anxiety-Driven Communication

As Match day approaches, anxiety can push applicants toward over-communication. Protect yourself by:

• Setting a communication calendar:

  • Thank-you emails: within 72 hours of interviews
  • Letters of interest/intent: 2–6 weeks before rank deadline
  • Updates: only when there is a substantial change

• Checking everything against two filters:

  • Professionalism: Would I be comfortable if this email were forwarded to any faculty?
  • Signal-to-noise ratio: Does this add new, meaningful information or value?

---

6. Special Considerations for MD Graduates from Allopathic Programs

Being an MD graduate from an allopathic medical school offers certain advantages and responsibilities in the residency application process.

6.1 Leverage Your School’s Resources

Most allopathic medical schools have:

• Office of Student Affairs / Career Advising:

  • Can review your letters of intent or interest
  • Offer program-specific insights from prior graduates’ experiences

• Specialty advisors and program directors:

  • May have personal relationships with your target programs
  • Can advise whether a particular program is receptive to post-interview communication

When in doubt, run your strategy and key messages by a trusted mentor. This is especially useful if you’re dealing with complex situations such as:

• Mixed signals from a program
• Early commitment pressures
• Deciding between a strong pre-match offer (outside NRMP) and the main Match

6.2 Using Dean’s Letters or Advisor Calls Strategically

Some programs still value a brief call or email from a dean or advisor indicating:

• Your strong interest in the program
• Your readiness for residency and good standing

You should not orchestrate a campaign of multiple faculty lobbying every program. But for a small number of key programs, especially if you are borderline (e.g., step score at the lower end of their usual range, or non-traditional path), a single supportive call/email from a respected faculty member can help.

6.3 Aligning Communication with Your Rank Strategy

Finally, remember:

• The Match algorithm favors applicants; you should rank programs in your true order of preference, independent of what they tell you.
• Pre-match communication is most powerful when it reflects—rather than dictates—your real preferences.

If a program says, “We will rank you highly,” but you would be unhappy there, resist the temptation to move them up just because of flattering emails. Long-term satisfaction beats short-term reassurance.

---

FAQs: Pre-Match Communication Strategies for MD Graduates

1. Do pre-match emails and letters really change my chance of matching?

They rarely change the outcome dramatically, but they can matter at the margins. For example:

• A well-written letter of intent may help a program move you up a few spots if they see you as a strong fit and sense your genuine enthusiasm.
• Letters of interest and updates keep you on the radar and may clarify for programs who is truly committed to them.

However, they cannot compensate for major gaps in your application (e.g., far below-average scores, poor evaluations, or major professionalism concerns).

2. Can I tell more than one program that they are my “top choice”?

You can, but you should not. It is widely considered unprofessional and dishonest. While there is no enforcement mechanism, word can spread through faculty networks. Moreover, integrity is a core expectation of the profession. Send only one explicit “number one” letter of intent.

3. What if a program directly asks how I will rank them?

You are not required to answer—and they technically should not ask in a coercive way. You can respond:

“I am still finalizing my rank order list, but I remain very interested in your program and appreciate the opportunity to be considered.”

This acknowledges their interest without committing beyond what you are comfortable saying.

4. Should I call programs by phone, or is email better?

For almost all MD graduate residency applicants, email is preferred:

• It is less intrusive and easier for programs to manage.
• It provides a written record of what was said.
• Phone calls may be acceptable if invited by the program (e.g., “Feel free to call if you have further questions”) but avoid cold-calling program directors to lobby for ranking.

Use email for thank-you notes, updates, and letters of interest/intent, and reserve phone calls for specific, program-initiated situations or genuinely complex issues where email is insufficient.

---

By grounding your approach in NRMP rules, ethical professionalism, and clear communication strategies, you can navigate pre-match communication with confidence. As an MD graduate aiming for a successful residency match, treat every message as part of your professional identity—and let your words reflect the kind of colleague and physician you intend to be.