The Real Reason Partners Push You Into Certain Tax Structures

The real reason partners push you into certain tax structures has almost nothing to do with “helping you save on taxes.”

It’s about control, leverage, and who gets stuck holding the bag when things go bad.

You’re told it’s “just how we do it” or “our accountant recommends this.” What you’re not told is which structures protect them and expose you, who’s really benefiting from the setup, and how these choices quietly shift power and money away from you for years.

Let me walk you through what’s actually going on behind those partnership meetings and “entity selection” conversations that magically appear the moment you start making real money.

---

Why Partners Care So Much About Your Tax Structure

Here’s the part nobody says out loud in the conference room:

Your entity type is not just about taxes. It’s about who has what leverage, who shares what risk, and how easy it is to get rid of you.

When senior partners push a specific structure, they usually care about at least one of these:

1. Limiting their liability exposure if you screw up.
2. Preserving their control over money flows, voting, and exit terms.
3. Keeping the practice’s financials clean and predictable for lenders, buyers, or hospital systems.
4. Shifting administrative/benefit costs onto you without lowering your collections percentage.

They’ll wrap all of this in language about “tax efficiency” and “standard for our group.” But if you listen carefully, what they’re defending is the architecture of power and profit they’ve built over a decade.

I’ve watched partners argue passionately that “everyone needs to be an S‑corp” in a meeting, then privately admit to the accountant afterward, “We just can’t have employees on W‑2s causing problems with overtime and benefits.”

Different story when you’re not in the room.

---

The Usual Structures They Push – And Why

Let’s decode the greatest hits you get pitched as you approach partnership or high-income employment.

1. “You should set up an S‑corp and contract with us”

This is the classic move for many private practice groups and even some hospital-affiliated groups using 1099 models.

What they tell you:

• “You’ll save on payroll taxes.”
• “You can deduct more business expenses.”
• “This is the most tax-efficient way for high-income physicians.”

What’s under the surface:

• You’re not their employee. You’re a vendor.
• They offload employment law risk, overtime issues, wrongful termination claims, and benefits obligations.
• Their malpractice and compliance risk is cleaner: “Independent contractor” sounds very nice in front of a jury.
• They reduce payroll taxes on their side as well (no employer share on you).
• It’s easier to reduce your hours, cut your pay, or drop you with far less legal friction.

In other words: your S‑corp makes their life easier and cheaper. Full stop.

Yes, S‑corps can be great for you in the right context. Reasonable salary, distributions, retirement plan flexibility. But most groups are not sitting there obsessed with optimizing your retirement bucket. They’re obsessed with not being on the hook if you become a problem.

I’ve sat in meetings where the practice attorney said, “If we keep them as true independent contractors, we cut our exposure dramatically,” and within a week every new hire was “strongly advised” to form an S‑corp “for taxes.”

They weren’t lying about the taxes. They were just leaving out the part where your legal protections get trimmed down at the same time.

---

2. “Everyone here is a partner in the LLC taxed as a partnership”

This is the line in many mid-to-large specialty groups: ortho, GI, cards, anesthesia. You’ll hear:

“We’re all equal partners here. K‑1 income. Very tax efficient.”

What’s actually going on:

The LLC/partnership setup is great for:

• Flexible profit allocation among partners.
• Passing income (and losses) through without corporate tax.
• Laying the groundwork for buy-ins, buy-outs, and complex waterfall distributions.

Who does that flexibility really benefit? The people who already control the agreement.

Every partnership agreement I’ve ever read in a mature practice has fine print carving out:

• Different classes of partners (voting vs non‑voting, equity vs income-only).
• Allocation of “overhead” and “shared expenses” that are mysteriously heavier for newer or lower-status partners.
• Formulas for buy‑in that are “fair” on paper but disproportionately reward the early partners who set the rules.

So when they push you to join as a partner in the existing LLC taxed as a partnership, what they’re really doing is pulling you into a system they’ve already tuned to benefit themselves.

You’re not coming to a blank slate. You’re walking into a casino where the table limits, odds, and house rules have already been written by the people cashing the chips.

