Building a Strong Research Profile as a Non-US IMG for Med-Psych Residency

Why Research Matters So Much for a Non-US Citizen IMG in Med-Psych

As a non-US citizen IMG aiming for a medicine-psychiatry combined program, your research profile is not just a nice bonus—it is often a critical differentiator. Med-psych residency programs tend to be smaller, academically oriented, and highly selective. Program directors expect applicants to show genuine intellectual curiosity, comfort with complexity, and an ability to integrate internal medicine and psychiatry perspectives. A thoughtful research portfolio signals all of that.

For a foreign national medical graduate, research offers several additional advantages:

• Compensates for systemic barriers: Visa limitations, unfamiliarity with the US system, and bias can make your path harder. Strong research makes your file hard to ignore.
• Creates “US-based evidence” of excellence: US research experience, particularly with US mentors, reassures program directors about your ability to function in American academic medicine.
• Helps you stand out in a small field: Med-psych residency (medicine psychiatry combined) is niche; being “the applicant with a clear research identity” is powerful.
• Builds a narrative of integration: Med-psych values holistic thinking. Research that bridges internal medicine and psychiatry clearly aligns you with the specialty’s core mission.

If you are wondering about how many publications needed, there is no magic number. One focused, high-quality project with meaningful involvement and strong letters often outweighs several superficial, low-impact listings. For a non-US citizen IMG, the real question is: How can I build a research profile that proves I will contribute academically and clinically to this combined field?

This article will walk you through a stepwise, realistic strategy to build that profile—from wherever you are starting—using examples and concrete action plans tailored to non-US citizen IMGs interested in med-psych.

---

Understanding What Counts as Research for Med-Psych Applications

Before you start chasing “publications for match,” you need to understand what actually counts as research in the eyes of residency programs, and which types best fit medicine-psychiatry combined training.

Formal vs. Broad Definitions of Research

Most program directors look at research broadly. Activities that usually count include:

• Original research projects
  • Prospective or retrospective clinical studies
  • Chart reviews
  • Case–control, cohort, or cross-sectional studies
  • Quality improvement (QI) that uses proper methods
• Scholarly work
  • Case reports and case series
  • Narrative or systematic reviews
  • Book chapters
  • Educational research (curriculum, teaching innovations)
• Academic dissemination
  • Posters and oral presentations at conferences
  • Published abstracts
  • Online peer-reviewed content (e.g., platforms that review submissions)

Program directors often look at effort + depth + relevance, not just final publication count.

Research Types That Fit Medicine-Psychiatry Combined Training

The strongest research profiles for med-psych residency applicants demonstrate some alignment with integrated medicine and psychiatry. Examples:

• Consultation-liaison psychiatry research

  • Psychiatric complications of chronic medical illness
  • Delirium in hospitalized patients
  • Somatic symptom and related disorders
  • Management of depression in patients with heart failure or diabetes

• Neuropsychiatry and brain–body interfaces

  • Cognitive impairment in chronic kidney disease
  • Stroke and post-stroke depression
  • Traumatic brain injury and behavioral changes

• Addiction and comorbid medical conditions

  • Substance use and liver disease
  • Opioid use in chronic pain patients
  • Managing alcohol withdrawal on hospital medicine services

• Psychiatric aspects of primary care and chronic disease

  • Anxiety and adherence to hypertension treatment
  • Depression in patients with diabetes or HIV
  • Collaborative care models for mental health in primary care

• Health services research

  • How integrated care clinics affect outcomes
  • Barriers to mental health care in general medical settings
  • Telepsychiatry within primary care or inpatient units

If you cannot access med-psych–specific projects, that’s fine. Work in either internal medicine or psychiatry still helps—just be ready to explain, in your personal statement and interviews, how your research relates to integrated care.

---

How Many Publications Do You Really Need? (And What Kind?)

Many non-US citizen IMGs obsess over how many publications needed to match in competitive pathways. The honest answer: it depends on the total application—scores, USCE, letters, and personal narrative. But we can outline some realistic benchmarks.

Publications vs. Overall Scholarly Profile

Program directors often think in terms of overall scholarly engagement, not just publication count. They ask:

• Did this applicant stick with a research project long enough to complete it?
• Did they show increasing responsibility (from data entry to design to first-author work)?
• Are there US-based experiences or mentors who can vouch for them?
• Is there a coherent theme in their work that fits med-psych?

