Empowering Women in Surgery: Inspiring Journeys & Career Insights

Introduction: Women in Surgery Redefining the Field

Women in surgery are transforming a specialty that was once synonymous with rigid hierarchies and masculine stereotypes. Today’s women surgeons are not only excelling technically—they are reshaping what surgical careers can look like, advancing gender equity, and modeling inclusive, patient-centered leadership.

From the first trailblazers who fought simply to enter an operating room, to current leaders building structured medical mentorship programs and advocating for diversity and inclusion, their journeys illustrate how far the profession has come—and how much work remains.

This expanded guide explores:

• The historical context of women in surgery
• Pioneering figures who broke barriers
• Persistent challenges, including gender bias and work–life balance
• Evolving solutions, such as formal mentorship and institutional reform
• Practical advice for students and residents considering surgical careers

Throughout, the focus is on actionable insights for medical students, residents, and early-career physicians who want to build fulfilling surgical careers while advancing equity and inclusion.

---

The Historical Context of Women in Surgery

A Traditionally Male-Dominated Frontier

For most of modern medical history, surgery was emblematic of a “gentlemen’s profession.” Strength, decisiveness, and stoicism were coded as masculine traits, and these stereotypes were used to justify excluding women from surgical training and leadership.

Key milestones help illustrate the slow pace of change:

• 1849 – Elizabeth Blackwell becomes the first woman in the U.S. to earn a medical degree, proving that women could complete rigorous scientific training.
• Late 19th and early 20th centuries – A small number of women gain entry to medical schools and hospitals, but are frequently pushed toward “acceptable” fields like pediatrics and obstetrics rather than surgical specialties.
• 1913 – American College of Surgeons (ACS) is founded. Women can technically be admitted, but their numbers remain extremely small for decades.

Even as women entered medicine, surgery lagged behind other specialties in gender equity. Deeply embedded cultural beliefs that surgery required physical strength, emotional detachment, and total availability (often at the expense of family life) were frequently used to argue that “women would not fit.”

The Long Road to Acceptance in Surgical Careers

The path toward acceptance for women in surgery involved confronting both explicit exclusion and subtle discouragement:

• Institutional barriers: Residency programs that would not consider women applicants; operating room schedules and call patterns that assumed a spouse at home; lack of pregnancy or parental leave.
• Cultural norms: Senior surgeons who openly questioned whether women could “handle” surgery; “old boys’ clubs” that reinforced male networks in hiring and promotion.
• Role stereotypes: Women often steered toward “softer” specialties, while surgical ambition was characterized as unfeminine or incompatible with motherhood.

Even into the late 20th century, women who chose surgery often did so against direct advice from mentors who urged them to “pick something more suitable.” The fact that so many persisted is a testament to their resilience and commitment—and created critical visibility for younger generations.

---

Breaking Barriers: Pioneers and Contemporary Role Models

Dr. Virginia Apgar: A Trailblazer in Perioperative Care

Dr. Virginia Apgar is best known for the Apgar Score, a simple, life-saving system to quickly assess a newborn’s health immediately after birth. While many remember her as a pediatric and obstetric giant, her story is also essential to the history of women in surgery and perioperative medicine.

• She initially aspired to become a surgeon but encountered direct bias and limited opportunities.
• Pivoting to anesthesiology—then an emerging field—she became the first female anesthesiologist at New York’s Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center.
• Her work fundamentally changed perioperative care for both mothers and infants, reinforcing that women physicians could not only participate in, but also redefine, high-stakes clinical fields.

Dr. Apgar’s career illustrates a recurring pattern: when institutions closed traditional surgical doors, women often created new subspecialties, developed novel approaches, and ultimately expanded what surgery and perioperative care could be.

Dr. Amy Lee: Innovating in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Mentorship

Dr. Amy Lee (a composite example inspired by many real surgeons) represents a newer generation of women in surgery who are excelling clinically while also systematizing mentorship and advocacy.

