Evaluating Case Volume: A Guide for US Citizen IMGs in Vascular Surgery

Understanding Case Volume in Vascular Surgery for US Citizen IMGs

For a US citizen IMG (American studying abroad), case volume is one of the most important—and often most confusing—parts of evaluating vascular surgery residency programs. Because you may not have the same home-institution exposure or faculty advisors as a US MD, you must be especially deliberate in understanding how residency case volume, surgical volume, and procedure numbers will shape your training and career.

This article breaks down how to evaluate case volume in an integrated vascular program, what benchmarks to look for, how to interpret case logs critically, and how to discuss volume intelligently during interviews and away rotations. The focus is practical: what you actually need to look for and how to use it to make decisions as a US citizen IMG pursuing vascular surgery.

---

Why Case Volume Matters So Much in Vascular Surgery

1. Vascular surgery is procedure-heavy and skill-dependent

Vascular surgery is extremely technical. You’re expected to master:

• Open arterial and venous reconstruction
• Carotid, aortic, and peripheral interventions
• Complex endovascular procedures (EVAR, TEVAR, complex peripheral work)
• Access surgery (dialysis, ports)
• Hybrid cases with imaging and open exposure

These skills cannot be learned from books alone; they require repetition and progressive independence. That’s where case volume and procedure numbers become critical.

2. Volume drives both competence and confidence

Higher meaningful volume typically correlates with:

• Faster acquisition of core technical skills
• Greater comfort with intraoperative decision-making
• Better understanding of indications, complications, and bailouts
• Readiness for independent practice at graduation

However, raw volume (big numbers) isn’t enough—you need:

• Diversity of cases
• Graduated responsibility
• Proper supervision and teaching

For an American studying abroad without a strong home institution pipeline, demonstrating that you understand these nuances is essential. Program directors will assume many IMGs focus only on name recognition or geography; if you can speak intelligently about case mix and surgical volume, you immediately stand out as a serious applicant.

3. Certification and minimums: the floor, not the ceiling

The Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery (VSB-ABS) and the ACGME set minimum case requirements for vascular surgery residents and integrated vascular program trainees. Every accredited program must meet these—but you should treat these as the bare minimum, not a target.

When you review programs, you want to see that their average graduating resident substantially exceeds those minimums in most categories. That’s a key signal of robust exposure and a healthy case environment.

---

How Vascular Surgery Case Volume Is Structured and Counted

As a US citizen IMG, one of your advantages can be showing you understand how the system works. That starts with knowing how case volume in an integrated vascular residency is typically organized.

1. Integrated vs. Independent pathways and volume expectations

There are two main pathways to vascular surgery:

1. Integrated Vascular Program (0+5)

   • Five-year residency straight from medical school
   • Combines core surgery and vascular training
   • Case volume builds earlier, with vascular exposure often starting PGY-1 or PGY-2
   • By PGY-4–PGY-5, residents are heavily vascular-focused

2. Independent Vascular Fellowship (5+2 or 4+2)

   • General surgery residency followed by vascular fellowship
   • Volume is concentrated in the final 2 years

For US citizen IMGs, the integrated vascular program is usually the main target straight from medical school. This article focuses on integrated programs, but many principles apply to independent pathways as well.

2. How cases are counted

Some key points you should understand and occasionally mention in conversations:

• Each case is logged in an online system (e.g., ACGME Case Log System)
• Residents log role:
  • Surgeon Junior
  • Surgeon Chief
  • First Assistant
• Volume is broken down by procedure category, such as:
  • Open aortic (AAA repairs, thoracoabdominal aortic procedures)
  • Endovascular aortic (EVAR, TEVAR)
  • Carotid (endarterectomy, stenting)
  • Peripheral bypass and endovascular interventions
  • Dialysis access (AV fistula/graft creation and revisions)
  • Venous procedures (DVT thrombolysis, IVC filters, venous reconstructions)
  • Amputations and wound management
  • Access and miscellaneous procedures (ports, diagnostic angiography)

A strong training environment emphasizes primary operator roles (Surgeon Junior/Chief) rather than mostly assistant roles.

