IMG Residency Guide: Evaluating Case Volume in Cardiothoracic Surgery

Understanding Case Volume: Why It Matters So Much for IMGs in Cardiothoracic Surgery

For an international medical graduate, cardiothoracic surgery is one of the most competitive and technically demanding fields. Among all the metrics programs use to evaluate applicants, few are as critical—and as misunderstood—as surgical case volume.

Program directors want residents who can become safe, efficient, and independent cardiothoracic surgeons. To get there, you need enough operations, of the right type, at the right level of responsibility, and you need to document them clearly. This article is an IMG residency guide focused specifically on case volume evaluation in cardiothoracic surgery, with an emphasis on how international medical graduates can understand, compare, and present their experience effectively.

We will cover:

• What “case volume” really means in cardiothoracic surgery
• How programs in the US (and similar systems) measure and benchmark volume
• Typical expectations and minimums for heart surgery training
• How IMGs can document, translate, and strengthen their operative experience
• Red flags and common pitfalls in procedure numbers
• Practical steps to boost your competitiveness if your case volume is low

---

1. What Is Case Volume in Cardiothoracic Surgery?

When programs talk about case volume, they rarely mean just a raw number. For cardiothoracic surgery residency, they are evaluating four core dimensions:

1. Quantity – How many procedures you have been involved in
2. Complexity – How advanced or technically demanding those procedures are
3. Role – Whether you were primary surgeon, first assistant, or observer
4. Relevance – How closely those cases match the typical cardiothoracic scope

For an international medical graduate, it is essential to understand and speak this language clearly when you apply to a cardiothoracic surgery residency or fellowship.

1.1 Core categories of cases in CT surgery

Most accrediting bodies (e.g., ACGME in the US) classify cases along similar lines, even if exact labels differ:

• Adult Cardiac
  • Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), on-pump and off-pump
  • Valve surgery (aortic, mitral, tricuspid repair/replacement)
  • Aortic root and ascending aorta procedures
  • Adult congenital repairs
  • Ventricular assist devices (VADs), ECMO cannulation, heart failure procedures
• General Thoracic (Non-cardiac)
  • Lobectomy, segmentectomy, pneumonectomy
  • VATS and robotic thoracic resections
  • Esophagectomy and foregut surgery (depends on program scope)
  • Mediastinal surgery, chest wall resections
• Congenital Cardiac (Pediatric and Adult Congenital)
  • ASD/VSD closure, PDA ligation
  • Tetralogy of Fallot, TGA repairs, single ventricle palliation
• Thoracic Trauma and Emergencies
  • Thoracotomy, sternotomy for trauma
  • Pericardial window, emergent re-entry, cardiac tamponade management

When a program evaluates your residency case volume, they are asking:

• Does this person have broad, balanced experience across these domains?
• Are their procedure numbers sufficiently high to suggest technical growth potential?
• Do their cases show a trajectory of increasing responsibility and complexity?

---

2. How Programs Measure and Benchmark Surgical Volume

Understanding how residency case volume is measured in US or similar systems helps you translate your background into a familiar framework.

2.1 ACGME and case log systems

In the US, cardiothoracic surgery residents and fellows enter every case into a standardized case log system. The system records:

• Type of procedure (using a CPT-type or ACGME-defined category)
• Patient age (adult vs pediatric)
• Approach (open sternotomy, VATS, robotic, hybrid)
• Level of participation:
  • Surgeon (or surgeon junior)
  • First assistant
  • Second assistant / observer

The ACGME specifies minimum numbers that must be met for board eligibility. While exact thresholds may change over time, programs know these benchmarks and take them seriously.

Even if you train outside the US, this structure is a good mental model. When you document your experience as an international medical graduate, you should try to mirror this style:

• Specify procedure category
• Describe your role
• Include counts over time (e.g., by year of training)

2.2 Typical case volume expectations in CT training

To put things in perspective, many US cardiothoracic training pathways (e.g., integrated 6-year I-6 or traditional 2–3-year fellowships) may yield something like:

• Total major cardiothoracic cases: ~250–500+ over the course of training
• Adult cardiac cases: Often >150–200
• General thoracic cases: Often >100
• Congenital heart cases: Varied; may be 20–100+ depending on program focus

These are not universal numbers, but they illustrate rough orders of magnitude that program directors consider reasonable for a fully trained graduate.

