Shadowing on Rounds: Decoding Orders, Notes, and Hand‑Offs in Real Time

Most premeds on rounds are just passengers; the few who learn to decode orders, notes, and hand‑offs in real time become unforgettable to attendings.

Let me break this down specifically: shadowing on rounds is not about standing in the back of the herd, nodding politely, and logging hours. If that is all you are doing, you are wasting the highest‑yield exposure you will get before you actually wear a short white coat.

The real skill is learning to “see through” what is happening on rounds: how orders are built from the assessment, how notes drive billing and communication, and how hand‑offs keep (or fail to keep) patients safe. You are not going to place orders or write notes as a premed. But you can absolutely understand the logic chain that connects bedside data to EHR clicks to the night‑float team at 7 p.m.

This is what separates generic shadowing from clinically literate shadowing.

---

Understanding the Ecosystem: What Rounds Actually Do

Rounds are not a walking lecture. They are a structured decision‑making and communication ritual that drives:

• What gets done today (orders)
• How it is documented (notes)
• Who knows about it later (hand‑offs)

Once you see that, every moment on rounds becomes decipherable.

On a typical inpatient service (internal medicine, pediatrics, surgery), rounds integrate four layers:

1. Clinical reasoning – What is happening with this patient and why.
2. Workflow and tasks – Labs, imaging, consults, medications, procedures.
3. Documentation – Progress notes and order sets that “encode” the plan.
4. Transitions of care – How the team tells the next team what to watch for.

Your job as a premed or early medical student is not to perform these tasks. Your job is to track the connections between them in real time, like following a live map.

---

Decoding Orders: From Plan to Clicks

Most premeds hear: “Let’s increase the Lasix and get a BMP this afternoon,” and then… nothing. The words vanish into the air. But that sentence is actually an order bundle that will appear in the EHR within minutes.

How to mentally “trace” an order

On medicine rounds, listen for key action verbs:

• “Start” → new medication or therapy
• “Increase/decrease/hold” → existing order modification
• “Check/obtain/follow” → labs or imaging
• “Consult” → new service involved
• “Reassess/monitor” → observation, vitals, nursing instructions

Then follow the chain:

1. Stated plan at bedside or hallway
   • “We will start IV vancomycin and piperacillin‑tazobactam and draw blood cultures.”
2. Resident or intern opens the EHR
   • Types “vanc” → chooses dose, route, frequency.
   • Enters “piperacillin‑tazobactam 4.5 g IV q6h”.
   • Adds “Blood culture x2, from different sites, prior to antibiotics”.
3. Order fires to different endpoints
   • Pharmacy: verifies dosing, interactions, renal function.
   • Nursing: gets medication administration times and lab collection times.
   • Lab: gets specimen orders and expected processing.
4. Downstream clinical impact
   • If cultures are drawn after antibiotics start, yield is lower.
   • If renal function is poor and dose is not adjusted, toxicity risk rises.

While you obviously will not verify the order, you can mentally track: “That sentence about starting broad‑spectrum antibiotics and getting cultures just became three separate orders across two departments.”

During a lull, you can quietly ask the resident (if the team is receptive), “When you say ‘start vancomycin,’ are you choosing the dose yourself or is that driven by a protocol or pharmacist recommendation?” That kind of question signals you are paying attention to the mechanics, not just the vocabulary.

Common order types you will hear on rounds

On internal medicine or pediatrics services, expect orders around:

• Fluids and electrolytes
  • “Let us change to half‑normal saline.”
  • “Replete potassium if <4.0; get a BMP at 4 p.m.”
• Antibiotics
  • “Narrow from piperacillin‑tazobactam to ceftriaxone now that cultures show E. coli sensitive to CTX.”
• Cardiovascular meds
  • “Restart home beta‑blocker,” “Hold ACE inhibitor with rising creatinine.”
• Diagnostic tests
  • “CT PE protocol,” “Right upper quadrant ultrasound,” “Echo today or tomorrow.”
• Monitoring
  • “Q4 vitals,” “Strict I/Os” (intake and output), “Telemetry for 24 hours.”
• Consults
  • “GI consult for possible endoscopy,” “Cardiology to weigh in on valve lesion.”