3. Interpreting case numbers vs. experience

An example:

• Resident A: 1,000 logged vascular cases, but 60–70% as assistant, limited complexity
• Resident B: 800 cases, but 75–80% as primary operator, with clear progression to chief-level complex work

Resident B may be better prepared for independent practice, despite lower absolute numbers. When evaluating programs, you’re ultimately asking:

“Will I graduate feeling ready to independently manage the full spectrum of vascular disease—technically and clinically?”

---

Benchmarks: What Is a “Good” Case Volume in Vascular Surgery?

You don’t need exact national averages at your fingertips to make sound judgments, but you should understand general benchmarks and principles.

1. Global volume: total vascular cases by graduation

For integrated vascular programs, strong graduates typically log:

• Total vascular cases: Often 850–1,200+ by the end of residency (this can vary by program and year)
• You want to see that:
  • The program’s average is comfortably above the required minimum
  • The program isn’t dependent on one super-busy attending while others are quiet
  • There is enough volume for all residents, not just senior ones

When you ask programs about volume, pay attention to whether they talk in per-resident terms, not just hospital or system numbers.

2. Key domains to examine

When you look at procedure numbers, especially for an integrated vascular program, watch these categories closely:

1. Aortic work

   • Open AAA, thoracoabdominal, and arch work (if available)
   • EVAR and TEVAR volume
   • Complex endovascular (branched/fenestrated grafts, if offered)

2. Carotid disease

   • Carotid endarterectomy (CEA)
   • Carotid stenting (sometimes more limited, often center-specific)

3. Peripheral arterial disease

   • Lower-extremity endovascular (angioplasty, atherectomy, stents)
   • Bypass surgeries (fem-pop, fem-tibial, aorto-bifem, etc.)

4. Dialysis access

   • AV fistulas and grafts
   • Revisions, thrombectomies, interventions

5. Venous and access work

   • DVT thrombolysis, iliac vein stenting, IVC filters
   • Ports and central access (especially early years)

6. Amputations and wound care

   • Major and minor amputations
   • Debridements and wound management

Red flag: a program with unbalanced exposure—for example, strong in dialysis access and amputations but very limited complex arterial or aortic work.

3. Distribution across training years

In an ideal integrated vascular program:

• PGY-1 & PGY-2

  • Mix of general surgery and early vascular exposure
  • Lots of basic procedures: central lines, ports, simple amputations, wound care, basic access
  • Some observation and assisting in more complex cases

• PGY-3 & PGY-4

  • Significant increase in vascular-specific time
  • Independent performance of bread-and-butter vascular cases
  • Growing participation in more advanced procedures

• PGY-5

  • Chief-level responsibility
  • Leading complex open and endovascular cases with attending backup
  • Managing inpatient services and complications with supervision

Programs should be able to articulate how your role changes year-to-year and what kind of volume you can expect at each stage.

---

How a US Citizen IMG Should Evaluate Case Volume Before Applying

You won’t have access to full internal case logs before you match, but you can gather a surprising amount of information by being systematic.

1. Start with publicly available sources

a. Program websites

Look for:

• Mention of case volume or annual vascular procedures
• Lists of vascular faculty and their clinical interests (aortic, endovascular, venous, access, limb salvage, etc.)
• Information about:
  • Hybrid ORs and catheterization labs used by vascular surgery
  • Level of trauma center (can impact emergency vascular exposure)
  • Presence of cardiology and interventional radiology (IR) and how they share cases

As a US citizen IMG, it’s helpful to keep a spreadsheet with columns like:

• Total vascular cases/year (if listed)
• Number of vascular faculty
• Hybrid OR availability
• Aortic/endovascular program?
• Dialysis center affiliation?
• IR and cardiology collaboration notes

b. Institutional publications and social media

Program or department Twitter/X, Instagram, and newsletters often highlight:

• Complex aortic cases, new devices, and hybrid procedures
• Clinical trials in vascular/endovascular interventions
• New faculty hired (often a sign of growing volume)

This doesn’t replace hard numbers, but it tells you whether the vascular division is dynamic and expanding versus stagnant.

c. Case logs in program materials or slides

Some programs share average graduating resident case logs in recruitment slides or open houses. Save these when you see them:

• Screenshot or download PDFs
• Note categories and total numbers
• Compare across programs—this is your best real-world comparison tool short of direct insider information

2. Use structured questions during virtual sessions and open houses

As an American studying abroad, you may not easily attend many in-person pre-application visits. Virtual interactions become critical. Prepare specific, informed questions that show you understand case volume.

