Residency Advisor Logo Residency Advisor

Can I Get Malpractice Coverage With Prior Claims on My Record?

January 7, 2026
13 minute read

Physician reviewing malpractice insurance documents in office -  for Can I Get Malpractice Coverage With Prior Claims on My R

It’s 10:30 p.m. You just got off call, you’re finally scrolling through that renewal email from your malpractice carrier… and your stomach drops. They’re “non-renewing” you because of “loss history.” Translation: you’ve had claims, and they’re done with you.

Now the panic question: Can I still get malpractice coverage with prior claims on my record? Or am I basically uninsurable?

Here’s the answer you actually need:
Yes, you can get coverage with prior claims. But it’s not automatic, and the way you approach it will determine whether you land a decent policy or get stuck with something expensive, restrictive, or both.

Let’s walk through it like a real problem, not an abstract insurance lecture.


1. The Short Answer: Yes, But It Depends On 4 Things

Carriers don’t care that you’re “a good doctor.” They care about risk. With prior claims, they’re asking four questions:

  1. How many claims?
    One nuisance claim from 5 years ago is very different from 3 paid claims in the last 3 years.

  2. How severe?

    • Dismissed with no payment? Mild concern.
    • Small settlement under $50k? Manageable.
    • Multiple six- or seven-figure indemnity payments? Big problem.
  3. How recent?

    • Last 12–24 months = heavily scrutinized
    • 3–5 years ago = still relevant but less toxic
    • 7–10 years, especially with clean years since = often discounted

  4. What’s your specialty and practice pattern?
    High-risk: OB/GYN, neurosurgery, orthopedics, EM, anesthesia, certain interventional fields
    Lower-risk: psychiatry, pediatrics (usually), family med without OB, derm, pathology

If your record is:

  • 1–2 older, small, or defensible claims → You’re usually insurable with standard carriers, maybe at a surcharge.
  • Several recent, paid, or severe claims → You’re often pushed to E&S (excess and surplus) markets or specialty “hard-to-place” carriers.

So yes, coverage is possible. The real question is: where and on what terms?


2. What Insurers Actually Look At (Beyond “Do You Have Claims?”)

Insurers don’t look at just one line that says “Yes, prior claims.” They look at a lot more detail than you think.

Here’s what they’re evaluating:

  • Frequency vs severity

    • Many small “friction” claims → suggests communication/expectation issues, documentation problems, or practice style patterns.
    • Few but catastrophic → suggests rare but high-consequence events, maybe systems issues.
  • Your role in each case
    Primary surgeon vs consultant vs covering doc.
    If you were just covering in the ED and got named along with 7 others, that’s very different from being the primary on three high-severity cases.

  • Outcome and payment

    • Dismissed before discovery: often treated as noise.
    • Dismissed after significant defense costs: still a flag, but less than a paid claim.
    • Settlement or verdict against you: big underwriting weight.
  • Time pattern
    Clustered claims (e.g., 3 claims in 2 years from the same hospital) scream systemic problem.
    A single claim 8 years ago followed by nothing? That’s survivable.

  • Practice changes after the events
    This matters more than most doctors realize. Underwriters want to see:

    • Did you change protocols?
    • Did you drop certain high-risk procedures?
    • Did you get additional training or proctoring?
    • Did your group change call schedules, handoff systems, or supervision?

Here’s what that looks like in practice:

How Underwriters View Different Claim Profiles
Profile DescriptionUnderwriter Reaction
1 dismissed claim, 6 years agoUsually acceptable, minor note
2 small paid claims, 4–5 years agoSurcharge, maybe conditions
3+ claims in last 3 years, mixed outcomesHigh risk, E&S or declination
1 large paid claim, recent (last 2 years)Tough but not impossible
Repeat similar adverse events in same areaMajor red flag, often decline

3. Where You Can Actually Get Coverage With Prior Claims

You’ve got roughly three “tiers” of options.

1. Standard admitted carriers (best case)

These are the main medical malpractice insurers in your state. They:

You can sometimes still get into this tier if:

  • Your claims are low frequency, older, or defensible
  • You’re in a lower-risk specialty
  • You present a clean, well-documented story (we’ll talk about this)

You might:

  • Pay a surcharge (10–50%+)
  • Have higher deductibles
  • Have some coverage restrictions for certain procedures

2. Excess & Surplus (E&S) / non-admitted carriers

This is where a lot of physicians with multiple or severe claims end up.

What that means:

  • Policies can be more customized but also more restrictive
  • Rates are usually higher
  • Fewer bells and whistles (risk management, consent-to-settle may be more limited)
  • Less state oversight of rates and forms

Not automatically bad, but you’ve lost some bargaining power. You’re in “you need them more than they need you” territory.

