
It is November 20th. You just finished your third interview in six days. You are in an airport staring at a boarding gate TV, and your brain is buzzing with fragments:
- “We lose a lot of residents after PGY‑1…”
- That intern who looked like they had not slept in a week.
- The PD who joked, “We don’t believe in duty hours here.”
You know there were red flags today. You also know that in two weeks they will blur into all the others unless you trap them now.
This guide is about what to do starting today, mid‑interview season, to systematically log red flags before your memory sanitizes everything and you talk yourself into bad choices.
Step 1: Today – Stop Trusting Your Future Memory
At this point in the season (roughly mid‑November to early January), you’re:
- Halfway through your interview list.
- Juggling travel, rotations, and maybe Step 3 or research.
- Starting to mix up “which program had the malignant chief?” and “who said they never have time to pre‑round?”
Your first job: accept that your raw memory will not be reliable.
Today’s 30‑minute reset
Before you schedule one more interview, do this today:
Create a simple, repeatable logging system Do not overbuild this. If it is clunky, you will not use it. I recommend a 3‑layer system:
Layer 1 – Immediate brain dump (fast, messy)
- Notes app on your phone.
- A physical pocket notebook.
- Or a single running document titled:
Interview Debrief – 2024–2025.
Layer 2 – Structured red flag tracker (short, consistent)
- Spreadsheet or table with defined columns:
- Program
- Date
- Red flag category
- Short description
- Severity (1–5)
- “Would I rank here?” (Yes/Maybe/No yet)
- Spreadsheet or table with defined columns:
Layer 3 – Narrative reflection (optional but powerful)
- 5–10 sentence paragraph per program capturing vibe, culture, and anything that made you uneasy.
Back‑enter data for interviews you already did Same day you read this, sit down for 30–45 minutes and go back through every interview so far. For each program:
- Write a 3–5 bullet “memory snapshot”:
- What residents actually said.
- How people treated support staff.
- Any weird comments about work hours, attrition, fellowships.
- Then extract specific red flags into your tracker.
- Write a 3–5 bullet “memory snapshot”:
Do not wait. Every additional day, your brain rewrites what happened to reduce dissonance. I have watched people convince themselves that the PD who negged them in the interview was “probably just having a bad day.”
Step 2: Build a Red Flag Template Before Your Next Interview
Your next interview might be tomorrow or next week. You want to walk into it with a pre‑decided checklist that you will fill in the same day.
Here is a lean template that works.
| Category | Example Trigger |
|---|---|
| Workload & Hours | Chronic 80+ hour weeks, no days off |
| Resident Culture | Fear, apathy, visible burnout |
| Leadership & Support | PD unavailable, no advocacy |
| Education Quality | “Service over education” mentality |
| Outcomes & Attrition | High dropout, poor boards, weak fellowships |
| Professionalism | Disrespect, harassment, ethical concerns |
For each interview going forward, your goal is to log at least one concrete observation per category—even if it is “No concerns noted.”
Convert vague feelings into logged data
Before your next interview day:
Create a note template you can quickly duplicate with sections:
- “Resident panel quotes”
- “PD/faculty comments”
- “Schedule/coverage reality vs brochure”
- “Things that made me uneasy”
- “Things that impressed me”
Pre‑add your red flag categories so you are prompted to think in those lanes.
Then, right after the interview—on the plane, in the Uber, or in the hospital cafeteria—fill it out while the details are raw.
Step 3: Same‑Day Routine After Every Interview (Mid‑Season and Onward)
From this point in interview season, treat same‑day documentation as non‑negotiable. Here is what your post‑interview day should look like, time‑boxed.
Within 30 minutes of finishing the social / last session
Goal: Capture exact words and images before your brain edits them.
Do:
Dump everything into your Layer 1 capture:
- Direct quotes that bothered you.
- Names / roles linked to comments. (“APD, Dr. X: ‘If you want work‑life balance, this is not the place.’”)
- Physical observations: exhausted interns, residents leaving at 9 pm, empty conference room that was “always full of teaching.”
Mark anything that felt “off” with a simple tag:
??if you are not sure why it bothered you.!!if your gut reaction was strong.
Do not worry about organizing yet. Just get it out.
That evening (10–20 minutes)
Goal: Translate the mess into your structured red flag tracker.
Take your raw notes and enter:
Program name and date.
For each concerning point:
- Assign a category (from the table above).
- Rate severity on a 1–5 scale:
- 1–2: Mild concern, explainable, or one‑off.
- 3: Moderate, cannot be ignored, needs context.
