Married to a Non-Physician? How to Pick States That Work for Both Careers

The worst career mistake physician couples make is picking states based only on residency lists and ignoring the spouse’s job market.

If you’re married to a non-physician and you’re choosing where to train or practice, you’re not picking a program. You’re picking a regional labor market for two careers. Treat it that way or you’ll both pay for it in stress, distance, or wasted years.

This is how you actually pick states that work for both of you.

---

Step 1: Admit you’re not choosing a city. You’re choosing a metro region.

Most people say “I want to be in California” or “We don’t want the Midwest.” That’s useless. Careers don’t happen in states; they happen in metro areas and industry clusters.

You need to think like this instead:

• “We need driving access to at least three hospitals and a strong tech market.”
• “We need a finance hub plus a large academic medical center.”
• “We need a place where elementary education jobs are plentiful and hospital jobs aren’t saturated.”

States that look terrible for your spouse on paper can be fantastic if there’s one strong metro with their industry.

State	Metro	Doctor Market	Non-Physician Market
Texas	Houston	Excellent	Strong (energy, healthcare, aerospace)
Texas	Lubbock	Solid	Weak outside local industries
New York	NYC	Very strong	Top tier (finance, media, tech)
New York	Upstate	Variable	Often limited, public sector heavy
North Carolina	RTP Area	Strong	Strong (tech, pharma, research)

So the first mental reset:

You’re not asking “Which state is good for us?”
You’re asking “Which metro areas give us both realistic job options within commutable distance?”

---

Step 2: Map your spouse’s career reality, not the fantasy version

Most physicians know exactly how competitive their specialty is. But they’ll wave away the spouse’s job with: “Oh, you can work anywhere, right?”

That’s how you get resentment.

You need a brutally honest snapshot of your spouse’s career:

• What is their actual field? (Not just “business” or “education.” Be specific.)
• What is their current level? Entry, mid, senior, manager, director?
• Do they need licensing or state-specific certification?
• How geographically flexible is that profession in reality?

Examples:

• Public school teacher – Needs state certification. Some states accept reciprocity easily. Others make it a pain. Rural areas may have openings; “desirable” suburbs may be fully staffed.
• Attorney – State bar. Moving states can mean retaking the bar or being limited in practice type.
• Engineer in oil & gas – Great in Houston, Midland/Odessa, parts of Colorado. Rough in New England.
• Remote software developer – Better, but “remote” is shrinking in many sectors. Some companies want you in specific time zones.
• Academic researcher – Needs universities or major research hospitals; not happening in every mid-sized city.

You and your spouse should sit down and list:

1. 3–5 industries that commonly hire people with their skill set
2. “Must haves” vs “nice to haves” (Is remote okay? Do they need on-site labs? A manufacturing plant? A courthouse?)
3. Salary floor they cannot drop below (be realistic, not ideal)

Write it down. No hand-waving.

---

Step 3: Understand where your specialty can flex — and where it can’t

Now do the same thing for your own career, but with more nuance than “I’m competitive, I’ll go where I want.”

Key questions:

• Are you applying for residency, fellowship, or attending jobs?
• Are you in a highly location-flexible specialty (IM, FM, peds, psych, anesthesia, EM in many regions) or geographically constrained (derm, plastics, ENT, rad onc, highly competitive fellowships)?
• Can you accept community programs in less “sexy” locations, or are you locked onto a specific tier of academic programs?

For example:

• A categorical IM applicant can probably find decent programs in dozens of metros.
• A neurosurgery applicant with average stats has a much tighter map.
• A radiology attending post-fellowship can often pick from multiple states; a pediatric neurosurgery applicant? Very different.

Here’s the harsh truth:
If you’re in a hyper-competitive specialty with borderline stats, your flexibility is probably worse than your spouse’s. That limits how picky you can be geographically, and you both need to face that directly.

---

Step 4: Build a short list of “two-career metros,” not dream cities

Now you combine the two. Do this on a whiteboard or spreadsheet. I’ve watched couples do it; the difference in clarity is night and day.

Step-by-step:

1. List 10–15 U.S. metro areas that:

   • Have at least 2–3 hospitals that train your specialty (if residency/fellowship)
   • Or 3–5 hospitals in your field (if attending)
   • AND obvious employers for your spouse’s field

2. Next to each metro, mark:

   • Number of relevant hospitals
   • Number of obvious spouse employers (by name, not “I’m sure something exists”)

3. Star the metros where:

   • You have real program matches, not fantasy ones
   • Your spouse can see at least 3 realistic employers, not just “maybe a startup”

Example of how this looks in practice:

• Houston – MD: Multiple IM/EM/anesthesia programs (UT, Baylor, HCA). Spouse: Oil & gas, aerospace, huge hospital systems.
• Raleigh-Durham (RTP) – MD: Duke, UNC, WakeMed. Spouse: Tech, biotech, pharma, research.
• Denver – MD: University, community systems. Spouse: Growing tech, energy, tourism/corporate.
• Pittsburgh – MD: UPMC footprint. Spouse: Healthcare, education, some tech, corporate.