Yes, the tax treatment can be reasonable. Sure, K‑1 income is nice. But understand that their enthusiasm about “you becoming a member of the LLC” is at least 50% about perpetuating the system that made them rich.

---

3. “You don’t need your own entity; just be a W‑2 through our management company”

You see this more in hospital-employed models and large corporate groups (radiology, EM, anesthesia, urgent care, etc.) where the structure is built around a “management company” plus a separate “professional corporation.”

What they tell you:

• “We handle all the complexity, you just get a paycheck.”
• “You get benefits, retirement, malpractice covered. Easy.”

What’s really happening:

The organization wants:

• Full control over your schedule, work location, and comp.
• Clean employment status for compliance and HR purposes.
• To keep the entire profit margin above your comp inside their corporate stack.

You’re W‑2. No entity. No leverage. You’re a line item on their expense sheet.

From a pure legal-risk perspective, this structure lets them lock you into their policies, their restrictive covenants, and their internal pay formulas. Your tax structure is an afterthought because your flexibility is an afterthought.

If a physician in that system pipes up and says, “I want to be 1099 and use an S‑corp for tax planning,” the response is almost always some version of, “We can’t do that, our model doesn’t allow it.” Translation: It undermines the control framework and standardization they need to keep margins predictable.

They are not neutral about your structure. They just phrase it as if it’s out of their hands.

---

What Partners Are Really Optimizing For (It’s Not You)

Let me strip away the marketing and cliché soothing language.

When partners debate structures behind closed doors, they’re focused on three things:

1. Risk Containment
   They want malpractice exposure, employment claims, regulatory issues, and financial risk to be tightly boxed. Entity choices, employment vs contractor, and ownership tiers are tools for this.

2. Economic Hierarchy
   They want the high producers, founders, or politically strong partners to keep a larger piece of the economics. Entity structures and tax classifications (who’s a partner vs who’s “contracted”) help separate “real partners” from “worker bees.”

3. Exit Value
   They think about private equity, hospital buy-outs, or eventual sale. The cleaner, more centralized, and more controllable the structure, the more attractive it is to buyers.

Where do you fit in?

You’re not at the center of the design. You’re a variable.

The “advice” you get is reverse-engineered to fit whatever structure best serves those three things, then dressed up as what’s “best for you.”

I’ve literally heard: “We can’t let new hires be direct partners in the main entity; it’ll screw up our valuation. Have them set up S‑corps and we’ll contract with them through the MSO instead. The accountant can explain the tax perks to them.”

There it is, in plain language.

---

The Real Tradeoffs: Tax Savings vs Control vs Risk

Here’s where you need to stop thinking like a resident and start thinking like an owner.

The decision isn’t just: “Which saves me the most in taxes this year?”

The real questions are:

• How does this structure limit or expand my leverage?
• How easily can they cut me, demote me, or squeeze my comp?
• What personal liability am I taking on?
• How tied am I to their practice model if things change?

To make this less abstract, look at a simple comparison.

Setup	Who It Mostly Favors
W-2 employee of hospital/group	Employer control & predictability
1099 S-corp contracting with group	Group risk reduction & flexibility
Partner in LLC taxed as partnership	Existing senior partners & founders
Solo S-corp / professional corp	You (if you control patient base)
Hybrid: employee + side S-corp	Employer first, you at the margins

Notice what’s missing: there’s no structure that “maximizes your taxes and your power simultaneously” when you’re a junior in someone else’s system.

You trade:

• Simplicity and benefits for less control (W‑2).
• Some benefits and protections for more flexibility (1099).
• Autonomy for a piece of a larger machine (partnership in an LLC/PC).
• Stability for full responsibility (your own corp/practice).

What partners push is rarely about giving you the best of all worlds. It’s about making sure you fit cleanly into the machine they already built.

---

Specific Red Flags in How They Pitch Structures

Pay attention to the language. After a while, you hear the same scripts.

“Everyone does it this way.”
Translation: “We’re not opening the can of worms of customizing your deal.”

“Our accountant recommends this.”
Translation: “Our accountant was hired to protect the group, not you.”

“This is the only way to maintain fairness.”
Translation: “Fairness as defined by people who are already on top.”