- 4–5: Serious, likely rank‑list changing.
Write a 1–2 sentence narrative answering:
- “What about this would affect my daily life?”
- Example: “Senior resident admitted she is regularly staying until 10 pm post‑call. Suggests systemic violation of duty hours and poor backup.”
At this point, you should also log initial rank tier for that program:
- Top, middle, low, or do‑not‑rank.
You are not committing. You are giving your future self a baseline to compare against later.
Step 4: Weekly Mid‑Season Review – Patterns, Not One‑Offs
Around mid‑season (roughly once a week during heavy interview weeks), you should take 20–30 minutes and zoom out.
You are not just chasing isolated red flags. You are looking for patterns.
| Category | Value |
|---|---|
| No / Minor | 12 |
| Moderate | 5 |
| Severe | 3 |
Once a week, ask yourself:
Which categories keep lighting up?
- If 6 different programs have culture concerns (residents cynical, no one smiles, people warn you “it gets better after PGY‑2”), that is data.
- If only 1 program has scary attrition numbers, that might be an outlier.
Which programs triggered multiple categories?
- One offhand comment is noise.
- A program with:
- Residents visibly miserable
- PD joking about duty hours
- And hand‑wavy answers about board pass rates
…is probably not “just having a rough year.”
Are you starting to normalize red flags? I have watched applicants slide from “I would never accept 90‑hour weeks” in October to “I mean, we all work hard, right?” in January.
Look at your earliest notes and see what used to shock you. If you are now tolerating worse behavior at other programs, that is a sign of cognitive drift, not better judgment.
Use this weekly review to:
- Mark some programs as “rank only if desperate” or “DNR (do not rank)”.
- Note any programs you want to clarify with follow‑up emails or second looks.
Step 5: Mid‑Season to Late‑Season – Prepare for Rank List Reality
By late December into January, you will start to feel pressure:
- Classmates raving about certain “prestige” programs.
- Faculty advisors pushing name‑brand institutions.
- Your own fear of not matching.
This is where your logged red flags become armor. You are no longer squaring off name vs. vibe. You are comparing concrete data you wrote in real time, before the anxiety kicked into high gear.
End‑of‑Season consolidation (early January)
Set aside 60–90 minutes when:
- Most interviews are done or nearly done.
- You are not post‑call and fried.
Run through each program’s entry and add:
- Final severity score: maybe something moved from a 3 to a 2 after more context, or from a 2 to a 4 after hearing the same story from alumni.
- Deal‑breakers: hard “No” items, such as:
- Documented chronic duty hour violations.
- Multiple residents leaving the program.
- Overt sexism, racism, or unprofessionalism.
- Serious patient safety concerns laughed off by leadership.
Then explicitly write for each program:
“Given what I know, would I accept a match here over going SOAP or reapplying?”
If the answer is no, you do not rank it. Period. I have seen people ignore their own logged red flags and spend three years in a miserable program because “it was prestigious” and “everyone told me to rank it.”
Step 6: Concrete Tools – What This Can Actually Look Like
Let me pull this out of the abstract and show you specific tools that work in the wild.
Example: Simple 1‑page tracker layout
Columns in a Google Sheet or Excel:
- Program
- Date
- Initial gut tier (Top / Mid / Low / DNR)
- Red flag count (Mild / Moderate / Severe)
- Main categories triggered (comma separated)
- One‑sentence summary
- Final tier (adjusted later)
- Would accept match? (Y/N)
| Program | Red Flag Count | Main Categories | Final Tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metro Gen IM | 3 (2 mod, 1 sev) | Workload, Culture, Attrition | Low |
| Lakeside Peds | 1 (mild) | Education | Mid |
| CityMed Surgery | 4 (3 sev) | Workload, Culture, Prof. | DNR |
You do not need anything fancier than this to make very clear decisions later.
Example: Daily note template
Use this same template for every program starting now:
- Program:
- Date:
- Interview format (virtual / in‑person):
- Residents – what they actually said:
- “__________”
- “__________”
- What I saw that concerns me:
- …
- Questions where answers were vague or evasive:
- …
- Red flag categories triggered (with severity):
- Workload – 4/5
- Culture – 3/5
- Initial rank tier: Top / Mid / Low / DNR
- Would I sign a contract here tomorrow if this were my only offer? Yes / No / Unsure
Answering that last one while the day is fresh cuts through a lot of later rationalization.
Step 7: Handling the “Maybe I’m Overreacting” Thought
You are going to have this thought. Probably multiple times:
“Maybe I am being too harsh. Every program has issues.”
Correct. Every program has issues. But not every program has the same type and density of issues.