3. Specialty “hard-to-place” programs

These are niche underwriters who focus on:

  • Physicians with serious claims history
  • Physicians coming off board actions or privileges issues
  • High-risk procedures or concierge/high-dollar practices

You’ll often see:

  • Steep premiums
  • Mandatory deductibles or self-insured retentions
  • Strict underwriting guidelines and reporting requirements

bar chart: Standard Carrier, E&S Carrier, Hard-to-Place Program

Relative Likelihood of Placement by Risk Tier
CategoryValue
Standard Carrier60
E&S Carrier30
Hard-to-Place Program10

That chart isn’t precise data; it’s the rough reality: most with prior claims still land in standard carriers, some need E&S, a minority end up in truly hard-to-place pools.


4. How To Present Your Claims History (This Part Is Critical)

This is where many physicians screw it up. They either under-disclose (bad) or overshare messy, emotional narratives (also bad).

You need a tight, factual, professional claims summary for your broker to use with underwriters.

For each claim, include:

  • Date of incident and date filed
  • Patient age & brief clinical context (e.g., “G3P2 at 39 weeks, induction…”)
  • Your role (primary surgeon, consultant, covering hospitalist)
  • Allegations in simple terms (e.g., “delay in diagnosis of appendicitis”)
  • Outcome:
    • Dismissed / defense verdict
    • Settlement amount (if not confidential and you can share generally)
  • Key medical-legal defense points
  • Most important: What changed after the event

Keep it 1 page per case max. Underwriters don’t want your emotional catharsis. They want: what happened, why it’s unlikely to recur.

Bad approach: “The system failed me, the plaintiff attorney was insane, the patient was noncompliant, this was all politics.”

Good approach: “We identified issues in our on-call cross-coverage and closed-loop communication; since then, our group…” etc.

If English isn’t your first language or you’re not a strong writer, have someone help you tighten and clean this up. It matters more than you think.


5. Practical Moves To Improve Your Chances (And Your Rate)

Let me be blunt: you can’t erase claims. But you can make underwriters more comfortable insuring you going forward.

Here’s what actually works:

  1. Use an experienced malpractice broker, not a random agent.
    This is not a DIY project. You want someone who:

    • Places physicians in your specialty regularly
    • Has relationships with both standard and E&S markets
    • Knows which underwriters are open to loss history
  2. Show a real risk-improvement story.
    Underwriters love a “risk management trajectory.” For example:

    • Completion of a recognized risk/communication course
    • Changes in documentation templates and EMR alerts
    • Limiting or eliminating certain high-risk procedures
    • Peer review or external chart review to show improvement
  3. Be flexible on structure.
    Willingness to:

    • Accept a higher deductible
    • Take a per-claim retention
    • Start with restricted coverage that can be broadened after a clean period
  4. Clean house on current practice.
    If you’re still at the same chaotic group where all your claims came from? Underwriters notice. New practice setting, better support, clearer protocols: all positives.

  5. Don’t lie. Ever.
    Failing to disclose a claim is worse than having the claim. Carriers share data. NPDB exists. State boards report. If they catch nondisclosure, you can lose coverage and create a nightmare for future placements.

Mermaid flowchart TD diagram
Malpractice Coverage Path With Prior Claims
StepDescription
Step 1Prior Claims
Step 2Standard Carrier Possible
Step 3Consider E&S Markets
Step 4Prepare Claims Summary
Step 5Better Terms and Premiums
Step 6Higher Cost and Restrictions
Step 7Claims Severity
Step 8Risk Improvements?

6. What Will It Cost Me?

Expect three kinds of “penalties”:

  1. Higher base premium
    Surcharges are sometimes explicit:

    • +10–25% for 1–2 moderate prior claims
    • Larger adjustments case-by-case for multiple or severe losses
  2. Higher deductibles or retentions
    Some carriers will only write you with:

    • $25k–$100k per-claim deductible
    • Or a self-insured retention where you pay the first chunk of loss/defense
  3. Coverage limitations
    You might see:

    • Exclusions on certain procedures (e.g., VBACs, spinal surgeries, certain cosmetic implants)
    • No prior-acts coverage (you keep or buy tail separately)
    • Lower limits than you’d like in tough venues

You’re not necessarily stuck here forever. Many underwriters will soften terms and surcharges after 3–5 clean years.

line chart: Year 0 (Claim Year), Year 1, Year 3, Year 5

Estimated Premium Impact Over Time After Claims
CategoryValue
Year 0 (Claim Year)150
Year 1140
Year 3120
Year 5110

Again, that curve is conceptual, not exact. The point: time + clean practice + good documentation does help.


7. Claims-Made vs Occurrence vs Tail: Extra Landmines If You Have Claims

With prior claims, you need to be extremely careful with policy type and tail.