Now, reality check:

Some of the traditionally "top doctor cities" are awful for certain spouses:

• Great for doctors, rough for spouses:

  • Rochester, MN – Fantastic for Mayo, limited beyond healthcare.
  • Many small academic towns – One university, one hospital system, that’s it.

• Great for dual-career couples if your spouse is in knowledge work:

  • Boston, NYC, Bay Area, DC, Seattle, Austin – Expensive, yes. But deep job markets.

Dual-Career Depth in Selected Metros

Category	Value
Houston	9
Boston	10
Raleigh-Durham	8
Rochester MN	3
Mid-size Midwest	4

(Think of those numbers as “relative depth of two-career options,” not scientific scores.)

---

Step 5: Segment states into tiers for your situation

You don’t need a national ranking. You need a map that makes sense for your marriage.

Create three buckets:

• Green states/regions – Multiple metros where you both have strong options
• Yellow – Possible, but one of you will compromise (pay, role, commute, or prestige)
• Red – One of you will almost certainly stall or resent the choice

Rough examples for common spouse careers:

If your spouse is in tech or remote-friendly knowledge work

• Green regions:
  • California (SF Bay Area, LA, San Diego – tech + major health systems)
  • Washington (Seattle)
  • Texas (Austin, Dallas, Houston)
  • Massachusetts (Boston)
  • North Carolina (Raleigh-Durham/Charlotte)
  • Colorado (Denver/Boulder)
• Yellow:
  • Georgia (Atlanta)
  • Illinois (Chicago)
  • Virginia/DC area
• Red:
  • Many rural-heavy states with one small metro: the “one city + farmland” states, unless that one city is genuinely booming

If your spouse is a K–12 teacher, nurse, or allied health

• Green regions:
  • States with population growth and large suburban belts: Texas, North Carolina, Georgia, Colorado, Arizona, Florida (with caveats), Tennessee
• Yellow:
  • States with stagnant or shrinking populations but strong cities: Pennsylvania, Ohio, Missouri (St. Louis/KC), Michigan (Ann Arbor/Grand Rapids pockets)
• Red:
  • High cost, hiring freezes, or oversaturated suburb districts. Parts of California, New York suburbs, some New England states

If your spouse is law/finance/policy

• Green:
  • New York (NYC), DC/Maryland/Virginia, Illinois (Chicago), Massachusetts (Boston), California (SF/LA), Texas (Houston/Dallas)
• Yellow:
  • North Carolina (Charlotte/triangle), Georgia (Atlanta), Colorado (Denver)
• Red:
  • States without major corporate/financial centers or where courts/firm markets are tiny

You adjust this list for your exact situation. Point is: stop pretending every state is on the table. It’s not.

---

Step 6: For residency/fellowship – decide how much you’re willing to sacrifice temporarily

Training years are weird. You’re overworked, underpaid, and geographically stuck. That makes the spouse’s career risk worse.

You both have to answer:

• Is your spouse OK:
  • Not working for 1–3 years?
  • Stepping down in level or pay temporarily?
  • Doing something adjacent to their field instead of core work?
  • Going back to school or retraining?

If the answer is no to all three, then training locations need to be filtered much more aggressively.

Here’s the framework residents I’ve worked with use:

• If training is 3 years or less (IM, peds, FM, general psych):
  • You can justify more sacrifice for the spouse if there’s a strong post-residency plan in a better metro.
• If training is 5–7 years (surgery, neurosurg, ortho, ENT, some fellowships chained):
  • You cannot reasonably ask your spouse to stall for that long. That’s most of their 30s or 40s.

That’s why some of the “Top Name” programs in small towns are actually bad life decisions for dual-career couples, even if they’re career gold for the physician.

---

Step 7: Factor in cost of living and lifestyle in a cold, numerical way

People romanticize coasts and big names. Then they get there and can’t afford child care or a decent apartment, and the spouse’s salary vanishes into rent.