If you come in knowing these categories, the apparent chaos of orders begins to sort into buckets. You will not catch everything initially, but you can start building pattern recognition.

How to practice decoding orders as a premed

Before or after your shadowing day, pick one patient the team discussed heavily. Then:

1. Write out the problem list you heard (even if incomplete).
2. Under each problem, list the actions you remember: “check,” “start,” “increase,” “consult,” “consider.”
3. For each action, ask: “What would that look like as an order in the EHR?”
   • “Increase Lasix” → furosemide 40 mg IV BID instead of 20 mg IV BID.
   • “Check BMP at 4 p.m.” → timed lab order.
   • “Consult nephrology” → consult order to nephrology with reason.

You do not need exact doses. The important part: tie clinical intent to an actual, actionable item.

---

Reading Between the Lines of Notes: More Than Just Typing

Shadowing students tend to glance at the EHR screen and see a wall of text. They recognize the patient’s name, maybe a lab value, and not much else. But notes are structured for a reason, and once you know the architecture, they become decodable.

The skeleton of an inpatient progress note

Most progress notes follow some variation of SOAP:

• S – Subjective
  • What the patient reports: pain, shortness of breath, nausea, overnight symptoms.
• O – Objective
  • Vitals, exam, labs, imaging, I/Os, sometimes medication changes.
• A – Assessment
  • The “story”: diagnosis, differential, how the patient is trending.
• P – Plan
  • The to‑do list, grouped by problem: medications, tests, consults, monitoring.

From a teaching standpoint, the Assessment and Plan (A/P) is where clinical reasoning lives. Your goal on rounds is to follow how the spoken A/P maps onto the typed A/P.

Observe this carefully:

1. Intern presents: “For Mr. K, 68‑year‑old male with CHF exacerbation. Overnight he had increased dyspnea but stable vitals. This morning exam shows crackles halfway up bilaterally, 2+ pitting edema. Yesterday he received 80 mg IV Lasix with 1.8 liters of net negative fluid.”
2. Attending asks questions, modifies differential, and then articulates a refined plan: “So for CHF exacerbation with volume overload, he is responding but not quite where we want him. Let us give another 80 mg IV now, strict I/Os, daily weights, and a BMP this afternoon. If creatinine rises further, we might need to back off.”

Now look at how that will appear in the note:

• Problem 1: Acute on chronic systolic heart failure exacerbation
  • Assessment: “Still hypervolemic but improving. Dyspnea slightly improved, ongoing pulmonary congestion, good diuretic response with 1.8 L net negative yesterday. Creatinine trending up slightly.”
  • Plan:
    • “Lasix 80 mg IV this morning; reassess response.”
    • “Continue strict I/Os and daily weights.”
    • “BMP at 4 p.m. to monitor electrolytes and creatinine.”
    • “Oxygen to keep sat >92%.”

You, as a shadowing student, want to notice: the “narrative” part lives in the assessment. The to‑dos you heard become ordered items in the plan, and then become actual orders in the EHR.

How to actually learn from notes without violating boundaries

You should not be browsing random charts on your own. That is a HIPAA violation and a fast way to get banned from a hospital.

What you can do, under supervision:

• When a resident is presenting, glance at the note structure on their screen if they invite you to look.
• After a patient presentation, quietly ask, “Can you show me how you translate that into the A/P in your note?”
• Pay attention to problem‑based formatting: good notes are not “all‑systems,” they are grouped by major problems (CHF, pneumonia, AKI) each with assessment and plan.

If you have access because you are an official medical student (not just an observer), you will eventually write notes yourself. Even before that happens, deliberately practicing re‑constructing the A/P in your own notebook during rounds is powerful.

For example, during each patient encounter, jot:

• Problem 1: [primary issue stated]
  • Assessment: [two lines: trend + current concern]
  • Plan: [bulleted action items]

You will be wrong or incomplete early on. That is fine. When you later hear the resident summarize to the attending, compare your mental note to their real one. That is how clinical reasoning grows.