When you apply as an IMG, evaluators mentally compare your prior case volume and heart surgery training against these benchmarks, even if not explicitly.

2.3 Quality vs quantity

Cardiothoracic surgery program directors repeatedly emphasize:

A log showing 200 meaningful, well-documented cases as first assistant or primary surgeon can be more impressive than 700 cases where the applicant was mostly observing.

Useful signals of quality include:

• Increasing role from observer → assistant → primary
• Complex cases done later in training
• Clear progression over multiple years
• Cases performed in accredited or high-volume centers

If your case volume is numerically modest but demonstrates solid growth and responsibility, you can still be a competitive candidate—especially when combined with strong references and performance in observerships or fellowships.

---

3. Evaluating Your Own Case Volume as an IMG

Before you write a single line in your application, pause and perform a serious, honest self-evaluation of your operative history.

3.1 Step 1: Categorize all your procedures

Start by extracting your case experience from:

• Hospital logbooks
• Personal Excel sheets or apps
• National databases used in your country (if any)
• OR schedules and operative notes (if logs are incomplete)

Then classify each case into:

1. Adult cardiac
2. General thoracic
3. Congenital cardiac
4. Thoracic trauma/emergency
5. Non-cardiothoracic (e.g., general surgery, vascular) – list separately

Within each category, group by procedure:

• CABG (specify on-pump vs off-pump if known)
• Valve surgery (type of valve, repair vs replacement)
• Aortic procedures (ascending, arch, descending)
• Lobectomy, pneumonectomy, segmentectomy
• VATS vs open; robotic vs thoracotomy
• ECMO, VAD, transplant, etc.

3.2 Step 2: Define your level of participation

For international medical graduates, this is where many applications fall apart. Programs frequently see vague descriptions such as “participated in 150 CABG surgeries” with no detail.

You should classify each case as:

• Primary operator (or leading resident/registrar) – you performed most critical steps under supervision
• First assistant – you handled exposure, graft harvesting, suturing, and critical assistance
• Second assistant/observer – mostly retracting, observing, basic tasks

If your system uses similar but different terminology (e.g., “operator,” “assistant,” “second assistant”), map it transparently to the US-style categories in your CV or personal statement.

3.3 Step 3: Calculate your residency case volume

Create a clean summary such as:

Adult cardiac (Total: 120)

• CABG (on-pump): 60 – 20 primary, 40 first assistant
• CABG (off-pump): 10 – 5 primary, 5 first assistant
• Valve surgery (mitral/aortic): 30 – 10 primary, 20 first assistant
• Aortic root/ascending: 10 – all first assistant
• Misc. adult cardiac (myxoma excision, ASD closure, etc.): 10 – all first assistant

Repeat for general thoracic and congenital. This format speaks directly to how US programs view procedure numbers.

3.4 Step 4: Identify strengths and gaps

Ask yourself:

• Do I have at least 50–100 substantial adult cardiac cases with meaningful participation?
• Do I have exposure to valve surgery, not just CABG?
• Is there any thoracic oncology and lung resection experience?
• Have I done minimally invasive approaches (VATS, robotic) or only open sternotomies/thoracotomies?
• Do my logs show clear progression from observer to primary?

If you already completed cardiothoracic training abroad, programs will expect higher numbers and autonomy. If you are applying to an early pathway (e.g., integrated I-6 or similar), they will be more forgiving and focus on trajectory and potential.

---

4. How Programs Interpret IMG Case Volume in Cardiothoracic Surgery

When a selection committee reviews an IMG’s application for cardiothoracic surgery residency or fellowship, case volume is filtered through several lenses: context, credibility, and comparability.

4.1 Country and training system context

Program directors know that operative exposure varies widely:

• Some countries allow residents to act as primary surgeon on complex CABG and valve cases earlier.
• Others are very hierarchical, with residents mostly observing until late in training.
• Some centers are high surgical volume institutions with strong subspecialization.
• Others are low-volume general hospitals where cardiothoracic work is sporadic.

They will consider:

• Name and reputation of your training hospital
• Whether it is a dedicated cardiac center or a general hospital
• Availability of cardiac anesthesia, perfusionists, ECMO, transplant, etc.
• Presence of structured training (e.g., national board-recognized program)

In this context, an honest, clear description of your environment in your personal statement and letters of recommendation is vital.