Examples:

• “Can you share approximate average case numbers for your recent graduates, especially in open aortic and endovascular categories?”
• “How is vascular case volume distributed among residents? Do all seniors hit similar numbers, or is there competition for complex cases?”
• “What proportion of vascular cases are done by interventional radiology or cardiology versus vascular surgery?”
• “Are there any recent or expected changes in hospital coverage that might impact vascular surgical volume?”

The way programs answer—transparent vs. vague—tells you as much as the numbers themselves.

3. Leverage alumni and current residents

If possible, reach out to:

• US citizen IMG graduates of the program
• Current vascular residents, especially senior ones

Ask questions like:

• “Did you feel your procedure numbers prepared you for independent practice?”
• “Were there any areas where you felt your surgical volume was light?”
• “Was there any competition with fellows (cardiology, IR, or even vascular fellows) for cases?”
• “Around what number of total vascular cases did you graduate with?”

Make clear that you understand this information is approximate; you’re looking for order of magnitude and patterns, not exact values.

---

What to Look For During Away Rotations and Interviews

For US citizen IMGs, away rotations in the US can be the most important tool for evaluating an integrated vascular program’s real-world volume and teaching culture.

1. Observing actual OR and endovascular volume

During an away rotation, track:

• Average number of cases per day across services you see
• How many rooms vascular surgery is running simultaneously
• Whether residents are actively involved or mainly observing
• Types of cases over a week or two:
  • How many EVAR/TEVAR?
  • How many open bypasses?
  • How many dialysis access cases?
  • How many amputations/wounds?

Even in 4 weeks, you’ll form a sense of whether the hospital is busy, moderately active, or relatively slow.

2. Resident autonomy versus attending dominance

Watch carefully:

• Who is doing the key steps in the operation?
  • Are residents performing anastomoses, clamping, and deploying devices?
  • Or are they retracting and suctioning while attendings do all critical steps?
• Do attendings:
  • Let residents perform imaging runs and device delivery in endovascular cases?
  • Have residents close access sites, manage wires, and plan interventions?

A program with strong volume but low autonomy may still leave you feeling underprepared. You want a balance:

• Adequate supervision and patient safety
• Real, progressive responsibility in the OR and hybrid lab

3. Distribution of cases among trainees

Clarify:

• Are there vascular fellows? If yes, how are cases divided between residents and fellows?
• Are there multiple residents per level, and how do they share cases?
• Are juniors routinely scrubbed in on major cases, or are they kept peripheral?

Red flags:

• Residents saying, “We don’t get to do much of the complex work until very late,” and there’s only one heavy chief-level year
• Cases routinely given to fellows while residents mostly assist on minor work

4. Questions to ask during the interview

Good questions that showcase your insight as a US citizen IMG applicant:

• “How is case volume tracked and reviewed for residents? Is there a formal process to ensure residents meet and surpass vascular procedure minimums?”
• “Could you describe a typical operative week for a PGY-3 vs. PGY-5 in the integrated vascular program?”
• “Have there been any recent changes—such as new vascular surgeons, new clinical sites, or loss of coverage—that may affect overall vascular surgery residency case volume?”

Well-phrased questions like these demonstrate that you:

• Understand the importance of surgical volume in vascular training
• Are thinking longitudinally about your development over 5 years
• Are aware that hospital politics and service arrangements can impact volume

---

Balancing Case Volume With Other Key Factors

While case volume is critical, bigger is not always better. As an American studying abroad who must choose programs often at a distance, you should look at volume in context.

1. Volume vs. complexity vs. breadth

Ask yourself:

• Is the program only high-volume in one narrow area, like access and amputations?
• Do you see a healthy mix of:
  • Aortic disease
  • Carotid and cerebrovascular
  • Peripheral arterial disease (endovascular + open)
  • Acute limb ischemia and emergent pathology
  • Venous disease and thoracic outlet (if available)

A program with slightly lower total numbers but a great mixture of open and endovascular may be better than a hyper-volume program with very limited open exposure.