---

Hand‑Offs: The Hidden Spine of Patient Safety

Hand‑offs are where you see whether the team actually understands what matters. Orders and notes are only as good as the communication to whoever picks up the patient next.

Most premeds never stay late enough or arrive early enough to see this. If you can arrange to observe sign‑out once or twice, you will understand what medicine feels like after the PowerPoints are closed.

What a hand‑off really is

At its core, a hand‑off answers four questions for the incoming clinician (night float, cross‑cover resident, new shift):

1. Who is this patient?
2. Why are they here now?
3. What are we worried about today or tonight?
4. What do you need to do if X happens?

The structure varies by hospital, but common frameworks include:

• I‑PASS:
  • Illness severity (stable, watcher, unstable)
  • Patient summary
  • Action list
  • Situation awareness and contingency planning
  • Synthesis by receiver

Watch carefully for these features:

• Clear statement of illness severity: “He is a watcher, borderline blood pressures.”
• One‑sentence summary: “68‑year‑old with CHF exacerbation, day 3 of admission, improving but still volume overloaded.”
• Action items: “Recheck BMP at 4 p.m.; if creatinine >2.0, page me.”
• Contingencies: “If he becomes more short of breath or needs >4 L oxygen, call the MICU fellow.”

That last category – contingencies – is where safety lives.

How to listen to hand‑offs as a learner

If you get the chance to observe sign‑out:

• Pay attention to which patients take 10 seconds to hand off and which take 3 minutes.
  • Short: predictable, stable, minimal active decisions.
  • Long: evolving problems, uncertain diagnoses, high‑risk events.
• Notice how often lab or imaging results drive action items:
  • “Follow up morning CT scan; if PE positive, start heparin.”
• Listen for “watcher” language:
  • “I am worried about him,” “He could declare himself tonight,” “Track urine output closely.”

Those phrases tell you which patients the team thinks may crash after hours.

After sign‑out, privately ask the resident, “Why did that one CHF patient get labeled as a watcher when his vitals looked okay?” You will get a far more instructive lesson than any textbook paragraph, because it is grounded in a real human with evolving physiology.

---

Real‑Time Strategy: How to Shadow Actively on Rounds

Let us be concrete. You are a premed or early medical student about to start a week or month of inpatient shadowing. Here is how you convert that experience from passive to high‑yield, specifically around orders, notes, and hand‑offs.

Before you show up

Learn just enough structure so the language on rounds is not pure noise:

• Look up:
  • Basic SOAP note format with 1–2 examples.
  • Common inpatient orders: CBC, BMP, CXR, EKG, IV fluids, “NPO,” “PRN.”
  • One hand‑off framework (I‑PASS) so the skeleton is familiar.
• Pick one service focus if you know your rotation:
  • For medicine: CHF, pneumonia, sepsis, AKI.
  • For surgery: post‑op pain, bleeding, infection, ileus.

Knowing these “anchor conditions” will let you follow the A/P discussions more easily.

During rounds: what to track

You cannot track everything. Do not even try. Instead, choose one focal point per patient:

• Patient 1: Track how symptoms → exam → labs → differential diagnosis.
• Patient 2: Track only orders: what specific actions are decided upon.
• Patient 3: Track how the A/P for one problem (e.g., pneumonia) is built and revised.
• Patient 4: Track communication: what is said to nursing, to the patient, to consultants.

For each patient, write down:

1. Top problem as the team defines it.
2. One lab or imaging result that is driving concern.
3. One key action item ordered today.
4. One thing the team is watching for (worry or contingency).

By the end of rounds, you will have a page that looks like a primitive sign‑out list. That is exactly what residents carry.

How to ask questions without slowing the team

Time pressure is real. Your insightful question is not the highest priority when a patient is hypotensive in the next room. So you need timing and phrasing.

Timing:

• Ask questions:
  • While walking between rooms, if the team seems relaxed.
  • When an attending explicitly invites questions.
  • After rounds, during quieter documentation time.
• Do not ask:
  • Inside patient rooms unless invited.
  • When the team is urgently placing orders or getting pages.