4.2 Signals of credibility in procedure numbers

Program directors are wary of inflated or unrealistic case logs. They look for:

• Plausible numbers: For example, claiming 700 CABG cases in 2 years as primary surgeon in a modest-sized center is likely to trigger skepticism.
• Consistency with institutional volume: Your numbers should match what is plausible for that hospital’s annual volume.
• Alignment with letters: If your letter writers describe you as “early in their operative development,” but your log suggests enormous independent experience, there is a mismatch.
• Specificity: Applicants who can discuss specific cases, what they did, and what they learned in detail are more credible than those quoting only big numbers.

Your goal as an international medical graduate is to present accurate and defensible surgical volume that withstands probing interview questions.

4.3 Balancing cardiac and thoracic experience

Different programs emphasize different aspects:

• Some are predominantly adult cardiac (CABG, valves, aortic root, LVADs).
• Others are heavily thoracic oncology (lung resections, esophagectomy).
• A minority are major congenital heart surgery centers.

Your application will be evaluated partly on how your prior exposure aligns with the program’s strengths. For example:

• A program with a strong thoracic focus may value an IMG who has completed many lobectomies and VATS resections, even if CABG numbers are moderate.
• A transplant/advanced heart failure center may be excited by applicants with ECMO and VAD experience, even in smaller numbers.

Research each program’s profile and highlight the most relevant parts of your case volume for that institution.

4.4 Early-career vs. fully trained IMGs

Programs distinguish between:

• IMGs applying for an integrated or early-stage residency (equivalent to a US graduate entering surgery):

  • Expectations: limited independent operating; more exposure and assistance.
  • Focus: potential, technical aptitude, work ethic, academic interest.

• IMGs who are already board-certified or fellowship-trained abroad, applying for advanced positions or fellowships:

  • Expectations: high case volume, including complex cases as primary surgeon.
  • Focus: whether your prior training already meets or approaches board-level expectations.

Be clear about your stage of training and the goals of seeking additional heart surgery training in a new system.

---

5. Presenting and Strengthening Your Case Volume as an IMG

Even if your current surgical volume is not ideal, you can present it strategically and work to improve it.

5.1 How to present your case log in an application

Consider including a one-page structured summary within your CV or as an appendix:

• Organize by category (adult cardiac, general thoracic, congenital, trauma).
• Provide total numbers and breakdown by role (primary, first assistant, observer).
• List only major procedures; minor tasks (chest tube insertions, central lines) can be summarized separately.

Example (excerpt):

Adult Cardiac (2019–2023, University Heart Center, Country X)

• Total cases: 140
  • CABG (on-pump): 65 – 18 primary, 47 first assistant
  • Valve surgery (AVR/MVR): 40 – 12 primary, 28 first assistant
  • Combined CABG + Valve: 15 – 5 primary, 10 first assistant
  • Aortic root/ascending aorta: 10 – all first assistant
  • Misc. (myxoma, ASD closure, LV aneurysm): 10 – 4 primary, 6 first assistant

This is far more persuasive than “participated in 140 cardiac cases” without detail.

5.2 Translating your system into theirs

In your personal statement or a brief explanatory note, you can clarify:

• The typical role of a resident/registrar in your country’s OR.
• Whether “primary surgeon” means you did skin-to-skin under supervision or only the less complex parts.
• What supervision and responsibility look like in your environment.

Being explicit prevents overestimation or underestimation of your skills.

5.3 Using letters of recommendation strategically

Ask your referees (especially cardiothoracic attendings) to:

• Comment on your technical ability relative to peers (e.g., “operates at the level of a graduating resident in our country”).
• Mention approximate case volume and the types of cases you commonly handle.
• Provide concrete examples: “Dr. X has independently performed LIMA harvest and distal anastomoses on CABG under my direct supervision.”

Letters that contextualize your residency case volume in a recognizable way are powerful.

5.4 Strengthening your volume if it is currently weak

If your case volume is lower than ideal or very unbalanced, consider:

1. Extending your training locally

   • A 6–12 month additional cardiothoracic surgery rotation at a higher-volume center in your home country can significantly increase your surgical volume and refine your skills.