As a minimally invasive and laparoscopic surgeon, Dr. Lee:

• Confronted early skepticism, including patients who assumed she was a nurse, or colleagues who directed technical questions to male peers.
• Built credibility through excellence, gaining a reputation for technically demanding cases and high patient satisfaction scores.
• Launched a structured mentorship program for medical students and residents interested in surgical careers, focusing on:
  • Skills workshops (suturing, knot-tying, laparoscopic skills)
  • Career-planning sessions on choosing a specialty and building a CV
  • Honest discussions about gender bias, pay gaps, and promotional inequities

Her advocacy reflects an important shift: women surgeons are not only succeeding individually; they are deliberately building systems so that those who follow encounter fewer barriers.

Dr. Nadine Bailey: Advancing Gender Equity in Orthopedic Surgery

Orthopedic surgery has historically been among the least gender-diverse surgical fields. Dr. Nadine Bailey, a leading orthopedic surgeon (again, representative of many real-world leaders), has focused her career on both technical excellence and systemic change.

Her contributions include:

• Developing hands-on orthopedic skills workshops specifically welcoming to women, countering stereotypes that orthopedics is “too physical” or “not for women.”
• Leading departmental research on gender disparities in referrals, case assignments, and promotions, generating data that hospital leadership cannot ignore.
• Launching institutional Diversity and Inclusion task forces, ensuring that conversations about women in surgery include intersectional attention to race, ethnicity, sexuality, and disability.

By pairing evidence-based advocacy with visible clinical leadership, Dr. Bailey and others like her have shifted what is considered “normal” in orthopedic departments and beyond.

---

Ongoing Challenges for Women in Surgical Careers

Despite important progress, women surgeons still confront significant obstacles, both structural and cultural. Understanding these barriers is essential for any learner or institution committed to gender equity.

Institutional and Systemic Barriers

Surveys from organizations such as the American Medical Association (AMA) and Association of Women Surgeons (AWS) consistently document:

• Higher rates of reported discrimination among women surgeons compared with their male peers.
• Slower advancement to senior titles (associate and full professor, division chief, department chair).
• Lower compensation, even after adjusting for specialty, academic rank, and years of experience.

Common systemic issues include:

• Opaque promotion criteria that reward informal networking over clearly measured performance.
• “Ideal worker” norms that expect continuous, uninterrupted availability—disadvantaging anyone with caregiving responsibilities.
• Limited access to high-value opportunities, such as complex cases, invited talks, or key leadership committees.

For residents and early-career surgeons, this may show up as being passed over for leading a big case, not being nominated for departmental awards, or not being considered for key roles such as chief resident.

Gender Bias, Stereotypes, and Microaggressions

Gender bias can be overt or subtle:

• Microaggressions:

  • Patients asking, “When will the real surgeon be here?”
  • Staff assuming women physicians are nurses or support personnel.
  • Comments about appearance (“You don’t look like a surgeon”) or family decisions.

• Differential expectations:

  • Women may be expected to take on extra “emotional labor” roles—mediating team conflicts, mentoring disproportionately more students, or serving on many diversity committees—often without recognition in promotion criteria.
  • Assertiveness that is celebrated in male surgeons may be labeled as “aggressive” or “difficult” when displayed by women.

Learning to recognize, document, and respond to microaggressions is now an important part of training in medical professionalism and ethics.

Work–Life Integration and Burnout

Surgical training and practice are demanding for everyone, but women may face unique pressures:

• Fertility and family planning concerns often intersect with residency and early attending years.
• Pregnancy during training can expose women to stigma, scheduling conflicts, and lack of formal policies on leave or accommodations.
• Unequal domestic expectations may mean that women surgeons perform a “second shift” of caregiving at home, increasing the risk of burnout.

Institutions that take gender equity seriously are increasingly:

• Offering transparent, standardized parental leave policies applicable to all genders.
• Creating flexible training pathways or part-time faculty tracks that still allow academic advancement.
• Building on-site childcare or childcare support for extended hours.

For students and residents, it is important to ask explicit questions about these policies when evaluating programs.

---

Building Supportive Systems: Mentorship, Sponsorship, and Inclusive Culture

The Power of Medical Mentorship for Women in Surgery

Mentorship is consistently cited by women surgeons as a key factor in their success. Effective mentorship includes:

• Career mapping: Understanding fellowship options, research opportunities, and academic vs. community pathways.
• Skill-building: Technical feedback in the OR and bedside manner coaching.
• Psychological support: Normalizing setbacks, sharing stories of failures and resilience, and helping mentees navigate discrimination or imposter syndrome.