Phrasing:

Aim for questions that show you are tracking orders/notes/hand‑offs, not just vocab:

• “When you decided to narrow antibiotics, is that change mostly based on the culture result or how the patient looked today?”
• “You labeled that patient a watcher at sign‑out. Was that more because of her vital signs or because of the trend in her labs?”
• “That sounds like a lot of orders. How do you avoid missing something between what is said on rounds and what actually gets entered?”

These questions implicitly acknowledge the link between speech, documentation, and orders. Physicians immediately recognize that you are not just collecting buzzwords.

---

Anatomy of One Patient Across Orders, Notes, and Hand‑Off

Let us walk through a unified example you can map against when you shadow.

Morning presentation

Intern: “This is Ms. J, 52‑year‑old with uncontrolled diabetes, admitted with right foot cellulitis and possible osteomyelitis. Overnight, temp peaked at 38.5, tachycardic to 110, normotensive, pain controlled. This morning, erythema extended slightly, still tender, no crepitus. WBC 14 from 13 yesterday, lactate normal. She is on vancomycin and piperacillin‑tazobactam, day 2.”

Attending: “I am concerned enough about the possibility of deeper infection. Let us get an MRI of the foot to rule out osteomyelitis, draw repeat blood cultures if she spikes again, and consider ID consult. For now, continue broad‑spectrum antibiotics.”

Orders that follow

In the EHR, the intern enters:

• MRI right foot with and without contrast.
• Nursing order: “Draw two sets of blood cultures if temp ≥38.3.”
• Continue current antibiotics (no change).
• Consider “Infectious Disease consult” later in the day.

You, as the observer, should link: “Concern for osteomyelitis” → MRI order. “Worsening infection” → blood culture orders. Continuing broad coverage → no change to antibiotic orders yet.

Progress note A/P

The intern’s note may show:

• Problem 1: Right foot cellulitis; r/o osteomyelitis
  • Assessment: “Persistent fever and mild progression of erythema on day 2 of broad‑spectrum antibiotics, WBC up‑trending. Concern for possible underlying osteomyelitis.”
  • Plan:
    • “MRI right foot today.”
    • “Continue vancomycin + piperacillin‑tazobactam.”
    • “If temp ≥38.3, repeat blood cultures x2.”
    • “Consider ID consult depending on MRI findings.”

Notice: The language essentially mirrors the spoken plan, broken into assessment vs action.

Hand‑off at the end of the day

Evening sign‑out:

• “Ms. J, 52, diabetic with right foot cellulitis, rule‑out osteomyelitis. On day 2 vanc/zosyn. MRI pending tonight.”
• “Action items: Follow up MRI result. If shows osteo, page our team to start planning for prolonged antibiotics and possible surgery.”
• “If she spikes fever again, nursing will already have orders to draw blood cultures; just monitor. If BP starts to drop or she develops rigors, escalate – she could be tipping into sepsis.”

You can see the same core concerns reframed for a new listener: why she is here, what is likely to change tonight, and what to do in bad scenarios.

When you watch cases like this unfold across a few days of shadowing, you will begin to anticipate what orders, note changes, and hand‑off emphasis will look like as soon as you hear the morning presentation. That anticipatory skill is what early‑stage clinical training is really about.

---

Pitfalls and Misconceptions Premeds Have on Rounds

A few patterns I see repeatedly with premeds and first‑year students:

Mistake 1: Treating everything as equal

Not every order matters equally. Not every lab shift is clinically important. On rounds, teams prioritize:

• Orders tied to life‑threatening conditions (e.g., starting heparin for pulmonary embolism).
• Time‑sensitive diagnostics (e.g., CT head for new neuro deficits).
• Trajectory‑defining actions (e.g., transitioning to oral antibiotics, discharge planning).

If you try to track every Tylenol PRN order, you will miss the signal in the noise. Instead, ask: “What decisions today could meaningfully change this patient’s outcome or disposition?”

Mistake 2: Focusing only on the attending’s words

Students often fixate on attendings because they are the “big authority.” But in terms of orders, notes, and hand‑offs, residents and interns are the ones actually doing the work.