“You’ll actually save more this way, trust us.”
Translation: “We need you to accept less control and more risk, and we’re sweetening the pitch with a tax narrative.”

Here’s the general pattern:

• They overemphasize the tax upside.
• They minimize the legal and control downside.
• They portray the structure as fixed and non-negotiable.
• They frame alternatives as risky, nonstandard, or selfish.

I’ve seen junior docs shamed in partner meetings for asking about alternative structures: “We’ve never done it that way. This is a team, not a buffet.”

Translation: “Don’t question a system that works very well for us.”

---

How This Plays Out in Real Scenarios

Let me give you a few scenarios that have actually happened, with identifying details scrubbed.

Scenario 1: The “Tax-Efficient” S‑Corp That Became a Noose

A cardiology group in the Midwest converted all new hires to 1099 independent contractors through their own S‑corps. They pushed it hard: “You’ll save thousands in payroll taxes; our consultant will help you set it up.”

Year 3, reimbursement dropped, and the group cut all 1099 rates by 15% overnight. No severance. No HR process. Just a contract amendment: sign or lose your schedule.

The partners? Safely insulated through their main LLC entity, with different comp protections and internal distribution rules.

Those S‑corps did save the associates some money in FICA. They also made it effortless to slash their income.

---

Scenario 2: The “Partnership Track” That Was Really a Revenue Funnel

An anesthesia group on the coasts had a tight LLC partnership. New hires came on as “income partners” with K‑1s but no real voting rights for 5 years.

Their pitch was: “You become a member of the LLC; you’re not a W‑2 peasant; you share in the upside.”

The catch buried in the operating agreement:

• The “founding partners” got a fixed percentage off the top for “administrative and legacy value.”
• New partners bought in at a price based on an inflated multiple of EBITDA.
• Exit rules made it easy to push out low producers with minimal payout.

When the group later got a private equity offer, founding partners got a disproportionate slice of the buyout. The newer “partners” were technically equity holders but functionally just better-dressed employees wearing a K‑1.

Structuring everyone as LLC partners “for tax reasons” also conveniently locked them into a system that made it hard to leave without losing their buy-in value.

---

Scenario 3: The “We’ll Handle Everything” W‑2 Trap

A hospital-employed radiologist group insisted everyone be W‑2 through a system-owned professional corporation. Docs got standard benefits, 403(b), a small match.

No entities. No negotiation. Take it or leave it.

When the hospital decided to bring in a telerad vendor and cut on-site comp, they didn’t renegotiate contracts. They rewrote the RVU schedule and re-leveled everyone’s compensation tiers.

The physicians had exactly zero structural leverage. They were a cost center. Entity choice made that clean and simple for the hospital. Freedom lost in exchange for “simplicity.”

---

So What Should You Actually Do?

No, I’m not going to tell you, “Always choose X structure.” That’s garbage advice and usually wrong.

What I will tell you is this:

Before you sign anything or form any entity solely because “the partners said so,” you need your own counsel. Not their accountant. Not the attorney who “handles everything for the group.”

Your own advisor. Someone whose loyalty is pointed one way: at you.

And you need to frame the decision with better questions:

• If I become a 1099 S‑corp, what protections do I lose compared to being W‑2? What contractual language do I need to buffer that?
• If I become a member of the LLC, what voting rights do I actually have? How are profits really allocated? What are the exit terms?
• If I stay W‑2, am I accepting permanent second‑tier status in this group, or is there a defined path to something else?
• What happens if reimbursement drops and they need to cut costs—how easy is it to cut me under this structure?

You’re a physician. You’ve handled actual life-and-death decisions. You can handle entity selection once you see it for what it actually is: a power and risk allocation problem that gets disguised as “tax planning.”

---

Visual: How Control Shifts With Different Setups

Relative Control Level by Physician Tax/Legal Structure

Category	Value
W-2 Employee	20
1099 S-corp With One Group	40
LLC Partner (Junior)	50
LLC Partner (Senior)	80
Independent S-corp With Own Patients	90

That’s the core tradeoff. As your control and upside increase, so does your responsibility and exposure. Partners already climbed that ladder. They’re now using structure to keep their position locked in and your mobility limited.