A practical framework for a foreign national medical graduate targeting medicine-psychiatry combined programs:

• Minimal but acceptable scholarly footprint

  • 1–2 case reports or small projects
  • 1 or 2 posters or oral presentations
  • Clear description of your role and reflections in your CV and PS
  • Common for applicants from resource-limited schools

• Moderately strong research profile (very realistic target)

  • 2–4 total publications (including case reports, original papers, or reviews)
  • A mix of medicine-focused, psychiatry-focused, or integrated topics
  • At least one US-based research or scholarly activity (poster, abstract, or paper)
  • A strong letter from a research mentor

• Exceptionally strong profile (not required, but powerful)

  • 5+ total publications, with some first- or second-author roles
  • Involvement in research that clearly bridges internal medicine and psychiatry
  • Presentations at national or regional US meetings
  • Evidence you led or co-led parts of projects

For most non-US citizen IMGs, quality and narrative fit are more important than hitting a specific number. A single substantial med-psych–relevant project (for example, a study of depression and diabetes outcomes) with a meaningful role and a good letter is often more impactful than three case reports unrelated to your career goals.

Weighing Different Types of Output

From a med-psych program director’s perspective, the hierarchy (very roughly) often looks like:

1. Original research articles (especially clinical or health services)
2. Systematic/narrative reviews, book chapters, well-structured QI with outcomes
3. Case reports/series, brief communications
4. Posters and abstracts at credible conferences
5. Non–peer-reviewed pieces (blogs, educational handouts, etc.)—useful, but not as strong alone

That said, any starting point is fine as long as you keep developing. Many non-US citizen IMGs reasonably progress over a few years from:

Data entry → case report → poster → co-author paper.

Your goal is to show trajectory.

---

Stepwise Strategy to Build a Med-Psych–Relevant Research Profile

Whether you are still in medical school or years after graduation, you can build a credible research record. The key is to be strategic and resourceful.

Step 1: Clarify Your Med-Psych Research Identity

Before looking for projects, outline:

• Your core interests
  Examples:

  • Depression and cardiovascular disease
  • Addiction in patients with chronic pain
  • Delirium in hospitalized older adults
  • Mental health in chronic kidney disease or transplant patients

• Your current strengths

  • Clinical experience with certain patient groups
  • Comfort with statistics or literature review
  • Language skills (helpful for global mental health projects)

• Your practical constraints

  • Location and time zone
  • Visa status and ability to travel
  • Access to patients, data, and mentors

Write a short “research pitch” for yourself (2–3 sentences). For example:

“I am a non-US citizen IMG interested in medicine-psychiatry combined training. My focus is on depression and adherence in patients with chronic medical illness, especially diabetes and hypertension. I hope to contribute to integrated care models in underserved populations.”

This will help you approach mentors with a clear, memorable message.

Step 2: Find Mentors and Projects (Both at Home and in the US)

At Your Home Institution

Even if your school has limited formal research infrastructure, look for:

• Faculty in internal medicine or psychiatry who occasionally publish
• Departments that keep patient registries or quality data
• Residents or fellows who have ongoing audits, QI, or small cohort studies

Possible starting projects:

• A case series of medically hospitalized patients with depression or delirium
• A chart review of psychiatric consultations on internal medicine wards
• A survey of attitudes toward mental health among chronic disease patients

Offer concrete help: data extraction, literature search, drafting introductions.

In the US (Remote or In-Person)

As a foreign national medical graduate, the best doors often open through:

• Electives or observerships in US institutions
• Cold emails to faculty with overlapping interests
• Networking at conferences (even virtual ones)

To maximize success with cold emails:

1. Target the right people

   • Med-psych program faculty
   • Consultation-liaison psychiatrists
   • Internists with an interest in behavioral health
   • Health services researchers in integrated care

2. Write a concise email (150–200 words):

   • Introduce your background as a non-US citizen IMG
   • State your med-psych interest and prior experience
   • Attach your CV
   • Ask if there are ongoing projects where you can help remotely

3. Offer something valuable

   • Literature review skills
   • Data cleaning/entry using Excel or basic stats software
   • Translation and cross-cultural insights for global projects

You will get rejections or no responses. That is normal. Persistence and a clear interest in medicine psychiatry combined topics will eventually resonate with someone.