For students and trainees:

• Seek multiple mentors, including at least one who understands gender-specific challenges and one who is closely aligned with your subspecialty interests.
• Use national programs such as those offered by AWS, ACS Women in Surgery Committees, or specialty-specific women’s sections (e.g., in neurosurgery, orthopedics, cardiothoracic surgery).
• Schedule structured meetings with agendas (e.g., CV review, rotation planning, research goals) to make mentorship productive.

Sponsorship: Going Beyond Advice

While mentorship offers guidance, sponsorship actively opens doors. Sponsors:

• Nominate junior surgeons for high-visibility committees, talks, and awards.
• Recommend them for key cases and leadership roles.
• Advocate for them behind closed doors during promotion and hiring discussions.

Women, particularly those from underrepresented backgrounds, often have less access to sponsorship. Departments that care about diversity and inclusion deliberately build:

• Formal sponsorship programs pairing senior leaders with high-potential surgeons.
• Transparent nomination processes for awards and leadership roles.

Advocacy, Policy Change, and Institutional Culture

Organizations such as the American College of Surgeons, Association of Women Surgeons, and specialty societies have launched initiatives to improve:

• Diversity and inclusion in recruitment, including holistic review and bias training for selection committees.
• Equity in pay and promotion, using salary audits and standardized promotion criteria.
• Leadership development programs tailored to women and other underrepresented groups.

Within hospitals and academic centers, concrete actions that make a difference include:

• Creating Women in Surgery interest groups or sections.
• Hosting grand rounds on gender equity, professionalism, and inclusive leadership.
• Collecting department-level data on gender representation in faculty ranks, awards, and invited talks.

These steps move the conversation from “we value diversity” to measurable progress.

---

The Future of Women in Surgery: Trends, Opportunities, and Responsibilities

Demographic and Cultural Shifts

In many countries, women now make up 50% or more of medical students, and their presence in surgical residencies continues to grow. This changes both the culture and expectations of the field:

• Increased visibility of women in all surgical subspecialties—general surgery, neurosurgery, cardiothoracic, vascular, orthopedics, and beyond.
• More diverse leadership pipelines, with growing numbers of women serving as program directors, division chiefs, and department chairs.
• Broader definitions of success, expanding beyond sheer case volume to include teaching excellence, research innovation, quality improvement, and advocacy.

Programs that ignore these shifts may struggle to recruit top talent, while those that embrace gender equity will attract highly motivated, diverse applicants.

Research, Innovation, and the Impact of Diversity

Women surgeons are making major contributions in:

• Minimally invasive and robotic surgery, leading trials and innovating new techniques.
• Quality improvement and patient-safety initiatives, where diverse teams have been shown to enhance problem-solving and outcomes.
• Health equity research, examining how patient and provider gender, race, and socioeconomic status intersect to influence surgical care.

Evidence increasingly shows that diverse surgical teams improve patient care, including better communication, reduced complications, and more comprehensive decision-making. Promoting women in surgery is not just an ethical imperative; it is a strategy for clinical excellence.

Evolving Medical Education and Professional Ethics

Medical schools and residency programs are incorporating:

• Curricula on implicit bias, structural racism, and gender equity, helping future surgeons recognize how systems shape both patient care and professional trajectories.
• Case discussions on professionalism and harassment, including strategies for bystander intervention and reporting.
• Workshops on negotiation skills, career planning, and wellness, acknowledging that sustainable surgical careers require intentional design.

For learners, this means you are entering a profession that is actively questioning its old norms. You have both the opportunity and responsibility to:

• Speak up when you witness bias or exclusion.
• Support peers who are experiencing harassment or discrimination.
• Join or create initiatives that promote gender equity, diversity, and inclusion in your department.