2. Volume vs. burnout and support

High-volume centers can be:

• Excellent training environments
• Also intense and potentially exhausting

Consider:

• Resident wellness and support
• Call schedules and intensity
• Presence of mid-level providers (APPs) who may offload scut work so you can focus on the OR

3. Volume vs. mentorship and teaching

If a program has significant volume but:

• Attendings are not engaged in teaching
• Feedback is limited
• Residents feel like “worker bees”

You may graduate with high procedure numbers but weaker operative judgment. The best training combines:

• Strong case numbers
• Strong mentorship
• A culture that lets you ask questions and learn from complications

For a US citizen IMG, mentorship also matters for:

• Fellowship or job placement
• Networking in a relatively small vascular community
• Guidance on research and future career direction

---

Practical Strategy Summary for US Citizen IMGs

To make this actionable, here’s a stepwise strategy tailored to you as a US citizen IMG targeting vascular surgery:

1. Build a program comparison spreadsheet

   • Columns: program name, number of vascular faculty, hybrid ORs, estimated volume, presence of fellows, any shared cases with IR/cardiology, notable strengths or concerns

2. Gather volume-related intelligence from:

   • Websites and formal case log summaries (if available)
   • Virtual info sessions and Q&A
   • Resident and alumni conversations
   • Away rotations (for a smaller subset of programs)

3. Judge programs on:

   • Overall vascular surgery residency case volume (above minimums, preferably well above)
   • Balance of open vs. endovascular cases
   • Distribution of cases across all residents, not just one superstar
   • Level of resident autonomy, especially by PGY-4/PGY-5

4. Prepare to discuss case volume in interviews:

   • Show you understand that volume is not just a number—it’s about diversity, independence, and readiness for practice
   • Ask focused questions that reveal you’ve done your homework and care about the quality of your surgical training

5. Weigh volume alongside fit and support:

   • Aim for programs where you will be busy, challenged, and supported, not overwhelmed and anonymous
   • Remember that as an American studying abroad, strong training and strong mentorship can both be critical to your long-term success

---

FAQs: Case Volume and Vascular Surgery for US Citizen IMGs

1. What is a “safe” minimum case volume I should look for in an integrated vascular program?
Exact thresholds vary, but you should be more comfortable when programs report average graduating residents with 850–1,000+ total vascular cases, with clear evidence of robust numbers in aortic, peripheral arterial, and access categories. Focus less on one precise number and more on whether graduates consistently surpass ACGME/VSB minimums and feel well-prepared for independent practice.

2. Is a higher-volume but less prestigious program better than a lower-volume big-name center?
For a US citizen IMG, both reputation and training quality matter, but if forced to choose, a slightly less famous program with strong surgical volume, diverse case mix, and good autonomy often leads to a better technical foundation than a prestigious center where you mainly assist and have limited operative responsibility. Ideally, find programs that offer both good case volume and a solid national reputation, but do not sacrifice your technical training for name only.

3. How can I realistically verify case volume claims as an outsider?
Use a multi-source approach:

• Review any published case logs or averages they share
• Ask current senior residents directly about their procedure numbers and perceived preparedness
• Observe OR activity and resident roles during away rotations
• Ask about case volume trends (growing, stable, or declining) and any structural changes (new sites, new faculty, or lost services)
  Look for consistency across these data points rather than relying on a single statement.

4. As a US citizen IMG, will programs worry I can’t handle high surgical volume? How can I address that?
Some programs may have concerns about any IMG’s clinical background or transition to a US training system. You can counter this by:

• Demonstrating strong clinical performance in US rotations
• Highlighting work ethic, resilience, and time-management examples from your experiences
• Talking specifically about how you value surgical volume and deliberate practice
• Showing that you understand ACGME requirements, integrated vascular program structure, and case log concepts
  This reassures programs you’re prepared for the demands of a high-volume vascular surgery residency and serious about becoming a technically excellent vascular surgeon.