Use hard numbers:

• Your projected PGY salary (realistic with taxes)
• Spouse’s realistic salary range in each metro
• Median rent for a 1–2 bedroom within 30–40 minutes of hospitals
• Childcare if you have or want kids

Resident Couple Net Income After Basic Expenses

Category	Combined Take-home	Rent+Childcare+Loans
Houston	9000	4500
Boston	10500	8000
Denver	9500	6000
NYC	11000	9000

That stacked bar tells the story: a “prestige” coastal metro might technically offer two jobs, but between rent and childcare you might feel poorer and more trapped than you would in a cheaper state where your spouse easily finds work.

Sometimes the best state for both careers is the one with less glamour and more margin.

---

Step 8: Understand licensure, reciprocity, and exit strategy

If your spouse needs any licensure/certification, you should be thinking two steps ahead:

• If they get certified or licensed in State A, how easy is it to transfer to State B in 3–7 years?
• Are there compacts or reciprocity agreements? (e.g., Nurse Licensure Compact states)
• Are there postgraduate programs or continuing ed requirements that only some states recognize?

For you:

• Are you comfortable doing residency in a state where you would never stay long term?
• If you complete residency there, where do their grads actually match for fellowship or jobs?

That last one is huge. I’ve watched people pick programs in states where:

• 80–90% of grads stay in-state
• Or their letters/connections don’t travel well to the coasts

If your long-term goal is, say, Pacific Northwest or East Coast, do not train in a region whose grads overwhelmingly practice locally unless:

• You’re fine living there permanently, or
• You’re exceptional and know the exit routes

---

Step 9: Use this when making your actual rank list or job list

Here’s how you turn this theory into concrete ranking behavior.

For residency/fellowship:

1. Group programs by metro first, not by prestige.
2. Within each metro, sort programs into:
   • “Career + Spouse both strong”
   • “Career strong, spouse acceptable”
   • “Career strong, spouse weak”
3. Only rank programs where “spouse weak” is on the table if:
   • Training duration is short, and
   • You’ve both explicitly agreed the sacrifice is worth it

For attending jobs:

1. Identify 3–5 target metros where both of you can win.
2. Within those metros, apply aggressively to all reasonable roles, even if not your “dream” job yet.
3. Do not accept a job in a metro where your spouse has no realistic path unless you’re prepared for a commuter marriage or deep resentment.

---

Step 10: Have the blunt conversation you’re probably avoiding

This whole process fails if you and your spouse are lying to each other to be “supportive.”

You need to say things out loud like:

• “If I go into this subspecialty, we will probably have to move to the Midwest or South for several years.”
• “If we insist on staying on the coasts, my match odds drop and I may need to accept a less competitive specialty or program.”
• “If we move to this state, you’ll likely need to change industries or accept a lower-level role. Are you actually OK with that?”

It’s much easier to handle this before you match into a 7-year program in a one-hospital town.

---

A few states and regions that routinely work well for dual-career physician couples

This is not exhaustive, but if you want a starting point, these repeatedly show up as solid for both doctors and non-physician spouses (assuming common careers like tech, education, healthcare, law, corporate, research):

• Texas – Houston, Dallas, Austin, San Antonio. Big physician job market, diverse industries, lower cost of living than coasts.
• North Carolina – Raleigh-Durham (RTP), Charlotte. Strong for medicine, tech, banking, education.
• Colorado – Denver/Boulder. Growing tech and healthcare. Lifestyle tradeoffs but good two-career market.
• Massachusetts – Boston area. Brutal COL, but deep academic medicine + biotech + finance + tech.
• Washington – Seattle. Tech and major health systems.
• Georgia – Atlanta. Big healthcare, corporate, and tech presence.
• Minnesota – Twin Cities (different story than Rochester). Health systems, corporate HQs, decent schools, decent dual-career depth.

Two-Career State Decision Flow

Step	Description
Step 1	Start
Step 2	Map spouse career needs
Step 3	Map your specialty options
Step 4	Identify candidate metros
Step 5	Green region - prioritize
Step 6	Yellow or Red - reconsider
Step 7	Build rank/job list
Step 8	Discuss sacrifices and timeline
Step 9	Finalize choices
Step 10	Both have 3+ realistic options?

---

Final thoughts

You’re not just choosing where you’ll practice. You’re choosing whether one of you quietly gives up years of career progress.

Anchor on these:

• Think in metros and industries, not “states” and vague vibes.
• Be brutally specific about both careers: actual employers, real salary bands, licensing limits.
• Use training years strategically, but don’t hide from the long-term math—especially for 5–7 year paths.

If you get those three things right, you stop feeling like you’re gambling your marriage on a rank list or a job offer. You’re making an adult, joint decision about two careers, on one map.