Step 3: Choose Projects You Can Actually Complete

The biggest mistake many IMGs make is joining projects that:

• Depend heavily on patient recruitment in the US when they are remote
• Are overly ambitious (multi-year RCTs, large multi-center studies)
• Have unclear leadership or timelines

For a non-US citizen IMG abroad, high-yield, realistic project types include:

• Chart reviews using existing data
• Secondary analyses of existing datasets
• Case reports/series based on interesting integrated med-psych cases
• Narrative or scoping reviews on topics like:
  • Depression in uncontrolled diabetes
  • Substance use and liver disease
  • Integrated care models for severe mental illness

When you propose ideas, make them manageable:

“Given the access I have to X hospital’s internal medicine ward, I wonder if we could do a retrospective chart review of rates of documented depression among patients admitted with CHF and associations with readmission rates.”

Concrete, focused proposals are more likely to get a mentor’s support.

Step 4: Build Skills That Make You Useful (Even from Abroad)

To become a valuable research collaborator, invest in:

• Basic epidemiology and biostatistics

  • Complete free online courses (Coursera, edX, etc.)
  • Learn about odds ratios, confidence intervals, regression basics

• Software skills

  • Data organization in Excel or Google Sheets
  • Intro-level SPSS, R, or Stata (even at a basic level makes you attractive as a collaborator)
  • Reference managers (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote)

• Academic writing

  • Read 1–2 med-psych–relevant articles weekly
  • Practice summarizing studies in one paragraph
  • Study how introductions and discussion sections are structured

The more competent you are, the more responsibility mentors will give you—leading to co-authorship or first-authorship.

Step 5: Turn Each Project into Multiple Outputs

From one solid project, you might derive:

• A poster at your local or national conference
• A poster or abstract at a US psychiatric or medicine meeting (e.g., APA, ACP, ACLP)
• A full manuscript submission
• A short commentary or letter to the editor on related topics

Example:

You work on a chart review of “Depression and hospital readmissions in patients with heart failure.” The timeline might look like:

• Month 1–2: IRB/ethics, protocol, data extraction form
• Month 3–4: Data collection and preliminary analysis
• Month 5: Abstract submission to a regional conference
• Month 6–9: Full paper drafting and journal submission

Even if the paper takes long to publish, the accepted poster and “manuscript in preparation/submitted” can already be listed in your application (accurately labeled).

---

Presenting Your Research Effectively in the Residency Application

Doing the research is only half the battle. You must also present it in a way that clearly supports your med-psych ambitions.

CV and ERAS Entries

When listing research on ERAS:

• Use accurate authorship order and status:
  • Submitted, accepted, in press, or published
  • Do not exaggerate or misrepresent
• Give descriptive titles that highlight integrated themes when appropriate:
  • Instead of: “Depression in diabetes”
  • Use: “Impact of depressive symptoms on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes attending primary care clinics”

In the Experience section for research roles:

• Specify your responsibilities:
  • “Performed literature review, helped develop data collection instrument, extracted data from 150 charts, conducted basic statistical analysis in SPSS, and co-wrote methods/results sections.”
• Clarify collaboration:
  • “Worked remotely with US-based med-psych faculty at X institution under Y visa constraints.”

Personal Statement: Connecting Research to Your Med-Psych Story

Your research should support a coherent career narrative:

• Describe how your projects shaped your understanding of:
  • The interaction of physical and mental health
  • Barriers to integrated care
  • Vulnerable, high-need patient populations

Example integration:

“While working on a retrospective study of depression and hospital readmissions in patients with heart failure, I repeatedly saw how untreated depressive symptoms led to missed appointments and medication non-adherence. This experience crystallized my interest in medicine-psychiatry combined training, where I can address both pathophysiology and psychosocial determinants of health.”

Even if your research is mainly in just medicine or just psychiatry, highlight the med-psych implications.

Letters of Recommendation

For research-heavy applications, it is extremely valuable to have at least one letter from a research mentor, ideally from the US. To maximize this:

• Keep your mentor updated on progress and your future goals
• Share your CV and personal statement draft
• Specifically mention that you are applying to medicine psychiatry combined programs
• Ask if they can comment on:
  • Your intellectual curiosity
  • Independence and reliability
  • Ability to integrate clinical and research insights

A mentor who says, “This applicant was central to our project on integrating mental health screening into primary care,” gives program directors strong reasons to remember you.