Key points:

  • Claims-made policies
    Most physician policies are claims-made. Coverage depends on:

    • Policy being active at the time of the incident
    • AND at the time the claim is reported
      That’s why tail coverage (or prior-acts) matters when you switch carriers.
  • Occurrence policies
    Less common and more expensive for physicians. Claim is covered if incident occurred during policy period, no matter when reported. Prior claims don’t disappear, but they’re easier to wall off with a clean new policy.

  • Prior-acts coverage
    Some carriers will pick up your retroactive date (cover your past acts under the new policy). With significant claims history, they may:

    • Refuse to pick up prior acts (require you to buy tail from old carrier), or
    • Charge a big premium to include them.
  • Tail coverage
    If you’re being non-renewed:

    • Get in writing what tail options and costs are.
    • Don’t assume your new carrier will cover your past. Many won’t.

This is where a good broker earns their commission. You do not want gaps.


8. When Coverage Might Be Very Hard (But Not Always Impossible)

There are situations where getting coverage is genuinely difficult:

  • Multiple large paid claims in a short period, same type of allegation
  • Adverse state board actions (especially restrictions on practice)
  • Loss of hospital privileges related to clinical competence
  • Practicing in a high-risk specialty in a “judicial hellhole” venue with bad tort climate

Coverage isn’t necessarily impossible, but:

  • Your options may be very limited
  • Premiums may be punishing
  • You may have to accept a step-down role (fewer procedures, more supervision, academic vs. private practice, etc.) to rebuild credibility

This is also where risk management consultants and sometimes healthcare attorneys get involved to help design a practice structure that a carrier can stomach.


FAQ (Exactly 7 Questions)

1. Can I get malpractice insurance after a paid claim or settlement?
Yes. A paid claim doesn’t automatically make you uninsurable. Underwriters look at how many, how big, how recent, and what changed afterward. One or two reasonable settlements in a long career, especially if older, are usually manageable. Multiple large, recent paid claims are tougher but not necessarily fatal with the right carrier and structure.

2. Are dismissed claims or “nuisance suits” a big problem?
Less than paid claims, but they still count. A single dismissed claim is usually a non-issue. A pattern of many dismissed suits can still bother underwriters because it suggests frequent friction with patients or referral sources, or poor documentation that invites litigation even if you ultimately win.

3. Should I disclose small or old claims if the application doesn’t explicitly ask?
If in doubt, disclose briefly and factually. Most applications ask for all past or pending claims over a certain window (often 5–10 years). Failing to disclose can be treated as misrepresentation and used to deny coverage later. A clean, honest, concise explanation almost always beats hiding things.

4. Will changing specialties help if I have multiple claims?
Sometimes. Moving from a very high-risk area (e.g., OB doing high-volume deliveries) to a lower-risk scope (e.g., gynecology-only, or non-procedural work) can make insurers more willing to write you. But they’ll still look at your history; it’s not a magic reset. What matters is that your future risk profile looks genuinely lower.

5. Can I negotiate my premium or terms if I have prior claims?
To a point. You’re not in a power position, but you can:

  • Work with a broker to get multiple quotes
  • Offer to take a higher deductible
  • Accept some coverage limitations initially
  • Ask about rate improvements after a set period of clean practice
    Don’t expect miracles, but you’re not completely powerless.

6. Do I need a lawyer to deal with insurers if I have prior claims?
Usually you don’t need a lawyer just to buy coverage. What you need is a solid broker and your own documentation organized. You do want legal input if:

  • There are ongoing board actions
  • You’re negotiating a separation agreement with a group that affects tail
  • There’s concern that application answers might conflict with legal documents or prior testimony

7. Is going without malpractice insurance ever a reasonable option if I can’t get coverage?
No. Going bare in modern U.S. practice is playing Russian roulette with your career and personal assets, and many hospitals, payers, and states won’t even let you practice without proof of coverage. If you truly can’t get standard coverage, you look at E&S, hard-to-place programs, scope changes, or different practice settings—not “no insurance.”


Key takeaways:

  1. Yes, you can usually get malpractice coverage even with prior claims—but expect more scrutiny, higher cost, and sometimes tighter terms.
  2. How you package and explain your claims history (and what you’ve changed since) has a massive impact on what offers you get.
  3. A sharp malpractice broker plus a real risk-improvement story will do more for you than wishful thinking or trying to hide your past.
overview

SmartPick - Residency Selection Made Smarter

Take the guesswork out of residency applications with data-driven precision.

Finding the right residency programs is challenging, but SmartPick makes it effortless. Our AI-driven algorithm analyzes your profile, scores, and preferences to curate the best programs for you. No more wasted applications—get a personalized, optimized list that maximizes your chances of matching. Make every choice count with SmartPick!

* 100% free to try. No credit card or account creation required.

Related Articles