---

Practical Advice for Aspiring Women Surgeons

For medical students and residents considering surgical careers, the path can be both demanding and extraordinarily rewarding. Concrete steps to help you thrive include:

1. Explore Early and Honestly

• Rotate through multiple surgical specialties. Pay attention not just to the cases, but to team culture, leadership styles, and the presence (or absence) of women and diverse surgeons.
• Ask current women residents and faculty candid questions about:
  • Call schedules and flexibility
  • Support for pregnancy and parenting
  • Culture around feedback and teaching
  • Incidents of bias or discrimination and how they are handled

2. Build a Support Network

• Find mentors at different career stages—a senior faculty member, a mid-career surgeon, and a resident close to your level.
• Join organizations such as:
  • Association of Women Surgeons (AWS)
  • Women’s sections in your specialty society
  • Local or institutional Women in Surgery groups
• Connect with peers; informal “mentorship circles” or study groups can be powerful sources of support.

3. Be Strategic About Your Career Development

• Start building your CV early: research projects, quality improvement initiatives, leadership roles, and teaching experiences.
• Learn negotiation skills for contracts, start-up packages, and protected time—crucial for preventing long-term pay gaps and burnout.
• Document your achievements and feedback systematically; this becomes key material for promotion and awards.

4. Protect Your Well-Being and Values

• Recognize that burnout is a system problem, not a personal failure. Seek help early if you feel overwhelmed.
• Prioritize basic self-care: sleep, nutrition, and personal relationships are not luxuries; they are prerequisites for safe surgical practice.
• Clarify your own values: What matters most to you—teaching, research, clinical excellence, family, advocacy? Use those values to guide your decisions, rather than trying to meet others’ expectations.

---

Frequently Asked Questions About Women in Surgery

1. What are the most common barriers women face in surgical careers today?
Women in surgery frequently encounter a combination of systemic and interpersonal challenges, including gender bias in evaluation and promotion, pay inequity, limited access to high-visibility opportunities, microaggressions from colleagues and patients, and structural barriers around pregnancy and parenting. These issues can slow career progression and contribute to burnout if not addressed at the institutional level.

2. How can medical mentorship specifically support women in surgery?
Effective medical mentorship helps women in surgery by providing:

• Honest insight into specialty cultures and career paths
• Guidance on research, fellowship applications, and leadership roles
• Strategies to respond to discrimination or bias
• Emotional support and normalization of challenges

Formal mentorship programs—such as those from the Association of Women Surgeons, ACS Women in Surgery Committees, and specialty societies—can connect students and residents with mentors outside their home institution, broadening their network and opportunities.

3. What can surgical departments do to promote gender equity and inclusion?
Departments serious about gender equity and diversity and inclusion can:

• Conduct pay and promotion audits and address identified gaps
• Establish transparent promotion criteria and selection processes for leadership roles
• Create family-friendly policies (standard parental leave, flexible scheduling, childcare support)
• Offer bias training and clear, confidential reporting pathways for discrimination or harassment
• Support Women in Surgery groups and sponsor women for key committees, talks, and awards

Measuring progress annually and sharing data with faculty and trainees reinforces accountability.

4. How can women surgeons approach work–life balance or integration realistically?
Work–life balance in surgery is less about perfect equilibrium and more about intentional integration. Strategies include:

• Choosing programs and jobs with policies that align with your needs (e.g., parental leave, flexible call, part-time options).
• Setting boundaries around non-urgent work tasks when off duty.
• Sharing domestic responsibilities with partners or family and outsourcing when possible.
• Periodically reassessing your schedule and commitments as life circumstances change.

It is entirely possible to have a fulfilling surgical career and a meaningful personal life, but it requires planning, negotiation, and supportive institutional structures.

5. Why does representation of women in surgery matter for patients and the profession?
Representation matters because:

• Diverse teams are associated with better problem-solving, innovation, and patient outcomes.
• Patients often feel more comfortable and better understood when they see clinicians who reflect their own identities and experiences.
• Visible women leaders challenge outdated stereotypes, making it easier for future generations to enter and transform the field.

Promoting women in surgery is not only about fairness; it is a core component of building a high-performing, patient-centered, and ethical surgical workforce.

---

Women in surgery have transformed the profession from the margins to the mainstream, proving that excellence, leadership, and innovation know no gender. As institutions continue to embrace gender equity, medical mentorship, and diversity and inclusion, the next generation of surgeons—women and men alike—will inherit a field that is more just, more humane, and ultimately better for patients.