---

How to Push Back Without Torching the Relationship

You do not have to walk into partner meetings like a wannabe tax-lawyer gladiator. You’ll lose that fight. You also don’t need to just nod and say “Okay” to whatever they push.

You need a smarter play.

First, separate the conversation:

• One conversation about economic terms: comp, bonuses, buy‑in, call pay.
• Another conversation about legal/tax structure: W‑2 vs 1099, partner vs non‑partner, entity choices.

They like to blend those two so that questioning the structure sounds like questioning the money or “fairness.” Don’t fall for that.

You can say something like:

“I’m comfortable with the general economic proposal. I want my own CPA and attorney to review the entity and tax structure side so I understand the long-term implications. Then we can finalize.”

Calm. Professional. Hard to attack.

Second, assume the deal is adjustable at the margins, even if they pretend it isn’t. Examples:

• If they insist you be 1099 S‑corp, you negotiate stronger contract protections: notice periods, minimum schedules, clearer termination causes.
• If they push you into LLC partnership, you ask about vesting of buy‑in, protections against dilution, and real voting thresholds.
• If they lock you into W‑2, you push on downside protection: minimum base, clearer bonus targets, written partnership pathways (if those exist).

And third, remember this: if they get hostile the moment you ask smart questions about structure, you just learned something extremely valuable about who you’re dealing with.

---

One More Thing: PE, Hospitals, and The Future Buyer

Partners are not just thinking about their current income. They’re thinking about the exit.

Private equity, hospital acquisition, regional roll-ups—those sharks are circling almost every specialty.

The “standard structure” they push you into is usually one that:

• Makes the practice look clean and valuable to a buyer.
• Centralizes control so a buyer doesn’t deal with hundreds of mini-entities with real power.
• Keeps the biggest chunk of any future sale in the hands of a smaller group at the top.

So yes, they push you into tax structures that look neat on a spreadsheet. But underneath, what they’re doing is aligning the practice to sell you as part of the package while preserving their own upside.

Just nice to know what game you’re actually in, isn’t it?

---

Simple Mental Model Before You Sign Anything

When someone senior says, “You should structure yourself like this, it’s what we all do,” run it through this filter:

1. Does this increase their control over me?
2. Does this make it easier or harder to cut my pay or terminate me?
3. Does this expose me personally to more liability or financial risk?
4. Is the person giving advice also benefiting financially from me adopting this structure?
5. Have I had this reviewed by someone whose paycheck doesn’t come from them?

If you can’t answer yes to #5, you’re flying blind no matter how “tax efficient” they claim it is.

---

---

FAQ (Exactly 3 Questions)

1. Is being a 1099 S‑corp always better than being W‑2 for a physician?

No. Sometimes it’s better, sometimes it’s a trap. You might save on payroll taxes and gain expense flexibility, but you lose employee protections, benefits, and often leverage. If the group can cut your rates or terminate you quickly, those “tax savings” can vanish with one contract change. You run the numbers with your own CPA, and you evaluate the stability and trustworthiness of the group before you celebrate being 1099.

2. If I’m becoming a partner in an LLC or PC, what are the two or three clauses I must understand?

You need to know:

1. The profit distribution formula—who gets what, in what order.
2. The buy‑in and buy‑out rules—how your equity is priced when you enter and when you leave.
3. Voting and control thresholds—what decisions require what percentage of votes and what class of partners can vote.
   Those three drive almost everything about your economic reality and power, and they’re usually where senior partners have quietly stacked the deck.

3. Can I ask for a different structure than what the group uses for everyone else?

You can ask. Whether you get it depends on how replaceable you are and how strong your negotiating position is. Highly recruited subspecialists sometimes carve out custom arrangements—hybrid W‑2/1099 setups, different partnership timelines, or special comp tiers. But here’s the truth: if they’re rigid and offended that you even asked, that’s not a structure issue; it’s a culture issue. And culture is much harder to “fix” than an LLC election.

---

Key points:

1. Partners push structures that protect their control, economics, and exit—not primarily your tax bill.
2. Entity choice is really about risk and leverage, disguised as “tax planning.”
3. Never accept a structure pushed by the group without your own advisor walking you through who wins, who loses, and what happens when things go bad.