2. Targeted fellowships or observerships

   • Short hands-on fellowships (where allowed) in cardiac or thoracic surgery abroad can enhance your exposure.
   • Even observerships without hands-on experience, while not increasing case numbers, can:
     • Show commitment to the specialty
     • Provide US-based letters
     • Familiarize you with local practice patterns

3. Case selection in your current post

   • Volunteer for more on-call and emergency duties (within safe limits).
   • Offer to cover cases others might avoid, especially if they help balance your log (e.g., thoracic cases if you are cardiac-heavy).

4. Documentation from now on

   • Even if you neglected logging in the past, start strict case logging today.
   • Over 12–24 months, consistent logging can dramatically transform your operative narrative.

---

6. Advanced Considerations: Case Volume vs. Competence and Career Planning

Case volume is essential, but it is not the only determinant of success in cardiothoracic surgery. How you use your experience and plan your career path is equally important.

6.1 Volume vs. competence

Training bodies worldwide are moving toward competency-based rather than purely volume-based assessments. This means:

• Doing 100 CABGs does not automatically mean you are competent at CABG.
• Programs increasingly value:
  • Ability to manage complications
  • Good intraoperative judgment
  • Team communication and leadership
  • Pre- and postoperative decision-making

During interviews, you may be asked:

• “Tell me about a complication during a CABG you assisted or performed, and what you learned from it.”
• “What part of valve surgery do you find most challenging technically, and how are you working to improve it?”

Your answers should show depth of reflection, not just big numbers.

6.2 Matching case volume to your long-term goals

Consider your end goals:

• If you aspire to be a high-volume adult cardiac surgeon, you should aim for strong CABG and valve exposure, with increasing autonomy.
• If you are more inclined toward thoracic oncology, pursuing additional thoracic fellowships or high-volume thoracic rotations is wise.
• If you are drawn to congenital heart surgery, early and repeated exposure to pediatric cardiothoracic surgery is invaluable.

Plan your rotations and fellowships with your future niche in mind. Strong general cardiothoracic foundations are essential, but focused, high-quality surgical volume in your chosen area can differentiate you.

6.3 Psychological and ethical aspects of chasing numbers

In competitive environments, it is tempting to “collect cases” aggressively. Guard against:

• Compromising patient safety in the pursuit of more primary cases
• Exaggerating or fabricating procedure numbers
• Accepting cases beyond your true competence without adequate supervision

Remember: your professional reputation will follow you. Ethical integrity in documenting and reporting your case volume is non-negotiable.

---

FAQs: Case Volume Evaluation for IMGs in Cardiothoracic Surgery

1. What is a “good” case volume for an IMG applying to cardiothoracic surgery?

There is no exact cutoff, but for someone who has completed dedicated CT training abroad, programs often expect several hundred total cardiothoracic cases, with a substantial proportion (e.g., 100–200+) in adult cardiac and/or general thoracic, including many as first assistant and a significant subset as primary surgeon. For an IMG applying to early integrated programs, modest numbers with clear progression and strong evaluations can still be competitive.

2. How can I prove my case volume if my hospital does not have a formal log system?

You can reconstruct a retrospective log from:

• Operative notes (where you are listed as operator or assistant)
• OR schedules and electronic medical records
• Department or training program records

Once reconstructed, organize your data into a clear summary and ask a supervisor (e.g., program director or chief of service) to validate and sign a statement confirming that the log reasonably reflects your experience.

3. Will low thoracic volume hurt my chances if most of my cases are cardiac?

It depends on the program. Purely cardiac-focused programs may be comfortable with limited thoracic exposure, especially if you show strong potential and interest in cardiac surgery. However, many cardiothoracic residencies value balanced exposure, and a complete absence of thoracic experience can be a disadvantage. When possible, seek at least some structured thoracic rotations (lung resections, mediastinal surgery, VATS) to round out your profile.

4. Is it better to list only primary cases, or should I also include assistant cases?

You should include both, but be explicit about your role. Assistant cases are important, particularly early in training, and they demonstrate exposure and progressive responsibility. However, programs will pay special attention to how many cases you performed as primary surgeon or leading resident, especially for core operations like CABG and valve surgery. Clarity and honesty about your role are more important than the raw total.

---

By understanding how surgical volume is evaluated and presented, an international medical graduate can transform a simple list of operations into a compelling narrative of growth, technical development, and readiness for advanced cardiothoracic training. Your goal is not just to show that you have “done many cases,” but to demonstrate that your residency case volume and procedure numbers reflect a solid foundation for a safe, thoughtful, and competent career in cardiothoracic surgery.