Interview Preparation: Talking About Your Work

Expect med-psych interviewers to ask:

• “Tell me about your research.”
• “How does this project relate to your interest in combined training?”
• “What was the hardest part of the study?”
• “If you continued this work in residency, what would be the next step?”

Prepare:

• A 2–3 minute summary of each major project (background, methods, key findings, why it matters for integrated care).
• Honest reflections on limitations and what you learned (e.g., IRB challenges, recruitment difficulties).
• Ideas on how you would build on this in a med-psych residency (e.g., expanding a pilot into a QI initiative on your inpatient service).

---

Practical Timelines and Strategies for Different Starting Points

Your strategy depends heavily on where you are in your trajectory as a non-US citizen IMG.

If You Are Still in Medical School

Goal: Build a foundation of research skills and at least 1–2 outputs.

• Years 3–4:

  • Join any available research group (medicine, psychiatry, public health).
  • Aim for one case report and one small project (audit, chart review, or survey).
  • Present at any local or national meeting possible.
  • Start remotely networking with US faculty in med-psych fields.

• Final year:

  • Try to secure a US elective or observership with an academic component.
  • Ask to join a project even if your role is modest.
  • Solidify one or two mentors for future letters.

If You Are 1–3 Years After Graduation

Goal: Build a credible and visible med-psych research footprint.

• Year 1:

  • Identify at least one mentor at home and, if possible, one in the US.
  • Work on 1–2 focused, accomplishable projects.
  • Target at least one poster and one submitted manuscript.

• Year 2:

  • Deepen your involvement in at least one med-psych–relevant area.
  • Aim for first- or second-author roles.
  • Seek US-based presentations (virtual if needed).

• Year 3 (if reapplying or still preparing):

  • Consolidate your outputs.
  • Shift from being “extra hands” on projects to helping design or coordinate small studies or QI initiatives.

If You Have No Research Experience Yet

Start small and specific:

1. Take an online research methods course (4–8 weeks).
2. Identify one patient case that fits med-psych and write a case report with a local mentor.
3. Email potential US mentors highlighting:
   • Your new skills
   • Your willingness to work on literature reviews or data tasks
4. Aim for:
   • 1 case report
   • 1 poster
   • 1 small collaborative project (e.g., narrative review)

The most important part is to begin and then build consistency.

---

FAQs: Research for Non-US Citizen IMGs Targeting Medicine-Psychiatry

1. As a non-US citizen IMG, is research mandatory to match into med-psych residency?
Not strictly mandatory, but highly advantageous. Medicine-psychiatry combined programs are academically inclined and relatively small. A solid research or scholarly profile, even if modest, can significantly improve your competitiveness and helps compensate for visa-related and systemic disadvantages. At minimum, aim to demonstrate genuine scholarly engagement—case reports, quality improvement, or small projects.

2. How many publications do I need to be competitive for med-psych programs?
There is no fixed number. For many non-US citizen IMGs, a realistic and strong profile might include 2–4 total publications (cases, reviews, or original studies) and a few posters or presentations. What matters more is: Are they relevant? Did you play a genuine role? Do they fit a coherent med-psych narrative? One substantial, meaningful project with a strong letter is better than multiple superficial listings.

3. Does my research have to be specifically in medicine-psychiatry combined topics?
Not necessarily. Research in either internal medicine or psychiatry is still valued. However, if you can choose or shape projects, aim for themes at the medical–psychiatric interface (e.g., depression in chronic disease, delirium in medical inpatients, substance use and liver disease). Even if the topic is more general, you can highlight the med-psych implications in your personal statement and interviews.

4. I live outside the US and have limited access to research infrastructure. What can I realistically do?
You can still build a credible profile. Focus on:

• Case reports and case series based on interesting med-psych cases
• Retrospective chart reviews or audits using existing hospital data
• Narrative reviews on integrated care topics
• Remote collaboration with US mentors (literature reviews, data cleaning, basic analysis)

Combine this with self-directed learning in research methods and basic statistics, and clearly explain your constraints and achievements in your application.

---

By approaching research strategically—matching your projects to your med-psych interests, building practical skills, and presenting your work thoughtfully—you can transform a challenging starting position as a non-US citizen IMG into a compelling, academically strong application for medicine-psychiatry combined residency.