Your red flag log lets you differentiate:
Benign rough edges
- “Call room is ugly.”
- “Didactic schedule is not glamorous but functional.”
Not great, but not life‑altering.
Program‑defining problems
- “Residents admit they are scared to ask for help.”
- “Chief describes interns as ‘expendable.’”
- “APD says, ‘If your partner can’t handle you never being home, that is their problem.’”
When you see the latter written, scored, and categorized across multiple programs, it is much harder to gaslight yourself later.
Step 8: Protecting Yourself From Confirmation Bias
Mid‑season, two big traps hit:
- Prestige blindness – overlooking red flags because the program is “top tier.”
- Fear bias – elevating safer‑feeling community programs despite major training deficiencies, just because they seem “nice.”
Your solution is boring but effective: standardize how you evaluate everyone.
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| Step 1 | Finish Interview Day |
| Step 2 | Immediate Brain Dump |
| Step 3 | Same Day Structured Log |
| Step 4 | Assign Categories and Severity |
| Step 5 | Weekly Pattern Review |
| Step 6 | Adjust Program Tier |
| Step 7 | Pre Rank List Review |
Treat MGH and your local community hospital the same way in your tracker:
- Same categories.
- Same 1–5 severity scale.
- Same “Would I accept a match here?” question.
If you start shaving severity off for big‑name programs, you will see it in your own sheet. And that is your cue to recalibrate, not to double down.
Step 9: Integrate Future‑You’s Needs (Lifestyle, Family, Goals)
Category: “Future of medicine” is not just about AI and telehealth. It is also about you not burning out by PGY‑2.
Mid‑season is when people start ignoring their own future:
- Partners they will barely see.
- Kids they plan to have.
- Subspecialty interests that require strong fellowship placement.
You need to log red flags that matter particularly for your future:
- For someone who wants to do academics:
- Red flag if: No residents matching into competitive fellowships, minimal research support.
- For someone with a family or caregiving duties:
- Red flag if: Leadership mocks work‑life balance, zero flexibility stories, no parental leave examples.
- For someone already feeling burnt out:
- Red flag if: Every resident’s answer to stress management is “I just power through.”
Add a column to your tracker:
“Future‑me clash?” Yes/No + short note.
That one column will matter a lot when you are ranking.
Step 10: Final Pre–Rank List Pass (Late January / Early February)
By the time you are building your rank list, your system should give you:
- A quick visual sense of which programs are clean vs. problem‑heavy.
- Written narratives reminding you of how each day actually felt.
- A short list of absolute no‑go red flags you promised yourself you would not ignore.
In that final week before certification:
Sort your tracker by:
- Final tier.
- Number of severe (4–5) red flags.
For any program with:
- Multiple severe red flags or
- Any deal‑breaker category triggered
…review your notes and explicitly answer: - “Why am I still considering this?”
- If your only answer is prestige or fear, that is weak justification.
For borderline programs:
- Re‑read the exact quotes you logged.
I have seen people completely change their mind after re‑reading:“We do not complain because it does not change anything.”
vs.
“We are busy, but leadership listens and has made real changes.”
- Re‑read the exact quotes you logged.
Same workload. Entirely different culture.
| Category | Value |
|---|---|
| Immediate Dump | 10 |
| Evening Log | 20 |
| Weekly Review | 30 |
FAQ (Exactly 3 Questions)
1. How detailed do my notes really need to be?
Aim for specific but short. One paragraph plus a handful of bullet points per program is usually enough. The key is to record concrete examples and exact quotes, not vague impressions like “weird vibe.” If you capture who said what and how it would affect your daily life, you will have what you need later.
2. What if my classmates loved a program I flagged heavily?
Trust your own data. Different people tolerate different cultures and workloads. If your log shows multiple high‑severity red flags that clash with your priorities, do not let someone else’s excitement erase that. You are not ranking for them. You are ranking for the person who has to live there for 3–7 years.
3. Is it ever reasonable to rank a program with serious red flags?
Only if you have consciously decided that the trade‑off is acceptable for you and you would truly prefer that program to the risk of SOAP or reapplying. Even then, you should document that reasoning in your notes. If you cannot write a clear, rational justification that still sounds sane a week later, you probably should not rank it.
Key points to carry forward:
- Mid‑season is when memory distortion starts; same‑day red flag logging protects you from your future self.
- Use a simple, standardized system—categories, severity, and concrete examples—to compare programs honestly.
- When you make your rank list, let your own documented concerns, not fear or prestige, drive which programs you actually trust with your training and your life.