• Watch how interns transform discussion into discrete orders.
• Listen to how residents frame A/P for presentations and hand‑offs.
• Notice how attendings shape reasoning and reprioritize, but rarely type orders themselves.

If you ignore the middle of the hierarchy, you will miss where real workflow lives.

Mistake 3: Over‑valuing buzzwords, under‑valuing structure

Being able to say “acute kidney injury” or “NSTEMI” sounds impressive in a premed personal statement. It does not impress physicians if you cannot follow:

• How that diagnosis appears in the assessment.
• How it drives specific orders (meds held, fluids adjusted, labs timed).
• How it is emphasized in hand‑off (“This is the problem that might blow up tonight”).

Ground your learning in structure first. Vocabulary will follow naturally.

---

How This Level of Shadowing Actually Helps Your Applications

Admissions committees and attendings read thousands of personal statements and hear thousands of “Why medicine?” speeches. Generic content blurs together. But someone who has clearly seen the inner mechanics of care delivery stands out.

Here is what that looks like concretely.

In your personal statement or interview

You do not say:

“I watched doctors on rounds and learned the importance of teamwork and communication.”

You say something like:

“On internal medicine rounds at [Hospital X], I realized that the sentence ‘let us narrow the antibiotics and repeat the BMP this afternoon’ was not casual language. That one line triggered a very specific sequence: an order change in the EHR, a timed lab request, pharmacy review, and a hand‑off note to the night team. Watching how these decisions migrated from bedside reasoning into orders, notes, and sign‑out lists is what first showed me how fragile – and how deliberate – safe patient care has to be.”

That level of detail immediately signals experience that is more than observational tourism.

In early medical school

When you hit your first clerkship, you will not be writing perfect notes. But you will:

• Recognize A/P structure.
• Understand why attendings harp on “clear problem lists.”
• Have a feel for how to translate your plan into actionable orders.
• Respect hand‑offs as critical, not as an administrative chore.

That will make you faster, safer, and easier to teach. Residents notice the student who already understands why “watchers” get longer sign‑outs.

---

Putting It All Together: A Plan for Your Next Shadowing Block

To convert these ideas into action, here is a focused, repeatable approach you can follow for a week on inpatient rounds:

Day 1–2: Orientation to structure

• Goal: Identify SOAP note structure and basic order categories.
• Actions:
  • For each patient, write down:
    • 1‑line identifying summary (age, key diagnosis).
    • Main problem the team is focused on.
  • Listen for specific orders and later ask a resident, “What did you actually enter in the chart based on that plan?”

Day 3–4: Focusing on A/P and orders

• Goal: Track full reasoning chain: assessment → plan → orders.
• Actions:
  • For 2–3 patients, write your own miniature A/P during the case:
    • Assessment: trending better/worse + main concern.
    • Plan: 3–4 action items you heard.
  • After rounds, ask a resident if you can compare your A/P framing (verbally, no PHI in writing) to how they charted it.

Day 5–7: Integrating hand‑offs

• Goal: See how the day team’s plan is communicated to the night team.
• Actions:
  • Ask politely if you can observe one sign‑out session.
  • For each patient handed off, record:
    • Why admitted and current hospital day.
    • Illness severity label (stable/watcher/unstable).
    • 1–2 main action items or contingencies.
  • Notice which elements from the morning A/P show up in the evening hand‑off.

Repeat this cycle every time you shadow on a new service. Over months, the chaos will resolve into patterns.

---

Shadowing on rounds can be a forgettable box‑checking exercise—or it can be your unofficial, unsanctioned “pre‑clerkship clerkship,” where you quietly start learning how medicine actually moves from thought to action.

If you learn to decode orders, notes, and hand‑offs in real time, you will not just look more prepared. You will be more prepared—mentally rehearsing the exact skills you will need when it is your login, your note, and your hand‑off that the team is relying on.

With that foundation, your next step is obvious: get yourself onto a real inpatient team, even if only as an observer, and start running this mental playbook. When you eventually step into third year and receive your first patient list, you will recognize the terrain instead of feeling dropped into a foreign country. The language of rounds will not be new—only your role in speaking it will be.